Mr. WEO

McD gets Beane in. Then, within 5 seasons, Daboll is gone, replaced by the QB coach, who then is out, replaced by the next QB coach.....

"Who is truly the best" is settled in the playoffs/championship in every league--not by who beat whom in the regular season. That's, per game, meaningless. Relegation is something else entirely---relegated teams play in a lesser league, not in the 'other conference" in the same league. It's quite the opposite of what you are imagining... MAybe the NFL should make all teams share their draft boards? Like, you know, so they don't draft Mitch Trubisky over Mahomes, for instance?

SO they should all agree to change everything every few years? Mahomes and the Chiefs wouldn't dominate in the NFC....because their QBs aren't as good? This makes no sense at all. What sports league does this? None, simply because it lacks any logical reason to do so.

how long has this been corroding the OP's brain? In 1967, the NFL decided to align the conferences so that, 50-60 years later, 2 teams would dominate the SB?---and they should simply "mix it up" a bit if one conference dominates the SB? lol--in the pantheon of bad TBD idea, this may be its apex.

This is one problem with staffing the coaching ranks and FO's in the NFL. Guys get in and want to bring in their buddies or "promote from within" (in order to maintain authoritative control).

Agreed. Schoen was not ready for that job.

I think far too much is being put into the efficacy of a QB coach. Josh is entering his 7th year...endlessly parading in new voices in his ear at this point will have negligible returns. And Frank??? Come on... time for him to walk away from the game.

Hard to imagine that Raiders would not pick a QB in round 1. Also, I've never watched McCarthy and thought "wow", he's a lot better than Daniel Jones. Whiffing again on a mediocre QB wouldn't be survivable for Daboll and Scheon.

Not exactly--Jefferson is nearly averaging Diggs's career high (and that's with only 9+ games this season)--without a Josh Allen throwing him the ball. But even if we get past that, there is the obvious dilemma of a WR aging in decline vs. a young WR who started off in hsi prime.

They got a much better WR, cheap, thats all. Not "screwed".

there's just no chance that all the "no" voters will not be watching the SB.

true but the topic was how long the Steelers keep their coaches. 4 of those 6 SB wins were 45+ years ago. None in 16 years. They are stuck in second gear for many years now because of this philosophy of not changing HC because of "no losing seasons"

Well, no one knows who will be the best prior to....but the Vikings sure did think he would be a great pick---in fact enough that they felt very comfortable in getting rid of Diggs to get him. He had 2 great seasons, but sucking up another 160 targets to get to 1100 yards this season has worn him out. Plus in his career he consistently no-shows in playoff elimination games.

yet in 44 of those years, 2 SB's (3 years apart with essentially the same roster, 2 HC's). Since Tomlin took over a SB roster, and other than a few years when AB and Bell were together, the Steelers Offenses suck. At some point, that puts you in a rut, as they have been in for years. That team needs a fresh start.

who's "we"?

Vikings got over on the Bills with that trade....they got the best of Diggs then got a much better WR on a rookie contract. DIggs needs a WR1B to help him out.

Harbaugh is hamstrung by Lamar Jackson.

After an exhaustive search (around OBD)….

Wonder what ol McD is up to these days

How is he earning it outside of ST?? He played 9% of the snaps and had 1 touch all year. Why would that production need to be replaced, let alone cost 2 million?

"disabled' sounds right

he just dropped that?

matches the playoff performance of the DC/HC......

Goff (let dumbass McVay smell that until September)

2019, he had a great passing year. 36 TDs. Plus another 7 rushing. It's the 13 wins that is flavoring the voting this year--and the fact that he survived a season.