here's my question about some of the comments here, and how i've been pegged a loose-goon liberal. leanings aside, i'm sure there are none of you who know my voting record in Canada, which many of you might find intriguing.
and i've certainly made some comments here knocking one person or another, but it's been knocking them for their utter showbiz foolishness (beck, hannity) or for comments they've made, John Bolton, whom i found to be arrogant.
if anyone can find one byte (just one) of a mention supporting pelosi or harry reid, or knocking Ronald Reagan, well then i'm guilty as labeled.
i won't argue that i have certain leanings and the perceptions are readily apparent.
but in fear of being repetitive, i bring up those who have influenced me, my way of thinking and my style of writing: from HST to Paul Westerberg, from Chuck Bukowski to Graham Greene, from Mr. John Cash to Steve Earle from The Clash and Tom Waits.
given that, some might question whether i don't have anarchist leanings. i certainly won't go that far.
what is true is my lifelong aspiration to live up to the lofty goals established by those rebellious yellers and cranks who have influenced my creative side.
and as straight as AP copy can be, i've found that my influences have helped shape a phrase or two in my day on the wire.
what bugs me about the "liberal dumbass" comment is that it lacks dimension. it's an easy label that can be applied anywhere, like a post-it note. given what matters to me, a phrase i've used in this thread, i'm left with two choices, to stop posting on PPP or engage. and i chose the latter because i've never been a fan of walls, fourth, fifth, whatever.
jw