-
Posts
19,186 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Magox
-
NYT: Gingrich threatening to boycott debates
Magox replied to UConn James's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Mitt was ready for Newt, and he finally gave the type of answers he needed against charges against his wealth, investments and taxes. He finally looked comfortable in his own skin. My guess is that he wins Florida by at least 5 points, barring no unforseen unforced errors. -
NYT: Gingrich threatening to boycott debates
Magox replied to UConn James's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Oh yeah, they know whats up, they know who the real Gingrich is much better than the general public. They worked with this guy, they know how erratic, egomaniacal, self-absorbed, delusional (I'm sure I'm missing a bunch of other adjectives) and unpredictable he is. They also realize that the ultimate liberal wet dream for this upcoming election cycle is a Newt vs Obama matchup. You see Larry Sabato's crystal ball prediction? Gingrich getting crushed and Mitt up slightly over Obama, and Larry Sabato is the best in the business. Think about this, this is with conservatives still not nearly coalescing around Mitt yet, wait until we get to July, and the Obama machine is applying their full court left wing press, conservatives are gonna be so outraged, that they'd vote ANYONE into office other than Obama, which means in the swing states, Mitt's numbers could be better than what we are seeing today. Btw, 5 out of the last 6 polls have Romney beating Obama in Florida, and in each o those polls, the best Gingrich does against Obama is down by 7. Yeah, that's the best he has. Also, anyone happen to catch Nancy's complete turnaround today? She pretty much said the Newt case is case closed. Hmmmmm, yeah, I can tell you what happened there, the Obama team called her up and said "What the !@#$ are you thinking??? Don't you see that we have attack ads against Romney in Florida? Don't you know this is who we are attacking, this is who we hope loses in FLorida? Knock it off!" -
NYT: Gingrich threatening to boycott debates
Magox replied to UConn James's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Wow! did you guys here pieces of Newt's stump tirade today? Dude went on an incoherent, diatribed rant today. Newt Unhinged! I predict tonite is gonna get really nasty tonite. -
Yeah, but he makes alot of money, so that makes him inherently evil, I mean Romney makes $21 M a year this guy makes about 30 times more, AND he's Retired!!! I'm sorry we can't take what this guys says seriously, afterall he represents the 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.1% Come on man! think of the 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%
-
A true sign of weakness.... admission of guilt
-
The Official Mitt Romney thread
Magox replied to Dave_In_Norfolk's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Those who have difficulty coping with their perceived lives injustices; complain, gripe and cry foul. Those who focus on themselves and the task at hand, usually are able to move forward. -
The Official Mitt Romney thread
Magox replied to Dave_In_Norfolk's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Wow! I see that your true colors are on full display for everyone to see -
Buffalo Bills Courting LB Courtney Upshaw and WR Marquis Maze
Magox replied to Sniper's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yeah, but look at the competition he was up against. I mean come on, it was only the SEC -
No, it wasn't as simple as that, not only was their lost production during that time period, but there is a residual loss that continues. You see, many of those rigs aren't owned by the oil companies, they lease them, and when they were sitting idle, some of the rig owners moved shop and other oil companies leased them in different deep sea locations. Rig leasing is in extremely high demand, companies pay top dollar for them, specially deep sea rigs, so when the moratoria hit, some of them dipped.
-
Both. But there were the cries of foul that somehow, Bush was funneling these high priced barrels in which they inferred he was responsible for, were for the benefit of his oil buddies in Texas, and it wasn't just a few morons, there were many.
-
I don't give a **** about all that, I'll leave that up to the morons, I'm just speaking facts and tellin it how it is.
-
The Official Mitt Romney thread
Magox replied to Dave_In_Norfolk's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I've figured it out, you listen to Sean Hannity on the radio during the afternoon (which I don't believe I have ever listened not even 1 minutes worth in my entire life) , you read artices on Redstate, you are in reality a hardcore rightwinger. This whole shtick you have of you know, acting like the biggest leftist moron is all a charade, you do this to tarnish liberals, to make them appear as if they just fell off of the turnip truck. Bravo Dave Bravo!!! -
What the !@#$ is wrong with this bitch
Magox replied to whateverdude's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
She's right! Newt will never ever ever be president of the U.S and the sooner you numbskulls realize that, the better the opportunity there will be to get Obama out of office. -
Yep, that wasn't a typo at all Dude, you must be getting tired. Get some sleep.
-
Yep, when it comes to pricing, markets, data and trends, not a single one of those dummies do. That's just how it is. Now keep drinking the kool-aid BD, cuz you know, thats just what you do.
-
I can tell you this, when it comes to oil, there isn't a politician in the U.S that knows about oil as much as I do. In regards to right wing rhetoric, I could give two ***** about that. The reality is that the presidens energy policies have had a relatively small effect on todays oil prices, I calculate somewhere between $3-5 a barrel, simply because of the moratoria of last year and the loss of rigs from that action. Having said that, his policies will have more of a long-term effect on prices because of the drilling restrictons and activist stance the EPA currently has. But, I do seem to remember a bunch of you leftists blaming Bush for the high prices of 08 and without even knowing you then , I'm pretty damn sure that you were one of those strawmen proponents back then that attempted to link the oil prices of 08 to his oil buddies in Texas But go ahead and tell me you weren't one of "those" guys. uh huh yeah So when I hear the ignorant attack on Obama and how he is to blame for the current price of oil, I just kinda sit back and think to myself, "the shoe is on the other foot now" and if I were a campaign strategist I would be just as disingenous in my attacks against Obama as they were the last election cycle.
-
What are we judging here? Is there something nefarious from the actions of Romney from the link you just provided, other than the characterization of the word "funneled" that the author of the link used?
-
Oil imports are down because consumption has gone down MAINLY because of the weak economy. The Presidents Energy policies have virtually nothing to do with the trends, Nothing! This is all happening in spite of the president, oil production projects and the new natural gas horizontal drilling explosion was all in place WELL before the president stepped into office. Now if you want to say that because of the presidents poor economic record, that consumption of oil has gone down, therefore lessening oil imports, then you may have a point. http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2012/01/what-obamas-first-ad-doesnt-say-111451.html Repeat after me: I drink the Obama Kool-aid because it tastes good.
-
There is a distinction, you're colorblind.
-
It's like me looking at a red shirt and I say, "hey, thats a red shirt" and you tell me, "that's not red, it's blue", and I'm like "listen here ****, I know what I'm looking at, and its !@#$ing red."
-
NYT: Gingrich threatening to boycott debates
Magox replied to UConn James's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
What a little kitty, waaaaaaaa -
Oh, memories
-
Geez, shouldnt of the Bidens of at least SAID and embellished their charitable donations by just a little bit more?