dwight in philly

REALLY NOW!..." commander in chief", hard to reconcile that when it comes to him

seems like "alot" of people have too much time on their hands .. who gives a sh-t.. really..

i agree, who really gives a sh-t what espn, or any of the national media thinks?, i used to get as pissed as anyone, but i have come to the conclusion, tradition has taken a back seat to glitz. the bills deserve to be ignored, but the love affair with the jets, rex ryan, jerry jones, tony romo, all the usual suspects, does get tiring. it sure makes watching the sunday pre-game shows tedious, as does watching the bills. it seems the glory days were a dream.

i think there is way too much coverage of non-football related stuff!, pft.com is pretty decent, but i think it tries to create, or, overblow , a story.

could not agree more!, this should be a non-story, really, i am quite sure there have been way worse Q&A'S over the course of the "football e v a l" process. too much of a TMZ mentality for me.

get adams or gaither, do not trust bell's injury situation, feel the bills could be competitive, who knows?

i agree with your optimistic outlook. its the only way to approach the season. i feel that if we win the 7 at home, and the T O "home game", anything is possible. establishing the ralph as a place that teams do not want to come to is very important. staying away from the incredible injuries that we have endured would be nice. i am a "half-full" guy about the bills, felt last season was lost in the opener. beating the pats would have set the stage, perhaps changed the mind-set of the team. i, as always, anticipate nothing but the best. have to, or what is the use?

so that explains it!

why not, i cannot see him being the problem, after all, the bears gave up alot of picks for cutler, were in a recent super bowl, highly doubt he was a problem. i could see him as modrak's replacement.

i am for anything that will upgrade the team, and adams would be. i am concerned with the present, while not ignoring the future, an attitude must start somewhere, a culture of winning has to start. we had it with kelly and co, must re-establish it.

any chance wang could also be a long snapper?

attitude is what i want on our D, i think thomas would bring it, much like i thought porter would. i say why not, let it sort out in training camp.

nick, now that you left GR, can you now say that andy roth, your previous boss, has an anti-bills agenda?, it seems the sabres are the fair haired team and its open season on the bills.

when you are used to expecting the worst, what can one expect, i like the spiller and wang pick , hope levi is the deal, but will just wait it out, lots of failures everywhere, every year. too early to tell

do we line up.. levitre, wang, then wood? or is it levitre, wood, then wang?

bring in garcia, let the 4 of them battle it out, see who is left standing, OR, swallow any bit of standards you may have and try to get big ben..

there are obvious options, flozell adams, move levitre , pick up faneca to replace him, i am starting to feel very good again .. about time!

i know we arent in need of a safety, but nate allen is the real deal.. hate to pass on him,im sure they will.

thats what makes me so paranoid, chris ellis.. yikes!, but i keep telling myself , buddy knows his football!

i say its worth a gamble if the price is right, why not?, like i said, nix should know. highly doubt he would take a chance on him if he thought he did not have some game in him.

espn is saying both mcfadden and merriman could be dealt. i wonder if buddy thinks merriman has anything in his tank, what could we afford to give up. when he brings it he is a difference maker.

believe it or not, it did have the 50 patch on it, it really is nice.

brought an owens white throwback last year in august for 20.00 on e-bay.

i hope a complaint thread is not needed!, but then again i think the bills are going to the playoffs at the start of every year.

i like your theory on not taking a tackle, agree with you and nix. however, i am convinced they get a QB sooner than later.