Pete

I clicked on this link because I thought it was a thread about Red Bryant

soon they will ban "kitty" because it is misogynistic, They they might ban "fag"? because it is offensive to gays. Then they might ban swearing all together. We only need a few basic rules. More rules give the league more power. And I subscribe to the Lenny Bruce philosophy- when you ban a word- you make the word more powerful. !@#$ PC. !@#$ censorship. !@#$ book burners It reminds me of when those !@#$ing idiots censored Mark Twain

its a big world outside the US. Pretty much the whole world was above average temperature wise in 2013 besides the US

He is a a beast! 31- but 11 sacks last year. Can play inside or outside. And we can add to our arsenal of passrushers! http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/10501089/new-york-giants-let-justin-tuck-hakeem-nicks-test-free-agency-gm-jerry-reese-says?addata=module-b

sounds like a deal again if Watkins is availble at 9.

Knocking a women out unconscious in a crowded casino and dragging her? Domestics happen everywhere, but this is extreme

so say 33 - Seferi-Jenkins our new starting TE 41 Shayne Shov- our new starting MLB 45 Cyris Richardson- our new starting G 55-Dee Ford- possible new starting OLB that can get to he passer 71-Carlos Hyde RB 73-Brandon Coleman WR We would take down theAFC east with that draft

This is the deepest draft in 10+ years. I would stockpile second round picks. So if a team offered 3 second round picks(high middle low), and a high 3rd I would strongly consider. Think about it - the bills are picking 9, 41, 73 now. So if we swapped out 9 for 33,45, 55, and 71- that would add 6 quality players selected in the first 73

Dik smub? Barry Brady? I recognize that prose

I was in Poland returning to my hotel after a big night- it was 6 am or so. Well some Germans were drinking beers, so I joined in. So I asked if they were just getting in from a big night. No they said, they loved beer for breakfast and told me that is how they do it in Germany

I like it. Myself, I would prefer Borland in the 3rd. But if we landed Greg Robinson in first I would be quite pleased

no thanks. I don't care for anyone who wears a superman tshirt

one millisecond after midnight. I love having beer beginning an adventure. So if I wake up at 4:30 am to go fishing, a beer is fantastic. If I get up at 7 to go skiing- beer is breakfast of champions. Catching a red eye flight somewhere- cocktail no matter the time

hes our leading receiver

The NFL is corporate welfare

New Bedford Mass had a minor earthquake the other day. I wonder if eastern quakezones are starting to wake up

I am confused. Do you want thugs or nasty players? What is the point of this thread?

give me JJ Watt

There is no justifying his salary. For comparison. the President earns $400,000. **** is out of whack

You don't need thugs. Give me Peyton Manning, Larry Fitzgerald and Barry Sanders

Did anyone happen to read The Sordid End of Dave Meggett? http://www.sbnation.com/longform/2014/1/21/5320000/david-meggett-criminal-history-profile

Nice win over the ruskies!

But TBD says you don't draft G that high. And I keep reading "we need playmakers". Well Tavon was the only "playmaker" selected top 11- and he is no Spiller. You should always select highest rated player. If Robinson slides to us, we will run up and make the pick. The value in the first round is LB and Oline. If we stay put- we go Barr or Mack, or one of the top 3 OL- depending who slips. But the true value is in the second and third rounds with so many underclassman. !@#$ it, I would pull a Bobby Beathred and trade next years number 1 for a second this year

People are out of their minds if they think they can get Colt in the 7th. He is too talented. I say he lasts no longer then the 3rd. And you know he will kill it at the combine and boost his stock