bobobonators

sexy rexxxxxyyyyy

HAHAHA

Which Rivers will show up? The turnover machine? That is primary concern I have with SD.

I'm just curious, but will these "garbage time" stats count for Brees? Or do they stop keeping stats after the 2nd quarter here? I remember that being a very important point for Tyrod haters last season. hey look! a really high throw for a WR in the end zone and it was caught! Was that a good pass or a bad pass by Brees?

I'm really looking forward to this game. 1. How will Lynn do with San Diego? I think San Diego has a lot of talent and can make some noise in a ridiculously tough division. We also play San Diego this season @ San Diego. I'm rooting for Lynn, except when he plays us. 2. We play Denver this year too and I'm curious to see just how good/bad their offense is going to be. Luckily we get Denver @ home this season.

Elite is right. Hall of fame lock. No doubter. His career numbers are almost like a video game. But hey, at least he got that 1, unlike Marino...or Kelly.

is this sean payton's last season with Saints if they finish 7-9 or worse again?

Thank you, I should've searched better prior to starting it.

agreed..it's not like the Saints D has stopped the Vikings either.

I don't know if it's voodoo or what, but Saints at home are a different team.

It is crazy. Also don't forget, that includes games started by EJ. Drew Brees has played every single one of those games except for 1. Their current run is crazy. I hope they leave some in the tank for October.

Minnesota I think

Yup. Last 3 seasons: 7-9; 7-9; 7-9. Worse winning % than the Bills.

Exactly the same with me.

HAHA

ah, was this posted already?

I picked the Vikes, but more importantly had Diggs on my fan duel for the week and he just won it for me. I find myself rooting for Vikes quite often.

https://www.maxim.com/sports/bills-fans-public-blow-jobs-2017-9 oh. boy... "MULTIPLE REPORTS OF IN-STADIUM SEX AT BUFFALO BILLS GAME CONFIRMS THAT THEY HAVE NFL'S WILDEST FANS"

1. Calm down. Im about as positive as they come. 2. If you wouldve read what I wrote you wouldve notice my critique of Hughes and Dareus goes well beyond 1 game. We're talking about a sample size of dozens of games now. And the one game yesterday was simply an extension of that. 3. Dareus may be 3 years older but hes still in his prime. Hughes just turned 29. Kyle williams is 34 and still bringing it.

So TT didnt have a below average/bad game yesterday?

It was by no means an acrobatic catch. He just had to make it a smidge behind his body. It was not high. Not low. Literally eye level to his left shoulder. The hit came after he already missed it. It hit his hands at eye level within the radius of his left shoulder pad. Its a clear drop to me.

I agree. Great thread overall.

I disagree. Dareus had 7.5 sacks and 10 sacks at the DT position before he fell off the face of the earth. As such, he was paid like a DT that should get 7-10 sacks each season. And not just as another space eating DT. Dareus isnt wilfork who is just there to stuff the run. Hes not paid to do that. 2 of the 3 highest paid players (17% of our salary cap) on this team are on the DL. That alone dictates that we SHOULD have a DL that can step up and get pressure without having to blitz. Including Kyle Williams, 3 of our top 8 highest paid players (vs the cap) are on the DL. Almost 23% of our entire cap to 3 players. We need more production from Dareus and Hughes.

You may be right. Something to keep an eye on going forward.