Mr. WEO

so...."Chiefs are paper tigers"?

It was changed in 2005, I believe. Why would they change the rule when they wrote it expressly to allow this type of play. This is the intended outcome of the rule change. Why would they change a rule that is working exactly as intended? Every team should do it.

It's a legitimate use of a rule created specifically for this purpose. I can't see how it puts the QB in much jeopardy for injury.

if he’s innocent why doesn’t the woman and the hotel just give him all. the money. They would have to no?

What kind of high on Vicodin HC would be bringing in ol’ “I pimp out my wife” Rex Ryan??

he’s got that one big arm…

Next year started last month

it needs 3 threads. give it some time…

Barkley is that guy. He inexplicably keeps sneaking onto the QB roster

Has 1 Bills player ever been the topic of more threads than Edmunds?

the rule was changed specifically to allow players to be pushed forward, so probably not

Every play in a SB game is a play that Allen can’t make

different time, but MCNabb was pretty productive

This might work better if you stand in front of a mirror while you chant it…

What year is that from?

Dispute it.

wow, really???

Bills got lit up in 3 of 4 SBs. So if not record, what's the tie breaker?

he’s not going to win more games in DC with Riverboat Ron.

good point. This seems like a non-story, but for the guy who "runs" charity under his name. If you want to give, simply vet your charity. It's not. If you can't either don't give or don't care how it is spent. Simple. "37% of nonprofit organizations with private contributions of $50,000 or more reported no fundraising or special event costs on their 2000 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 Nearly 13% of operating public charities reported spending nothing for management and general expenses (Source: The Nonprofit Overhead Cost Study), and further scrutiny found that 75-85% of these organizations were incorrectly reporting the costs associated with grants." Only 40% of Wilson's charity goes to it's intended purpose? Yeah, I guess that's not great. Far more worrisome is that nearly 40% of charities claim they have no over head costs at all!!---when the vast majority of them are lying about that, no doubt to score more donations.

which threads?

You said the difference in the % was a game or two. I used that to point out that McD's far lower total games played makes a Reid comparison pretty meaningless---especially when you take into account post season success, which is all that matters in this conversation. McD's record is .444. Reid did struggle to win the big one. But at least he gets his team there....over and over. Compare his post season success with Mahomes as starter to McD's with Allen over the same time period.

breaking news..... So by taking away their entire Offense (LJ), they would be "dangerous"?

Not odd at all---fully deserved. He came in last year, they were the worst team in the league. A year later, they start 2-6 and go on a 7-2 run, beating GB twice (including in Lambeau, despite their playoff hopes dashed by some of the worst officiating all year in the Seahawks game---that allowed Seattle in and kept Detroit out). He won 9 games--same as Daboll---with a QB that had been tossed away by "future HOF HC" McVay. He went 5-1 in a Division that includes the Vikings and the Packers. Daboll got buried by his division, winning a single game. Campbell did a better job than Daboll. He deserved far more consideration for COTY.

Carroll absolutely deserved it over Daboll. He did some weird voodoo to reanimate Geno Smith's corpse into a top 10 QB (I didn't know he was still in the league!). But this should have been a slam dunk to Shanahan. Goes undefeated with their rookie 4th stringer to the NFCC. Put Daboll and those Giants in the AFCE and they are a 5 win team.