no one has made that argument
Trying to prove a point of why should responsible law abiding citizens have things taken away because the actions of criminals
this. Guns are out there. Period. The criminals will ALWAYS find weapons to use on victims. Why should law abiding citizens not be allowed to defend themselves and family
When are the fast and furious documents going to be released?
Will Obama ever release his college transcripts?
Will Obama ever explain his deal with rezko? Ayers ? Wright ?
Who is responsible for the repeated national security leaks ?
Most transparent administration ever.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised anymore that the media looks after their own and gives BO another pass. They make a bigger deal about Romney being honest about the Olympics but ignore Obamas blunders
What does everyone think about the intent of the 2nd amendment actually ensuring private citizens the ability to keep and bear arms to protect their freedom from a potential authoritative and freedom restricting government ?
I just heard the whole clip to get his remarks in context and he sounds spot on and honest over real justifiable concerns. The media is making a big deal over nothing.
The media coverage double standard on Obama and Romney is unmistakable
Logic and reason doesn't apply to connor. I stand by my statement that these vests had no ballistic protection. I suppose to someone easily frightened by words like gun or tactical they would quickly jump to misinformed conclusions to push an anti gun agenda.
These vests are the same type used by airsoft players to SIMULATE a tactical/military look but having no ballistic protection properties. There is no !@#$ing armor in his vest. Average citizens CANNOT buy body armor in stores.
I'm not wrong connor is.
Where do you get your info ? That couldn't be more wrong and misinformed.
He did not have military grade body armor.
He had a Frigging vest on that had pockets to hold extra magazines /tools /maps etc...with no ballistic protection.
A 9mm or .40 caliber pistol round would have shredded the front and back of his vest with exit wounds.
More garbage from ill informed media and people who have an agenda to take guns because they are ignorant
And no, I don't even own a single gun.
Mildly off topic and all but somewhat relevant.... if my currently blue light effected memory is correct I believe the intent of the constitution was to allow private citizens the ability to bear arms to protect themselves from the possibility of government becoming intrusive into their lives.
Criminals have guns, will get guns and will use them regardless of the law, bans, gun free zones etc... they break the law already do you think a gun free zone will stop them ? All that means is they know no one there can stop them