manbeast

He is 29 if they are drafted at 21-22 and they are aging at 29 when is their prime?

NO, ARZ, MINN, what do they have in common oh they didn't draft their QBs. Packers and Jets didn't draft there NTs. the Pats didn't draft Welker or Moss. The giants didn't draft Plaxico Buress regardless of what you think they were better with him. All of these teams are loaded with FA aquisitions before you make a statement why don't you actually look into it the first Team you mentioned Always brings in Free Agents every year almost their entire secondary for 09 were FAs.

How much research have you done on this? I have done alot and find that we need 2 NTs and 1 LB and a DE. The DE and the LB are brought in to compete and add depth. Even Nix says we are not that far away so why do you people think we should scrap everything and start over. You give me a LT and a WR with McNabb and the above and I will show you a team that makes the playoffs will in the rebuilding process. The truth is that the NEs and INDs of the world are always in the rebuilding process. Thats why they stay good.

So Sully gets one right because he agrees with you?

There are a few of us that actually know what we are talking about Edwards may actually be a good fit for a west coast offense what alot of people don't realize is that he was asked to run an offense that doesn't fit his skill set like when the Jets tried to put Favre in a conservative Offense it just doesn't work. your players have to fit the system just because they don't fit it doesn't mean they suck. I believe that is the case with Edwards. People forget who recommended him. Walsh(west-coast offense). This doesn't mean he will be good there but because ha wasn't good here doesn't mean he sucks.

We actualy trade back into the 1st for Wood.

No he would have never held out and made the transition to LB. He would have been a steal if taken in a later round or if he had a different agent hopeful he will prove that this year.

Top ten selections are supposed to be instant contributers. with the exception being QB

It wouldn't be hard you like many others just pretend to know what your talking about no one can be certain but all we need are two NT and 1 OLB for depth. Unless Schobel leaves then we will need 2. I could be wrong but at least my opinion is based on fact. Not just an unresearched baseless one.

The pats don't give a crap what their players think he will be franchised.

I'd give them both, for a first or a second and third and thats giving them lynch as a constalation prize patriots and oakland set the market last year schobel may stay though.

Wow you really are ignorant why does he suck because you said so. Back it up or shut up. His job is to rush the passer and get a few tackles on the way Like I showed you his tackles #'s are good He has 26.5 sacks over the last 2 seasons thats his job not too many do it better. A good opinion is based on fact.

He won't sign a one year deal and will be a hot commodity he is not TO He butted heads with Parcell's because he went to Mcdonald's. Yes Parcell's has an ego problem and really did bench to make an example of him but Porter did not kneel at his feet and take his mark. So Parcell's made him a part timer. What would you do if your Boss was out to destroy you because he asked you to stop chewing your fingernails and he later caught you doing it. And I don't want to hear the Money thing right is right their is no Mcdonald's clause in his contract it was not affecting his play so it was none od Parcell's business.

Because you don't understand the Defense his #s are about right for 3-4 his #s are great considering he was not on the field full time and was not on the field at all for a couple games James Harrison had 71 tckls and 10 scks as a full time player that started 16 games Porter played was limited BY PARCELL's and nothing else started 14 games and still had 41 tackles and 9 scks. Please don't make me do your research any more it becomes tiring.

He was better than alot of guys in the Hall.

Ours constantly throw the ball at the defensive backs hands.

Who cares he is not our long term solution. but I don't believe it affects him much he already knows how to play. Just look at how injuries early in a career affect a developing player as apposed to a vet.

Actually as far as his production goes he had 2 pro bowl type years and 1 good year with a bad year behind a terrible offensive line and One of those good years was behind a bad line you forget those were the Mike Williams is our franchise LT years.

If I was the GM I would be looking to land Hampton Trade down to mid round take a NT and WR ib round 2 so we don't have a first or a second to trade. it would be hard to say no if they were willing to take next years first.

How do you suppose a lockout would affect a young developing QB?

He's worth a first but #9 is to valueable to us. The only position we can't get via FA is a Franchise LT this draft I believe is loaded with them in the first round. I'd give Lynch and a conditional pick that could be a rd.1 for next year but if he didn't last 2 yrs. then they would have to return a 1st in exchange for our 3rd a different year.

Besides TO for 1 year who has he had not including westbrook and what he had this year.

Alot of good Qbs are productive into their late 30s

OK, I am a huge research guy if I post something I have done my research and please don't complain if our DEs don't put up monster sack #'s it isn't a bad thing for a DE to only get 6 or 7 sacks unlike our current D it is the main responsability of the line to eat up the O-line.

who i am trying really hard to find an ILB that weighs 275 Ray Lewis 250 T.Gooden 242 B.Scott 240 D.Harris 245 NE 240 and 245 do you need me to keep going I typer these three but I have search alot more before you post do your research. those two are actually the right size and speed.