Now I am going to ask you if you read the story. The supreme court vacated the conviction because its a split verdict... Its not because of the individual merits of the case.
But he didn't though... The supreme court threw it out because its a split verdict--a backwards rule in louisiana that they ruled violates the sixth amendment. Its now up to the New Orleans prosecutor to decide if he wants to try this again.
Lol . I had to have read it to get the details on the bullets. Didn’t Hayes chase down Smith after the accident ? Also, a lot of this is he said she said because although Smith had a gun, it was still in his car untouched?
The whole notion of losing the locker room seemed silly. A number of articles mention the struggle with selection of the coaching assistants as a major conflict.
More like coach of the decade. 3 playoff wins in 10 years (no Superbowl appearances as well )despite having one of the more talented rosters in AFC during the period
Pissing off players in one game is not a sufficient reason to fire a coach. And tbh , Hurts was awful in the game so its not as if they benched someone who was performing at a high level. It seems that the reason may be that they see the deterioriation /mishandling of the team's ostensible franchise quarterback was a compelling reason to start afresh.
Hard to make plays when you are under pressure of close to half the snaps. Seattle's O line was no match for the Rams D.
Kind of interesting to see how a team that can run the ball and play good D beat a one dimensional pass happy team.
Yup. Indy is a solid team for sure.
Now to go off on a bit of a tangent, you are Phil the Thrill reincarnated? Why did you give up your other handle(s) on the date that you started posting on this one? Wifey caught you posting again on football forums after losing that 5 k on the Vikings?