prissythecat

He’s denying that he has all those kids https://clutchpoints.com/raiders-news-josh-jacobs-savagely-responds-to-insane-report-about-children/amp/

Ahh. An argument base on transitivity. Because we beat the shell of the Saints and the Saints beat the Bucs, we should beat the Bucs. Similarly, because we beat WFT and WFT beat the Bucs, we should beat the Bucs . I like it.

Weren't the Saints still reasonable talented when they faced Tampa? I think Kamara was still there and so was Jameis? We faced the corpse that was left after injuries. And WFT is actually a competitive team right now.

You stated that our offense is going to put up points . I countered that by highlighting that Tampa's defense can put a lot of pressure on the QB so seeing many points from the Bills was not likely. Then you go on a tangent and say Tampa loses games that they should win. In answer to that , I point out that Tampa has lost all of 3 games. So you are not winning any argument so far....

They are 9-3. And at the top of their division and likely will cruise into playoffs . They've performed a bit more consistently.

We scored 6 points vs Jags in Florida as they teed off on the passing game since we don't have a run game to be afraid of. Tampa gets to the quarterback quite a bit better than Jags. So I am not expecting many points on the board.

You should have seen what this board was like after bad losses during the drought. Lots of people who rarely posted would come out of the woodwork to offer many words of "wisdom"

A quick google search seems to indicate that a team that rushes for over 200 yards wins around 88% of the time . Passing for over 200 is not so meaningful .

Giving up over 200 yards on the ground, especially when you know the team is just going to keep handing it off is a disaster no matter which way you spin it. Lipstick on a pig.... Incidentally , what percent of teams giving up over 200 yards on the ground win games? I suspect its a very small percentage

Thanks for the nice write-up . I read on another thread though that the game was horrible to watch and that bad weather should result in postponement of football games.

It goes beyond this single thread. You just need to look at the thread history. Am sure not many people found the game entertaining if they were expecting chunk plays through the air. But New England certainly got quite a few chunk plays on the ground...

I feel sorry for someone like you who has very little self awareness on this board.

Football is meant to be played in the elements . No reason to call the game unless there is health and safety type threat. You are just putting up another LAMP.

I love how quite a few posters tried pointing out the past week that the Bills run defense was “good” and that we shouldn’t worry about Pats run ga,e.

206 yards rushing by Pats and it’s still the 3rd quarter

Pats getting 8.1 ypc on ground.

yes . The run defense we are used to seeing against Titans or Colts.

Poor San Fran. Held back by average at best QBing from Garropolo

to which team did those TDs go ?

Minshew might actually spark a better passing game. Hurts is not a very good passer though he does add that running dimension.

Perhaps we should make a pinned Billsfan1972 LAMP thread.

I believe you meant to post on the Patriots vs Bills predict the score thread? This is the Bills vs Saints thread...

The Packers knew that Rodgers was unvaccinated. They even tried to get him an exemption from the vaccination requirement based on his home brewed treatments.

Has to be sarcasm as the Seahawks are basically eliminated from playoffs at this stage?

Fair enough . That’s a reasonable take