I don't know, I'm certainly no expert, but I would think that if you have the luxury to decide which DC is going to help lead your Defense, you go with the guy that has had success in "the scheme" that he is most familiar with.
That's fine if you are the HC... But if you have the luxary of choosing a DC, and you have personnel that is built more for the 4-3, then it doesn't make that much sense to choose a DC who has primarily coached the 3-4.
It matters, if you have a coach who has coached and led good defenses under a 3-4 for most of professional career, then ideally you would be hiring someone to help install a defense he has familiarity with.
Anyone notice that at the presser He said he'd like to thank Ralph Wilson and Russ and Buddy for giving him the opportunity to coach here. No mention of Doug Whaley.
People on both sides of the aisle vociferously defend seniors. No way in hell are politicians going to tell seniors that they shouldn't get any more or for that matter less care towards the end of their lives.
He sometimes annoys me the same way Chris Christie does... Christie needs to win re election in the blue state of NJ and has an ego larger than his physical stature, much the same way Scarborough is, they both have outsized egos who go waaaay out of their way to criticize the party they support just so that they can be liked from those in the middle. It's a show.
Actually, that's not what you were implying.
you responded to KD about this part of his post
Then you responded with this
\
In other words, you were saying that one is more acceptable than the other. Right?
It does, personally, I just believe you are internally coping with gays having a larger voice than they use to. I may be wrong, and it's not meant to be offensive, that's just what I believe.
If I were to accept the premise of your argument, than that would also mean that I also accept that homosexual activity shouldn't occur. Your argument is that one is more "acceptable" than the other. That doesn't make sense, it's either acceptable or not. The idea of treating one sect of the society with a different set of rules than another is discriminatory.