dwight in philly

i agree, cannot say it enough, that money grab is hideous. giving up the home field at the ralph is huge. could never see an owner like kraft, jerry jones doing it. i know the markets are bigger and all that bulls-t, the need to "regionalize" , just do not like it!

my feelings exactly, kelsey is established and 97 does have a history to it.

i would be estatic if we got him, i want an impact guy, he fits the bill.. i remember all the negatives said about clay matthews, i say if he is there, TAKE HIM!

i agree, cannot stand the "pie in the sky" attitude of whatever politician is proposing this. every so often, somebody wants to get some pub, i say ignore it, re-hab the ralph and be done with it! ameneties, whatever, dont give a sh-t, i just want a football venue to continue the buffalo tradition of the elements, etc.

good! they finally get it right, keep them this way!

absolutely hate the toronto money grab. the fans from toronto who are bills fans, prefer to come to the ralph. the money that ralph paid for mario is there regardless of the toronto game. please! i for one, do not want to give up the edge that the ralph gives us..

nice call metz.. awesome.. whether they sign him or not, good source..

could not have happened to two better owners! i am loving this.. i wonder if both, will accept it gracefully?? but talking about making someone's day!

LOL!

1-green bay, 2- buffalo, 3-K C.. case closed.. stamp it final sale!.. paid in full.. the article is total bullsh-t..

if that was what his thinking was, then i agree with him, i am sure we all feel that way.. im glad they(the bills) are on the upswing, but until they truly win again, the jokes will continue.

yea, i know exactly what you mean, nobody has a thinner skin than me when it comes to buffalo, or the bills being the punchline, but i doubt he writes it that way if the bills were in fact, decent.

at first glance i kind of got pi$$ed off, but in reality, the culture that wilson and co have been responsible for the past decade certainly warrants that kind of response. until the bills become relevant, it will continue, hopefully for not much longer.

i would rather watch an old tony robbins rerun infomercial than watch obama pontificate..

yoo hoo .. metz! you there ? well, i do not BLAME obama, but i am quite sure the other networks probably pleaded with goodell to change the game because who would watch an obama speech opposite the NFL ?( ok maybe rachel maddow and the rev al) , they(obama campaign) and the the rest of the networks would not want to deal with the ratings being so poor..i think low ratings would reflect poorly on our commander-in chief..

i did forget!!! she could work, but the more i think about it, ZAMFIR, the panflutist sounds better.. just think about that line-up!

with michael bolton.. sure

yanni and john tesh together..after wayne newton sings the anthem

i did like that one, makes me wonder if only that had that kind of stuff back in the glory days of the 60's , a poster of sestak, dunaway, mcdole and tom day would have been awesome..

no

kick the ball out of bounds against tennesee in 99, take the penalty and hope you hold them for one play from the line of scrimmage.

on that premise you are probably correct, i guess it comes down to having the disposable cash to be able place that type of bet. if one takes a flyer on that bet, i think they deserve better odds and obviously vegas is not going to give them.

ok then! i guess i jumped the gun, but i still think the first score being a safety deserves better odds than 50-1.