Jump to content

Pete

Community Member
  • Posts

    19,745
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pete

  1. http://seahawksdraftblog.com/a-seahawks-bills-trade-proposal-involving-frank-clark it is interesting to hear some Seahawk message board suggestions for Clark-Bills trade. We aren't too far apart with cost
  2. me too. Oliver and Clark would make our defense elite IMO. Then focus rest of draft on offense
  3. I'm down for this draft. We can draft Taylor, DK, Hotch, Oliver, Wilkins,trade down- I am good with all that- as long as we get our stud DT. If we do not go DT in 1st, we must make sure we land Simmons, Tillery, or other stud DT with 2nd selection IMO PS- Rock on Jordan Phillips!
  4. I like DK and Harry for the Bills. If not them, I would wait until 4th/5th for Lodge or AJ
  5. The thread title was bold predictions, not state the obvious
  6. Beane makes 3+ trades between now and end of draft
  7. DK, Oliver, White, Wilkins, and Hock all have a chance to be there at 9. I think they all have a chance to be great players in the NFL the next 5 years
  8. I've been banging drum for Miles for a bit. My ideal realistic draft- Oliver 3 tech Ferguson Edge Miles RB Knox TE I don't care if we trade up to get those 4 players. If we land these 4, bring on the playoffs(barring injuries)
  9. I like Jaylon too but there is no way he lasts until 4th round. I have been posting my ideal realistic draft scenerio is we draft Oliver, and trade up for Ferguson in late 1st.
  10. don't trade up Beaner. There are cap ramifications and opportunity costs. Look at the mistakes of trading up for Zay, Dawkins, and Edmunds
  11. What DT are we getting in 2nd round? Simmons and Tillery are going in 1st IMO. Ed Oliver has been in discussion for years about being #1 overall. I like DK. But the DT value is in 1st, WR, TE, RB post 1st
  12. If Bruce Willis ODed on Viagra, the headline could read "Bruce Willis died harder"
  13. Did you ever take a statistics class? Just because something costs more, does not mean it's better. The larger sample size, the larger the probability of hitting a draft pick
  14. jonah or sweat at 9 I would strongly dislike! We could be leaving Oliver, DK, White, Hock on board- all 4 could be perennial all pro's IMO
  15. If we are going BPA, we need to take Harry in the 2nd. I also like Rapp better than Risner
  16. I’d hold onto all our picks through 4 rounds. So far we have wasted prime draft picks trading up for Zay, Edmunds, Dawkins.. 79, 149, 156 for Dawkins- Kareem Hunt, George Kittle opportunity cost 22, 65 forEdmunds Calvin Ridley, Billy Price, Darius Leonard...Fred Warner, Sam Hubbard opportunity cost 44, 91 for Zay Dalvin Cook, nick Chubb, juju smith shuster, Alvin Kamara, Eddie Jackson, etc opportunity cost and no ***** that you have benefit of hindsight looking at past drafts. That’s not the point. The point is hold on to draft picks, you have a better shot at finding great players the larger sample size. My foresight is to hold on to picks, add more this year and next year if possible. Not to mention draft picks don’t wreck your salary cap. i urge you Mr Beane, hold on to draft picks. Look and learn from the bad trades we have made squandering picks
  17. that is. That poor young lady. That had to hurt like *****!
  18. The Bills trade back to Washington, gain second round pick, Ed Oliver slide to us. We land Jaylon Ferguson and Irv Smith in second round. Miles Sanders in 3rd, we trade up and take Dru Sumia, we draft Anthony Johnson, and then concentrate on depth and special teams with remaining picks. Ansah gets healthy, and signs 1 year prove it deal
  19. If we can stop the run, and if someone besides Hughes starts pressuring QBs- we will have a top defensive unit. Turnovers, field position, and big plays will be benefits of adding quality DT and Edge
  20. Dawkins will benefit of having 2 veterans to his right
  21. trading two 4s, two 5ths, 6, and 7 for a 3 is Mike Ditka dumb. Perhaps dumber
×
×
  • Create New...