Magox

So that's your response? Btw for you idiots... Alaskadarin hit the nail right on the head...it has to do with landmass, cost and economic feasibility...but please carry on with your strawman

Wow ..... What an incredibly ignorant post that h D no substantive vAlue

Democrats.com 'The aggressive progressives' hehe

Who did?

Agree with the entire post!

Inside 30 yard line "no room for slants" ???

You don't take out the run, it was part of the game! And I wasn't advocating run run run fieldgoal. I'm saying you go with what had been working, and play to your strengths, which is FJ and the short and intermediate passing game.

No, but you don't take away the 80 yard run, it was part of the game. Also, everyone seems to be missing the point, it wasn't about playing for a 3 and out field goal, it should of been about playing for a first down or two and fieldgoal. Our short to intermediate game was on. Look at Fit'z completion average, plus you add the fact that Jackson by far has been our MVP of this offense, you play to your strengths and you play the odds. 4 freaking minutes left at the 25, you play to milk the clock. And No, milking the clock doesn't mean run, run, run Fieldgoal. Milking the clock means game planning for a first down. There were a number of plays that we could of run that would of been relatively safe that could of gotten us to a first down. Listen, I love Gailey's aggressive nature, and I normally applaud it, and I'm happy as hell that he is our coach, but that was the wrong strategy. Odds are if we attempted to play for another first down or two, we would of succeeded and won the game.

I was having this conversation with my father shortly after the Bills mismanaged the last 4 minutes of yesterdays game. I told my father that this administration is the most politically motivated administration I have seen in my adult life and that I wouldn't put it past them to convince Hillary to get on the ticket once they realize that Romney and Rubio are pulling away from them in the polls. I believe it has at least a 30% chance of happening.

I disagree completely. You play the odds, you have first down at the 25 with 4 minutes left to play and they have two times out left. We've been running the ball effectively throughout most of the game, and you play for a first down. If the Bills get a first down in three plays, and we kick a field goal, at best they get he ball back around their 20 with about a minute left with no timouts. If we don't get the first down and kick a field goal, they get it back with about 2 minutes left and a couple time outs,and now the onus is on them to drive and score points. Even if we score,they would of had 4 minutes left to tie the game. Im not one to typically second guess, but we definitely had the wrong strategy at the end of the game.

IF, and that's a big if, If he were to know someone connected to the "inner-circle" of the W.H, then one thought comes to mind; "Never let them see you sweat". I mean, anyone with the capacity to think rationally knows that the Obama administration is most worried about a Mitt matchup. And if Mitt wins the nomination and chooses Rubio and RUbio accepts, "Turn out the light, the party is over"

I knew you'd chime in on this topic

Do you have a link to these exemptions? I would be interested in reading them if you.

Because disposable incomes matter much more as incomes go down. I could go into a long explanation as to why regressiveness matters and how it would impact our economy negatively, but frankly I just don't have it in me today to do so. So the initial statement that I made in this post pretty much says it all. And no, it doesn't complicate it that much at all. I don't see how one could use food, gasoline or their utility bill as a massive tax shelter to avoid taxes. Also, on a sidenote, when you see that his plan gets savaged over the next couple weeks, you'll see what I mean, even though you still won't agree with me. Good point, using the word "fair" sounds like a play straight out of the liberal playbook.

Actually, it's the other way around, try to keep up skippy.

I believe the "establishment" badge of shame branding matters more to partisans than independents. The economy is so bad right now, and many independents feel let down by this president, that from my perspective they are desperate for someone who could get this economy going. When you contrast the two, you have on one hand an eloquent speaker who has virtually no experience in how the economy works and on the other someone who has a proven track record in the private sector, I'm pretty damn sure you'll see Romney win over many more independent votes than Obama. My guess is that he'll win the independents by at least 5% and possibly over 10%.

We're still talking about your boyfriend Barney right?

I've been thinking about this plan a little more and I have added in a few things that would make it a bit more palpable. Income tax rate= Instead of taxing 9% to everyone, have it broken off to four subsections 3% for low income 7% for middle 10% upper income earners 13% for the wealthy National Sales tax Essentials such as food (grocery food, not dining),rentals, medicine etc should be excluded Gasoline and utilities 4% Corporate taxes stay at 9% Something likethis would make his plan less regressive, and would at least have some sort of a progressive tax rate on incomes, which would give it a much better shot of getting bipartisan support. Also the exclusions and deductions in the National Sales tax would be offset with the increases from the upper income and wealthy income taxes.

I don't give a **** what Juror says, they are definitely very concerned of a Romney matchup. You'd have to be a complete idiot not to be. They know that Independents have left his side for more than two years now, and they have't been able to bring them back, and that is a major concern for them. They were hoping that they would get a matchup againt Rick Perry, where they knew they would stand a much better shot at winning against in the swing states, where the independents decide who win. Now that Mitt is in the lead, you can see guys like Axelrod "incensed" and "disgusted" that Romney is coming out of these debates unscathed. Just use your common sense, it isn't that difficult to figure out, Winner of Independents = Our Next President You think Independents in Ohio or Florida are gonna vote for Obama again, over a candidate like Romney?

You could be given four legs and you still wouldn't be able to make a stand.

Excuse me for saying this, but every time I read one of your posts I can't help but think of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUyLwXhqlWU

Yes, and there is no place for you here.

(Park official) "Ok guys, you have to leave the park so we can clean it up a little, but then you can come back afterwards", (Protester) "You want to clean it? Hell no,"

Oh Please, You're just jealous You aren't in the middle of this cluster!@#$

So I see you are taking the "Na Na Ni boo boo, I can't hear you" approach.