Magox

I didn't say it was a new concept, what I said was that it's not practiced that often.

When a Defensive or Offensive Coordinator gets hired to become a head coach of an organization, presumably its because that coordinator excelled in that role. It never made sense to me that as soon as they are hired that they pretty much give up what they were good at, outsource it to a new coordinator who often times they don't have previous working relationships with. I think if you see guys like McVay and Reid to name a couple, these guys still have very active roles in where they made their living and they've had good results doing so. I think we are beginning to see that with McDermott, yes its early to make any final proclamations but McD was a hell of a Defensive coordinator and I think you are seeing his style of defense playout with how the Bills have played the past few weeks. I think if I were the GM or owner of the organization and I were to make a new hire for head coach I'd want him to play a more involved role on what got him hired than what we traditionally see from head coaches. Thoughts?

The game vs the Raiders was the first time that I saw what it would truly look like to have a well balanced rushing and passing attack. It was methodical and with a purpose. The rush attack was beautiful, hitting them with good runs up inside with a RB that can bounce it to the outside and cause some damage. The effective ground game with the 2 TE setup chipping at their DE's along with the play action is the way. This is the sort of offense that wins championships, I just hope that Allen can remain patient and make good decisions.

That's awful. My thoughts are with his grieving family.

Disney drops all but free speech claim in political retaliation suit against DeSantis https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/07/disney-drops-all-but-free-speech-claim-in-political-retaliation-suit-against-desantis.html

That's because he's slick and he doesn't actually believe half the things he says. Vivek of today could have an amazing debate vs. Vivek of just 6 months ago. You can find these sort of lies, fables and flip flopping comments that Vivek says almost daily. I’ve never seen so many provable lies and flip flops from a politician in all my life. Enough to make John Kerry blush

Josh is just fine, the Bills are too. We have just about as good a chance at winning it all as anyone else.

For that it doesn’t matter much. Where it matters if he’s out a few games and your backup can help win a couple. That could be difference between making playoffs or gaining home field advantage.

Two more polls showing DeSantis with a pretty big bump after the debate. Vivek, pretty flat. That's just because most of his supporters are supporters of Trump.

In Iowa it won't hurt him or for that matter SC. But, there are some states that believe it will hurt his electability in a general. Some of his donors don't like that he did the 6 week abortion bill. However, he isn't forcefully saying it, he's trying to kind of have it both ways but if you hear what he says, he would leave it up to the states to decide which is the right approach. When they press him on it, he basically just says "I will be a pro life president".

Believe it or not, they weren't. That number that you see that they keep throwing out is a completely fabricated number. All that means is how many times it showed up in someone's feed. So the same person could just scroll through it a number of times and that person could have hundreds of views in a short time period. Specially when you take into account that Elon pinned it on his X account. There were only about 14 million who watched at least 2 seconds of it and about 7% of those 14 million which is about a million watched the entire video. So 1 million for Tucker and 13 million for the Debate. In terms of DeSantis, yes he's kind of a quirky dude. And he does use some canned lines, no doubt about it. If I were on his team, I would just suggest to him to not have any rehearsed lines and speak naturally. There is no one on that stage that can speak to the substance as well as DeSantis. I've been watching him for years and when he does interviews, the dude is just straight up knowledgeable about these topics. He needs to embrace his inner nerdiness and speak substantively which is he more than capable of doing. However, they set out what they wanted to do which is talk about the things they care about and let that huge audience of 13 million hear it. Have a listen to that Mark Levin 6 minute segment I put up above. DeSantis won his initial race by less than 1 point against at that time a rising African American star in Gillum. lol He transformed that state into a plus 1 state into a plus 19, so they aren't a swing state any longer. Wisconsin is a state I believe tailor made out of those 3 for DeSantis. A lot of suburbs which Trump struggles with where DeSantis would do much better and his credentials should do well in the rest of the state aside from the cities of course.

Yes, it's difficult to after DeSantis on substance and policy. You aren't going to outflank him from the right, you aren't going to go after him on his ability to win a purple state and you most definitely aren't going to go after him for getting ***** done that us righties care about. He's bar none the most accomplished person running along with Trump. I'd argue more impressive wins than Trump but we can leave that argument for another day. Check out what Mark Levin today just had to say about about DeSantis. It's a 6 minute clip. He also happens to share a similar view of some of what I said on Vivek, that he's an empty slate that talks of doing revolutions when in fact he hasn't done squat for righties and the only one on that debate stage that has done things is DeSantis.

I can't speak to others but I won't misquote him and I can assure you that there are tons of positions that he has taken that he did not hold just 6 months ago. This right here speaks exactly to what I was just saying. It looks like this polling data matches that.

It's not that he's misquoted, it's that he doesn't have a true core. He says what people want to hear.

