Jump to content

Delete This Account

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,267
  • Joined

Everything posted by Delete This Account

  1. ahh, vacation. jw
  2. rob johnson available. drew bledsoe, too. jw
  3. fine. but Troy Smith won't be able to prove anything in the Bills system any time soon, given that he's going to have to learn it and missed all of minicamp to do so. at first glance, it appears the Bills are going to address QB situation next offseason. jw
  4. big deal Troy Smith was named the starter in Baltimore. there is a long history of quarterbacks who have been named starters and never done much. just look here in Buffalo. that's not to say that Troy Smith is a bad quarterback, he's merely unproven. and Pdaddy's obsession here is a little much, i think. the key, i think, is Troy Smith is no longer the starter in Baltimore, and the Ravens, i would guess, are happy with that scenario given the fact that they've actually found a bona fide starter capable of getting them to the playoffs. Troy Smith cannot lay claim to that fact because he is unproven. jw
  5. i thought Joe Flacco was the starter in Baltimore? didn't he help them to the playoffs? wouldn't starting a playoff game trump starting in the preseason, Weeks 1-4? what is this all about? jw
  6. wow, this is something that amounts to very little as Troy Smith now joins a long line of players the Bills have never signed in being their starter over the past 10 months. Vick someone mentioned Whitehurst Tebow Clausen now Smith. ... Testeverde next? jw
  7. you're right about that. he probably went up to Georgia, given the traditional location of hell. good point. jw
  8. why are you yelling so early in the morning? jw
  9. compliments will get you nowhere in this thread (but are certainly appreciated). jw
  10. Jack, i think you are mistaken. ha, ha, ha, ha ... etc jw
  11. i cover the Buffalo Bills for a living, and think it's too early to tell how good or bad or mediocre they shall be. and at some point, i predict Chan Gailey will name a starting quarterback. the point of this post, however, is not only to prove JustJack wrong but to begin some crazy cross-board last-post-thread/last-laugh wins thread until someone puts an end to this or that thread, or, hopefully both, in which case i will take credit for the demise. sorry jack ... jw
  12. if that is the case, let me then attempt to get the last laugh. jw ha, ha.
  13. but what if you laugh, and then i laugh, and then you laugh, and someone like Beerball laugh's, and then we all start laughing, and it's nearly impossible to figure out who actually laughed last because somone guffawed right at the end, which proved your quote wrong, and then it winds up being like "last post wins" and this laughing fit goes on for say 390 pages, because few of us have had the superior sense of self-importance to refer to anything that we've posted as being "special," which actually might be the most laughable thing about this, aside from the fact that you've included "all" of "your thoughts" in one posting, which is both laughable and a little sad. so let's begin: Ha! jw
  14. damn, my streak's over. jw
  15. caught me, dean. i was putting a few back last night. oh, and happy birthday to whoever he is. jw
  16. that is not the meaning of "comprehed." in fact, i don't think that's even a word. jw
  17. did this require a new thread? (unless this was a veiled attempt at haiku) but i think you failed at that. jw
  18. happy belated birthday nee, steely, dan, Rfeynman or whatever the hell you call yourself. jw
  19. who the hell is nee? is that like a monty python thing? quit screwing with me. jw
  20. i might be speaking for many here, but there's really no need to apologize for being blunt, because i couldn't make heads or tails out of what you wrote. if that's blunt, you just might be stoned. jw
  21. first post from ringside at Niagara Falls Conference Center while awaiting Rahman-Miller fight. jw
×
×
  • Create New...