Jump to content

dwight in philly

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dwight in philly

  1. it really sucks that i still dont think we win with edelman at QB for the pats. .. crissakes this is terrible being a fan right now
  2. number 5 seems plausible.. i love hughes.but i have seen number 5 play out before
  3. mine are all obvious, probably not too insightful, but i thought hughes was good, darby ok.. colton schmidt, fantastic.. and tyrod seemed befuddled, if anyone hurt themselves, it was roman.. brutal.
  4. not sure if you are in buffalo , but if you are the obvious is pizza, and any will do.. also a wegmans sub cut up works. people in buffalo take for granted what great food there is.. trust me .. living in the philly area, food is very pedestrian.
  5. i agree, and it was how i perceived the team.. so.. just line them up and play.. i guess no , or low expectations can only make the season enjoyable if things go better than expected....
  6. a good omen.. last year tony gonzales picked them to go to the super bowl.. heath miller said last year he thought the bills would start 9-0 , so it is irrelevant.
  7. wiki leaks drop cannot come soon enough.. hopefully it has evidence that is rock solid against her..
  8. http://therightscoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/megynkelly.jpg
  9. well said.. it is all about the democrats stacking the deck.. it is obvious..
  10. i cannot believe the nonsense i read, thats why. and the old relic of voter ID laws to stifle votes is nonsense, regardless .so all of a sudden this GOP politician is credible? you found one huh?
  11. so, an election won by having more votes is somehow tied to voter ID ? so all the people who voted legally should have their votes discarded because the losing candidate feels that "his voters" were hampered by the fact they couldnt find the energy to get an ID ? as in this case, is required?
  12. why? because the GOP candidate , projected winner, will have more legal votes than the other?
  13. i would say that is more of an opinion than factual.. it gets tiring seeing the predictable hand-wringing without any facts.. just opinions.. as far as what i seek, is people need to stop deflecting.. a tactic people use when their case is really weak.. or has never been ok
  14. what the ;point is you are trying to make? u didnt bring the topic up about reagan.. but you chose to answer my question and have no friggin clue what you are talking about.. reagan made a speech.. left out AIDS.. ok.. carry on.. why not focus on your inaccuracies and continue? how in the hell is that perintent to this.. thats where im lost
  15. i will ask you about "AIDS and the gays while reagan was in calif?" what happened.. very curious clue me on.. what does that mean ?
  16. jeez.. pretty much a common sense response? lets wait for The hyperbole. now isnt that insulting! "stupid reply".. ? chalk up an L.. for u.. try a bit harder .. insults are a lazy way ..
  17. wow! the mention of "trump" again! as i said on saturday, how is this not been moved? once the partisanship starts.. it sure does take away the purpose of this.. despite all the "brainiacs" on here pontificating.. their B S..
  18. im not familiar with the absentee voting policy.. isnt there a requirement of some sort or justification one must have to receive an absentee ballot?
×
×
  • Create New...