Magox

So that's what you got out of that website? Like I said, that's how you approach things, by using the "la la la la, I can't hear you, la la la" tack. There was a whole lot more than just cut and tax thats on that website, but you selectively decide to ignore the rest. That's just a reflection of either your lack of desire to want to know his plans are or your inability to comprehend what is in there. It's only one of the two, which is it? You stubbornly refuse to acknowledge his plans, or you simply can't comprehend what he is saying? Sorry, sensible thinking business people dont agree with you. What you consider "far right" is what the business community including corporations consider a pro growth and pro jobs agenda. But go ahead, keep living in insulated leftist ideologue world, if thats what makes you feel more comfortable, than I'm all for it.

You are one lazy dude. http://www.mittromney.com/jobs That wasn't so hard was it?

He has, but you're deaf and you would rather just go "la la la la, I can't hear you, la la la la la"

Although I do agree with some of what you are saying, your view is too simplistic, a defeatist perspective, that basically implies a black or white scenario, tilting heavily towards black. The reality is that there are many shades of grey in between and that there are policy prespriptions that can lead us to a long-term solution by incrementally leading us to lighter shades of grey. The president and his staff is a team comprised of a bunch of leftist ideologues, early on my criticism was that his administration had virtually no one that had private sector experience, and that I knew from the beginning that the Obama Whitehouse would be incapable of leading us to a solid sustained recovery, and guess what? Some of us were right. There is over two trillion dollars sitting on the sidelines from corporations, and if the president had any sort of business sense, he would work tirelessly in how to have them unleash and spend that money. But rather than do that, he is more concerned with the politics of "fairness" which contradicts in what makes a business want to grow. Even if you look past the corporations and them hoarding money through fear of uncertainty and higher taxes, small business polls show that regulations is what is inhibiting job hiring, not lack of demand. The president has failed and it's time for someone who actually understands business to finish the job he couldn't handle.

But but they killed Bin Laden.

Thanks to Obamas "Growth" Policies, he has successfully lowered the price of Gasoline over the past month. On a more related note to the original point of the thread, what I like what the Romney campaign is doing is that they are taking the fight to the Obama administration, this isn't like the McCain campaign, where McCain played mr. nice guy allowing himself to get bludgeoned by the Obama hit squad. That's what they thought was going to happen, they fully expected Romney to just take it, and they aren't doing that. The strategy is smart, it helps consolidate and galvanize the base in the early stages, solidifying and hardening support to help create passion and troops on the ground and as the campaign moves forward, more of the swing voters will begin to tune in and then at that point he can begin to pivot more to the middle, by touting his bipartisan record in MA, which is something that moderates and independents like hearing, which is something that the president has massively failed at during his presidency. http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/mitt-romney-fighting-moderate-wins-over-the-righ And with the lousy economy that Obama is incapable of turning around the way it should be, it's gonna make Mitt's job that much easier.

I understand what you are saying, but politics is a contact sport. The reason why the shouting down in this instance from my perspective extremely effective is because today was the launch of ATTACK ROMNEY part deux. The reason why that is significant is because as you probably know, campaigns want to win news cycles, and the news cycle that the Obama campaign wanted for today, was AxleRod going to Mass. and hammering his record, and then of course they would get lots of free coverage on all the News outlets, covering his attack on Romney. Instead of that, my guess is that at least half of the coverage won't be so much the substance of what Axlerod was saying, but an image of AxleRod getting visibly frustrated and stooping down to the same level of some protesters out on the street. This is yet another news cycle that Romney will win, on a day that was suppose to be seen as an important one for the Obama c campaign.

I had this discussion with JA earlier, I contended that ROmney would run a better general election campaign than what we saw in the Primaries, simply because his core is much closer to the middle than that of the most energized which are the far righties. As we all saw, the unveiling of the Bain attacks hasn't been nearly as effective as what the Obama campaign had hoped for, so now they are launching their new line of attack,which is focusing on ROmneys record as Gov. of Mass. Today was the first day, and it started with this on Morning Joe. Deval Patrick isn’t much of an attack dog. Yikes! However that is not as a result of Romney's campaigns doing, thats just someone who has a hard time demonizing ROmney. This next clip is all a result of ROmney's campaign. You gotta check this video out. This speaks to the agility of the Romney campaign. This was suppose to be a big day for the Obama attack campaign, and I can't get over how petulant and small Axlerod came off. He Actually told those that were protesting that they should "quiet down". The man was visibly frustrated

Learn something new every day. So I guess this thread did have some value for me afterall.

