McBeane

My opinion of the two is as follows: MW3 is much more of an arcade game than BF3. Battlefield wins the realism award by a mile, IMO. However, not anyone can pick up a controller and enjoy playing Battlefield, as a previous poster alluded to, it takes time getting used to that a lot of people aren't willing to go through. MW3 is basically a wash and rinse repeat of the previous 3 COD games and has just gotten boring for me. With MW3, virtually anyone can pick up a controller and enjoy themselves without hating the game within 5 minutes. If you know what you are doing with FPS games, Battlefield 3 is the way to go. IMO, what is hurting BF3 from becoming the number 1 FPS is that so many people are still stuck on COD because that is what they are used to playing. Also, I've noticed that when people try switching from COD to BF, they don't like going through the learning process necessary to be good at BF, so they say screw it and go back to what they know.

Wow. You have officially entered into troll status. I would be interested to find out how many people have already ignored this clown in his short but useless stay here.

I know I'm in the minority here, but I have always believed that if Kelsay has his hand in the dirt, he can make an impact. He is a good 43 DE. As an OLB, it is just embarrassing watching him play.

And on cue, Toshiero comes in with the Ralph bashing. You are bordering on a crusade with this stuff for the past couple weeks.

Thank you Sacto. It gets really old seeing nearly every thread turn into a Ralph bashing in some sort within the first 5 posts. We get it, you don't like Ralph, congratulations.

Exactly my thoughts as well. If you want to smoke, that's fine. Who am I to tell you what to do?

Trading a LB + a 2nd rounder for a second year QB who has never gotten any worthwhile playing time? And you want him over Fitz.... I can understand not being a big fan of Fitz, but this is a classic case of the grass being greener on the other side. Different does not always equal better.

Freddie is still under contract next year.

If that is the logic that was followed, it further cements my opinion.

Worked for me in Rochester. Thanks!

Seriously? Barnett absolutely does not need to be replaced. If you really think that, then that says all I need to know about your football knowledge.

Furthermore, if every call was reviewed the game would easily last over 5.5-6 hours. Reviewing every call is so impractical I can't believe someone would think its possible.

Brilliant

And they are sitting on my bench this week... Oh well the season has been long over for my team anways haha.

This is a hobby. Enjoy this win while you can.

You have proven that you suck as a poster and a fan.

Wow. I'm speechless boys...

No Tebow Time today!!! This board may actually be tolerable this week

Just imagine Freddy getting the carries that Choice is right now. God I hope we end up using them both effectively next year.

Our first two picks are looking like slam dunks. Gotta love Dareus and Williams for the next 10 years.

We are falling right into the Tebow time trap

Spiller is too small to be anything but a bust

We may have a RB controversy next year fellas

You aren't supposed to create new threads during gametime. It's not like that policy went into effect this week... You couldn't have just posted this in the game thread??

Should be 16-7 now...