If they get you to comment on them, as this is their goal, they certainly cannot be described as "futile". They serve no purpose but to elicit responses/discussions.
You keep proving their utility, not their futility.
I don't think it's reasonable to call people who find a little entertainment agreeing with (or, more likely, disagreeing with) various mock drafts "morons"
But, if so, you are "filling that role" in this very thread...with no hint of irony.
I’m sure the Chiefs wouldn’t trade their “problem” for whatever the Bills situation is in 2024. They seem to be managing their contracts/roster/cap just fine the past 5 years…….
lose your money?
you wouldn't want that money back---if the government was paying it to you? You would say: "that's ok, I don't want my fellow citizens to pay for my accidentally lost money"?
Your point was this in your OP: "To be fair, Rob led the Bills to a road playoff victory". It doesn't stand.
They were ahead of Tennessee despite RJ, not because of him. In. fact they were only ahead because McNair had an even worse game--maybe the worst playoff performance in NFL history. That was a gift any decent QB would have taken advantage of. A competent QB would have been blowing Tenn out--that wasn't exactly the '85 Bears D they were up against.
So no "credit" is due to a guy who had little positive impact on a game they lost.
Mocks are just speculative entertainment. No mockers have any info that any others do not.
Millions of people want to see these mock drafts---even just to disagree with them. So, obviously millions of clickers find value in them.
Your opinion runs counter to all evidence. But it can be your opinion.
The media, social and traditional, widely mocked the hiring.
The Owners had nothing to do with it, so they could hardly have "colluded against him". I'm sure they were happy to see this dumb choice made by one of their competitors.