Mr. WEO

let's see what Bruce Smith has to say about this first. Meanwhile, enjoy a single swig of beer as you ogle RJ's under-a-minute fantasy reel....

lol... there's the white flag

Guess Manning figures he’ll make a lot more money at Texas than the NFL, so, why not?

bread and circus

is it a show about trucker caps?

it's worse than that. the rest of his contract is tied up in this:

In his day, Cobb was an excellent hitter. But he never had to play against a Luis Arraez....or a Satchel Paige, for that matter.

Brady threw for 5300+ and 43 TD at 45 last season. Rodgers has thrown for over 4500 once in his career. Plus he is a bit of a choker. 1 SB a million years ago. Manning too has a rough playoff record with 7 one and dones. Brady wins games, particularly in the playoffs.

One more time….He dominated the players he faced. They weren’t the only n or necessarily the best pro baseball players of the era. Pretty simple. A time machine would likely allow us to see a presteroid Bonds hitting 100 HR a season against 1920s MLB pitchers and Ruth struggling to get 30 vs 1990s-2000s pitchers (for instance).

Bills lost to the Jags 2 weeks after the bye... Also, despite only 1 bye and longer season, the playoffs featured more great games than I've seen in one season in a while.

When you said that more likely than not, these were weaker than the settled cases, it raised my question. It also seems counterintuitive that the Asley Solis case in particular is more likely than not weaker than the settled cases. She was the one where he has admitted that she was crying after their encounter. Plus Watson's lawyer has implicated him publicly saying he was seeking "happy endings" and used so many therapists in the hopes of getting them.

why do you think the ones who won't settle most likely have the weakest cases?

lol....stop. I will agree with your statement that he had 55 seconds of career highlights though...

They would offer the least on the cases that could cost them the most?

he can't afford it?

more money than who? the plaintiff's attorney and his firm or the defendant?

An innocent man with 300 million earned in what would be 10 years isn't worried about legal fees to prove his innocence.

an hour later, his own agent said he'll likely be back

Dude; the "Dead Ball Era" (dirty brown scuffed balls falling apart after being used for an entire game, which made it throw erratically, hard to see and hit) ended ion 1920 (prior to this, Ruth hit a max of 29 HR in a season), after a guy got killed by a pitch. Thus began the Live Ball Era: "Rather than change the construction of the balls, which remained consistent between the transition from the "dead-" to "live-ball eras",[1] rule changes were instituted around how the balls were treated. Starting in 1920, balls were replaced at the first sign of wear, resulting in a ball that was much brighter and easier for a hitter to see. Additionally, pitchers were no longer allowed to deface, scuff, or apply foreign substances to the ball. The impact of the rule changes was felt almost immediately. In 1920, the game changed from typically low-scoring to high-scoring games, with a newfound reliance on the home run. That year, Babe Ruth set a record for slugging percentage and hit 54 home runs (smashing his old record of 29). Aiding in Ruth's success was the fact that he held the bat lower and swung with an uppercut, essentially trying to hit home runs. " Soooo...... the very year the new ball rules (fresh and white!!), Babe Ruth gives from 29 to 54 HR!

I don't think they have filed as a class . That wouldn't make sense for the plaintiffs.

I don't think they would have been tried together. If one of their stories doesn't hold up under cross, it shouldn't have much effect on another plaintiff's case. I assume they have all been deposed.

exactly. he was an outlier.

read the OP yes, i've said that several times now. Brady has been a dominant QB for decades against far better players than Ruth faced.. He is the GOAT. Ruth was "more dominant" is his day because he played a bunch of white guys only (for one)--which tempers his all time ("ever") dominance. Shall I say it again? Use crayonz? lol

I can't really argue for things I haven't claimed as true so I'll let you rant at the mirror now. Your act is as stale as ever.