Mr. WEO

A week ago, Rodgers said he wasn't even jogging yet. Why on earth would he come back (in what...week 13? 15?) for a lost season? Makes no sense Campbell's a legit coach. COTY material. Saleh is that guy at Planet Fitness....

how is Saleh still a HC in the NFL? box of rocks.

Simple: "will people tune in?'

what's the point of watching the video? to rail at "the national media"? who cares?

no that's Knox. But tell us more!! Maybe you meant he has the highest YPC, or the 2nd highest # TDs, 1st downs and yards?

what's the point?

Just hire Chriss Simms so he can bring along Taysom Hill....

He's a moron then. Including this season, Bills Offense has ranked (in scoring): 5th, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd. not sustainable...lol. this is why McD has to go.

or they just didn't like each other. What does McD know about running the football or an Offense in general? If he was arguing with the #2/3 Offense in the league, then he is a moron.

lots of text---none of it made sense in support of your contention that McD disliked the Offense Daboll was running. Why on earth would he have an issue with a very successful offense that scored a lot of points? McD has no Offensive acumen, why would he care? How could be "uncomfortable with that"? your premise is flawed.

McD didn't like scoring all those points, huh? Genius...

Given his low football acumen, I understand your hesitation. My point was more that there is likely someone out there that would bring them forward, not backwards. I bet it's not a binary choice as you put it.

Why would you conclude that McD is the only HC who could keep this team from “going back”? this should be good…

under-appreciated masterpiece of inappropriate satire

"derpa, derpa, derpa"

wut? no

Best part was him celebrating these 2 straight up drops.

I just showed you 2 other QBs that had more carries and a lower fumble rate, so, no I'm not sure what you mean here. There is no connection between why a QB runs and if he fumbles. The majority of any QB's runs are not called plays. Some QBs/TEs/RBs fumble a lot, some hardly at all--this should be intuitively true. RBs fumble less than QBs not least because they protect the ball better by training. Danny Jones, who played under far more duress last season than Allen did last year AND had far less help than Allen did, had 120 carries to Allen's 124---yet only 6 fumbles to Allen's 13. Fields played on an even worse Offense, yet he had a lower fumble rate than Allen.

Bills have zero rings with 4 top 5 D's and Josh Allen.

He fumbled 13 times last year, the second most in his career.

Sure, no one is denying that Josh isn't getting the help he needs from his teammates and his coaches. That's not on topic. A ball carrier is a ball carrier, a fumble is a fumble. Once he takes off, the many reasons prompted him to chose to run don't have any impact on his ability to hold on to the ball. What you are suggesting makes no sense. Fields had 33% more carries last year and 31% fewer fumbles. Fields had 30% more carries but only 18% more fumbles. Both had a higher "success rate" (at least 40% of the yardage needed on 1st down, 60% needed on 2nd down and 100% needed on 3rd or 4th down) running the ball. There's no such thing as a separate "I'm not getting any help" fumble.

That's really not the point. A fumble is a fumble, not matter whether a called run or a scramble. The ball has to stay in the QB's hands either way, all the same. The "TO metrics" are expressed as INT rates (passing) and fumbles (rushing).

clearly not

absolute nonsense.

Mahomes (as you pointed out), Hurts and throw in Jackson, whos' typically in the 70's or so--the differences are insignificant and therefore it's easily imaginable. Your premise is faulty--it doesn't have to do with the "Offense he is expected to provide". Allen's INT% alone is higher than Mahomes, Jackson or Hurts---or Cousins (who accounted for 75% of Vikings yards last year) or.... then his INT rate should be as low as any of them. that would require 2 new threads