Im guessing you are done with doing work around the house.

These sort of subjects peak your interest. That's all.

Jboy, your sweeping generalizations of people from N.C is similar to those who do the same of the Muslim religion. Just sayin'

Wow, those two polls aren't even close to one another.

To equate "Muslims" as terrorists is absurd. If you qualified your point with extremist Muslims that would be one thing, but to categorize the entire religion is astonishingly ignorant.

Yeah, I believe Fitzpatrick has shown that he CAN get the job done. Having said that I do have my reservations, first I noticed towards the latter half of the year, that his confidence had gone down, you could see it in his body language. There were countless instances where I would see him walking onto the field before a drive with his head held down. So he's gonna have to get his MOJO back, thats first and foremost. The other area that I have concerns with him is his deep ball. Simply put, it's awful. I'm hoping he practices that long ball a good bit during the offseason, there were numerous opportunities for key plays during games and TD's that were squandered because of his woeful inaccurate deep ball. In regards to his "leash", well I think without a doubt that having Vince Young on the team made his leash that much shorter. It's tough to say when they would yank him, I don't believe you can accurately put a number on it. There are many variables that I believe Chan would look at, such as Wins/Losses, his performance with INT's/TDs, his accuracy, how the team is driving down the field and body language. I'd say that he is my biggest concern for the year for the Bills.

The justifications from your perspective for disqualifying them was because of where they were drafted?

Obama is showing a real profile of courage by campaigning in Wisconsin on behalf of Barrett and the Unions, for what is arguably the biggest election of the year, aside from the presidential election. He really has been putting it all on the line for them. http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/229485-unions-angry-with-washington-democrats-over-lack-of-help-in-wisconsin

One problem with that argument, Clinton signed the repeal in 99 along with the expansion of CRA.

I do agree, that the main risk this economy is facing right now, are outside of Obama's control. But hey, that's politics, I mean the 08 Obama campaign, blamed Bush's deregulation and tax policies for the financial crisis, and as a result, that crushed McCain. When I ask some of the mouthbreathing wingnuts from the left, which regulation did Bush deregulate that caused the financial crisis? Of course there is no plausible answer. Then when I ask, how did the Bush tax cuts cause the crisis? Then the answers get even sillier. The point is that, to a degree, if the economy slows down further, it probably would have a good bit to do with Europe. However, it's politics and the one at the helm is the one who usually the one held accountable. Having said that, the Obama's economy is a 2-2.5% GDP growth economy, it is a stagnant one that has virtually no dynamism or vigor to it. So what I would say is that if the economy remains the same as what we are seeing today, it will be a matter of who wins the messaging war. If the economy improves from where it is right now, Obama most likely win, if it slows, Romney wins.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76752.html#ixzz1vsx6XCCc

Well, I'm not going to answer that question, because that wasn't my point. Don't you think it's a bit hilariously hypocritical to on one hand criticize that private equity is a function that serves investors needs through short-term gains at the expense of middle-class workers and on the other hand, go visit a factory, and tout that factories importance to the economy that happened to be primarily funded through private equity? In other words, without private equity he wouldn't of even been there campaigning.

That's not the point, the point is that the Obama administration is ripping Private Equity, in the sense that the primary function of the business is to create wealth for it's investors at the expense of hard working people of the middle class. Here you have a case where Obama is set to tout this company in Iowa today in a campaign style speech, with money that the government provided, yet it was because of Private Equity, which funded the vast majority of the company that is making it all possible. This is dripping with irony.

You wanna read some funny ****? check this out Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/24/obama-visiting-wind-turbine-factory-where-private-equity-blows-govt-financing-away/#ixzz1vpo0zX2j You can't make this **** up