Mr. WEO

Flutie in Buffalo....

typo--56 rounded up.

Exactly. Wither Freddy Kitchens COTY?? Looks likes Stefanskis HC prowess began and ended with an ascending Mayfield

Dorsey will be calling plays from under the bus that pulled up…

yes. The numbers are similar, as you can see. 93 or 63, 52%, 54%.......

His % (56.5, 55.6, 51.6, 55.6) was pretty stable on the same team with the same QB and the same playbook despite being targeted 63 to 93 times....

I don't know. Have their been any who actually examined him and recommended retirement? Who's medical advice is he ignoring?

not equal, no. But close, given the numbers--as you can see. So it "means" they would have had similar numbers if they had similar targets. There's nothing tricky about that math. Cooper is the #1 on the Bills by default. They don't otherwise have one.

Bills 24-20.

It would be hard to be on your 4th team if you have been been traded 4 times (good pickup lol). Anyway, Diggs wasn't traded for any of your 2 existing reasons for a trade--you may have to expand your list. I have been talking about drops and catch % since I responded. Had Davis last year had as many targets as Cooper, he would have had about 1200 yards and 11 TD and 5 drops--- and no one would be saying he's terrible. Cooper doesn't have great hands--that's the topic being discussed.

He's been cleared to return no?

The QB % was a means to compare Cooper's QBs, as NewEra was. They all have about the same %. Obviously Watson isn't Josh Allen, but he completes 63% of his passes this year and he has no real problem finding his TEs, for example. Plus it is still true that Cooper dropped 10 passes in only 6 games. That's not on Watson.

The question was why would 4 teams trade him? Players don't trade themselves. The Bills traded Diggs--is it because they are "trash" or because they were dying of cap restriction (despite paying him 31 million not to play for them). The answer, as you know, is neither. They could stand him any more. All I have said is he is a legit #1 for the Bills and he has bad hands. Neither you nor the other guy above can dispute this. Your comparison of QBs completion % clearly didn't have the effect you were hoping for. Sure, for instance, Watson sucks (he's always been a flash in the pan)....but his completion % isn't much different from anyone else you listed.

It was not nefarious. It was a simple question. Each team chose not to keep him because he wasn't worth keeping compared to what they could get for him. Remember when everyone said Diggs wasn't a problem in Minny and claimed he would not be a problem here in Buffalo? Well, clearly all of that was wrong---pointing this out early on in his Bills career isn't "nefarious". Good players get traded for various reasons. Sometimes it's just because a team doesn't want the guy anymore. If you can't answer the simple question, that's ok too.

"ran out of town" is a joke here lol--fans can't run players out of town, despite what many here think (see the guy below, for instance). but they were down on him for drops and low catch %--same as Cooper. Drops are drops--balls that should have been caught. His 1st target as a Bill was dropped. He has 11 drops the past 7 games. Derek Carr is a career 65% passer, Josh Allen is 63%. This season, Watson completed 63.4% of his passes first 6 games (that includes Cooper's 10 drops, of course). I said Cooper is a legit #1WR for the Bills. Where in that did you read "he's no good"?

he's been a Bill for a week. I was a vocal Gabe Davis defender here (you know, when he was on the Bills roster), so I asked the question based on @generic_bills_fan post above. Pretty simple. if you want to join this discussion, you are welcome to. Maybe you can answer my question, since you are eager to contribute.

I heard it was 500 cities. This is pretty bad pandering by the Gov--"I saved the Bills from moving to 5 other places that I cannot name! Oh, by the way, the stadium will cost over 2 billion, so $650 million is nothing!" lol--politicians at their craven worst.

What's Cooper's excuse, this being his 4th team?

He is specifically restricted from this. Why would any team give up valuable info to his "minions"? That makes no sense. These color guys never get any meaningful info at these weekday visits. It's as much of a joke as "sideline reporting" or those coach interviews as they head off the field for halftime.

He's a legit #1, for the Bills purpose. But he has bad hands. He's dropped 30 passes in under 3 seasons---10 already this year! His catch percent is in the Gabe Davis range---and Buffalo fans "ran him out of town" for that performance.

OK, how does one cheat as a color commentator/owner? Flesh that comment out for me...

Do QBs lose consideration for having the most passing attempts? Of course not. So why should we even mention 191 (not 200) targets for a WR as exclusionary criteria for MVP? That number of targets is close to what the top receivers get every season. And he caught an incredible 76% of them them year. A "product of the QB"? Well every WR is a product of their QB---why bring it up? Stafford had Megatron for years in Detroit--one of the greatest ever. No triple crown. You could say Brady had his best year in 2021....if you didn't know 2007 existed: 50 TDs (a record at the time) vs only 8 ints, 69% completion, 4800 yards on only 578 attempts, undefeated. The only reason Kupp didn't win is because these chumps who vote have never voted a WR as MVP. It's a QB award. But yeah, Brady should have gotten it over Rodgers in 2021, by these criteria.

cowboys coming off 3 12 win seasons in a row. not his forte, to put it mildly...

MVP doesn't consider playoff performance---votes are counted before the playoffs start.. So, he should have gotten MVP based on his regular season Triple Crown. It's incredibly unique. Rodgers didn't even have his best season, nor did Brady. Kupp should have been a no brainer. They are 7-10 in the games he has missed since then. Now the Rams are calling it quits and looking (laughably) to unload a totally washed Stafford.

how do you cheat at color commentary?