Maybe over a 3 course lunch. There's not much to see. He's had under 100 targets and had 2 seasons of single digit snap counts, max coming in at 36% once.
I think some of the criticism may be related to the question of: is this guy better than McKenzie, who would play for a fraction of this guy will cost, or if he's just another receiver decision that doesn't work out (like Sanders, Crowder, Duke Williams, Foster, Andre Holmes, Beasley 2.0, "Smoke" 2.0....).