I agree pretty much with everything you said. Let's not kid ourselves, Trump is the heavy favorite and most likely going to be the nominee. There is a lot of goodwill for him among Republicans, with that said he's not invincible. He has by far the highest floor out of all the candidates which I'd say is probably around 30% in Iowa/NH/SC, and then there is another 30% considering him of which at this moment he has around 1/3 of them on his aside according to more credible pollsters. But, DeSantis does have almost as many people considering him as Trump and GOP voters do like him aside from the 10-12% that consider themselves MAGA/TRUMP Republicans and the eunuch/moderate/Neocon/NeverTrumpers. The problem for DeSantis is that he hasn't been able to coalesce some of the more moderates and normies. Christie pretty much owns the eunuch/Neocons, Scott/Haley/Burgum have a chunk of the moderate/normies. DeSantis is a pretty hard right dude, and the only way he will be able to defeat Trump is if those voters that prefer Scott/Haley/Burgum make a calculated choice to maybe not go with their top guy but go with who can defeat Trump. Vivek has a very low ceiling. He appeals to Trump, Ron Paulish and some low propensity voters. He's not going to eat into Trump's base, but maybe some of those that are considering Trump/DeSantis/Vivek. Aside from that, he will never get any meaningful amount of moderate and normie types which make up a decent bit of the party. There aren't enough votes for him to be had, the only way he can do that is by taking away the voters that are already in Trump's and to a much smaller degree DeSantis side. Which btw, why is Vivek even running. if he considers Trump the greatest president of the 21st century? https://www.politico.com/video/2023/08/24/vivek-ramaswamy-praises-trump-best-president-of-the-21st-century-1037286

To a degree, but he acknowledged that there is climate change and that humans contributed to it. That's a far cry from "Climate change is a hoax". I've been posting on this board for years, I just have been M.I.A for a couple years on PPP side, the posters on here that know me know that I don't just spout nonsense. From his positions on masks, vaccines, Juneteenth holiday, Mike Pence, J6, Trump, Soros and a whole bunch of other topics, which I'll share, you'll see that he's not a genuine person. He has no track record for delivering for conservatives/righties, his only record he has is his very questionable and shady practices with his pharmaceutical/biotech companies (which I'll share one day as well) and his record of tons of flip flopping inconsistent views which coincidentally happened right before he entered the race. He says he's not a politician, technically that is true. But, he certainly behaves like a career politician.

Ok, you asked for it lol He was invited to speak to congress on "Climate change and Social Responsibility" His part starts at around the 39:15 mark You can hear what he says in its totality, his entire interview. https://www.cbsnews.com/video/entrepreneur-vivek-ramaswamy-on-the-takeout-352023/ This is where he says Now that you got to see the videos where he has done a completely 180 in a matter of 5 months from "Climate change is real and is partially due to humans" To "Climate change is a hoax" Do you think he did some new research in the past 5 months that led to his newfound view? What do you think caused his 180 view on Climate change? Serious question

It's not editing a video, he said that Climate change is real and that humans are partially responsible. Now, 5 months later he says it's a hoax. Did he do new research on his own and come to a different conclusion? https://www.mediaite.com/politics/vivek-ramaswamy-called-the-climate-change-agenda-a-hoax-on-wednesday-a-year-ago-he-said-it-was-an-important-question/ You can find the videos of those comments in the link. They are not selectively edited. If you want to dismiss all the flip flops he has made in just the past 6 months that is your prerogative.

He's as big of a fraud as they come. There are over 30 of these examples that he changed his positions in just the year alone He didn't poll the best and his net favorability dropped by more than anyone after the debate. Vivek PharmaSwampy lol

Of course he is, he's Trump's top cheerleader that is running in this race. It was always the plan. Things like this is what make Vivek unlikable aside from the fact that he doesn't believe half the things he says

This is the first post debate poll commissioned by 538/IPSOS/WP, it polled 775 Likely voters and caucus goers and it polled people before and after the debate. It only measured people who watched the debate. DeSantis first with 29% and Vivek second with 26% of "Who won the debate". I'd venture to guess that the majority of Vivek's 26% are identify as MAGA Trump Republicans who won't vote for him anyway. This was interesting, you can see inside the internals that DeSantis despite being by far the most attacked candidate with over $20M against him in paid attack ads, Trump constantly bashing him and the Corporate legacy media who loathes DeSantis is viewed most favorably by GOP voters. Btw, DeSantis is consistently at or near the top in favorability poll after poll. Interesting Nugget, people who didn't have an opinion of Vivek going into this debate, his net favorability fell by - 9 which is more than anyone else. I'm guessing its because he comes across as annoying and slick to most people. According to this poll and the people who watched the debate, more people are considering voting for DeSantis than anyone else, including Trump. Trump actually lost 5 points from people they polled right before the debate to the people after the debate. Haley had the biggest gain of +17 of who are considering voting for her. I knew she'd do well in the debates even though I don't align with some of her positions.

Just out of curiosity, Is this a troll account?

Yeah, apparently Jay thought it was a positive tweet from him lol.

Many signs pointing to Tre White bridging the gap of what he once was. Certainly looks a lot better than last year, I find it highly implausible that he gets moved this year. What team would want to trade for a guy coming off an ACL and a team eager to moving him? He will be with the team this year and if he performs well he will be back again the following year.