Jump to content

bobobonators

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bobobonators

  1. http://www.nj.com/education/2016/01/nfl_schedule_unfair_rutgers_professor_says.html#incart_river_mobile_home It's sad we couldnt take advantage.
  2. Look at it this way. What is Robert Woods capable of? Last year he put up 699yds; 5TD's. Considering he's 23yrs old and in the thick of his prime, I'd say he can still do better. Lets look at other #2 WR's on playoff teams: Bengals' Marvin Jones: 816; 4TD's Pitt's Wheaton: 749; 5 TD's Texans' Cecil Shorts: 484; 2 TD's Chiefs' Albert Wilson: 451; 2 TD's Skins' Garcon: 777; 6TD's Packers' D. Adams: 446; 3TD's Panthers' T. Ginn Jr. as the #1 this season: 739; 10TD's; or Corey Brown as the #2: 447; 4TD Cardinals Floyd: 849; 6TD's Woods' numbers last season are right there with almost all of these #2's around the league (and Woods played on a bad team, not a playoff team with HOF's passing him the ball)...same thing applies to Atlanta, Dallas, etc. Again, he's 23yrs old and his arrow can still point up. For people that claim they want an upgrade over Woods: where is that "upgrade" coming from? Furthermore, in this run-first offense with a superstar #1 WR in Sammy Watkins, just how many chances do you think this new #2 is going to actually get?
  3. In all fairness to Woods. Theres a reason why hes a "#2" and not "#1". How many second WR in this league demand double coverage? When AJ Green goes down are they double teaming Sanu? Same thing in Dallas. Same thing detroit. Same thing in Houston. Etc etc. All these teams suffer tremendously when their star WR goes down. If Clay can step up his game, Sammy, Clay, and woods are more than enough. Getting Clay to perform at the level of a top 5-7 TE would do wonders for this offense
  4. Someone should do a study on the effects all these supplements these players take since they are 15yrs old. High school football players have an entire GNC cabinet in their lockers.
  5. I don't think the Broncos will win. Like others have said, the Patriots are finally healthy at WR and it makes a world of difference now for Brady. The Pats also have an underrated defense - no superstars really but they play well as a unit. Only way I see Broncos winning is if they catch a couple of breaks on tipped balls for turnovers or win big on special teams.
  6. BAHAHAH. Maybe he slept with the kid's mom?
  7. I actually don't think Cam comes off as selfish.
  8. I can think of plenty of players that are more selfish than Cam: 1. DeSean Jackson 2. Half of the Bengals defensive starters 3. D. Murray 4. AP Off the top of my head.
  9. LMAO..I get TMJ disorder just from looking at him.
  10. He's come a long way from his days at Auburn, IMO. He's much more likable now. I personally didn't like him in college - seemed like a spoiled punk. But I had to keep things in perspective..a lot of people in college seem that way. I feel Cam has grown up as a player and as a person.
  11. I thought only Bills QB's made plays like the one RW just did.
  12. when this pats offense gets going, it's hard to stop no matter how good the defense is.
  13. Yup yup. Fundamentally sound team.
  14. Didnt TT have less INTs than Smith? Maybe they based it on 16 games.
  15. LOL..yup! Billick is one tall dude. What is he 6'5? He's like 30yrs older than anyone there and still 3-4" taller HAHHA..i just Wikipedia'd Billick and it says he's 6'5"...damn
  16. Neither. You can't make an accurate determination because you're using different data sets. It's technically possible that QB B ends up throwing 60 TD's in 100 passes..or he could throw 35 TD's in 100 passes. You just don't know at this point so you can't state who is "better". It's unfair to QB B to project QB A as better b/c QB A was given twice as many opportunities...and it's equally unfair to say QB B is the same or better because QB A was given more opportunities and still performed at a high level regardless. However, you can project that QB will throw 50TD's in 100 passes - because that is what he's on pace for. IMO the only reason RW isn't on here is because it would undermine the argument. Because there is absolutely no reasonable, objective explanation for RW's omission.
  17. This. RW led the league in rushing for QB last season and has ranked near the top every season hes been in NFL. Its a no-brainer. Mike Vick? If you want to leave Smith/Rodgers out i can begin to understand that argument. But no way should RW be left off.
  18. This is a topic about PFF naming him breakout player of the year. If you want to continue on with how bad he was this year you can carry on in another thread not designed to !@#$ing acknowledge his accomplishment.
  19. LMAO. Look, more fanboy articles with more flaws: http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/buffalo-bills-tyrod-taylor-nfl-history-record-rushing-yards-passer-rating-011516 The only thing thats flawed in this entire thread is derailing what TT accomplished this season.
  20. This the thing: TSW isnt saying he had a good year - PFF is saying he had a good year. Are they fanboys too? Did TSW select TT for the Pro Bowl? These fanboys you speak of must have a lot of pull. Or, could if simply be that TT had a pretty damn good year and people that follow the NFL - other than Bills fan - acknowledge he had a pretty damn good year. So for the 100th time what is there to not be excited about? Can we as fans be excited about something QB related for once? Nobody here is saying hes the second coming of Aaron Rodgers. But it still doesnt take away from all the positive he did this season.
  21. Im not mad. Look at my posts. Last I checked the NFL isnt a tennis match where TT plays Kirk Cousins. Point is you hijacked what should have been a positive thread with your complaining. You disagree with the award. Too bad.
  22. Why are you so mad dude? This thread celebrates one of the few positives from this season - and TT is a positive from this season - an youre on here sounding like one angry mofo. Read ur posts. Nothing but smart ass remarks and pure anger. I dont get it.
×
×
  • Create New...