I just saw the list of 25 semi-finalists for Canton. It reminded me of a difference of opinion I had with a Steelers fan who happens to work in local media where I live. I'm not going to say anything bad about the guy, because it's not his fault he was raised to like the Steelers. I view it as sort of a disability.
Anyway, Tony Boselli and Alan Faneca are both on the semi-finalist list this again year. Setting aside the tackle-vs-guard part of the argument, which one of these guys is more deserving (if either) of enshrinement?
I say Boselli, who was the most dominant player at his position for several seasons. Remember how much trouble he gave Bruce Smith? He was known around the league for being one of a tiny number of players with the ability to slow down #78. He was just a truck.
The Steelers fan I'm debating says it's Faneca. He had a longer career with more All-Pro honors (due to the longevity, of course).
Boselli had a shorter career because of injuries. But at his best, I say he was far better. I admit you have to respect 13 years of excellence, but Faneca was just never an indomitable as Tony Boselli.
Anyone have an opinion on this?