
All_Pro_Bills
Community Member-
Posts
6,892 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills
-
New records released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) reveal that Hunter Bidenβs firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners, exchanged over 1,000 emails with the office of then-Vice President Joe Biden during the Obama Administration. So much for never discussing and not knowing anything about his son's business activities. Or 200 more emails remain hidden due to the Biden White House citing executive privilege. βRelease would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors,β NARA claimed. So Joe Biden was sharing e-mails with Rosemont Seneca that contained confidential advice given to the VP. So did Joe violate document handling rules by disclosing "secret" government correspondence 200 times? No worries, its not like he read anything out loud to other people like Trump is said to have done. But still no evidence!
-
How Do All of Us Get Inner City Dads Involved?
All_Pro_Bills replied to Irv's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Men and women are both capable of making good and bad choices and unfortunately when they make bad choices its usually the children that suffer the most. And this toxic masculinity fantasy is dreamed up by feminists fighting "the patriarchy" portraying men as irredeemable and immoral hapless idiots, dependent on "strong" empowered women for guidance on proper conduct. -
I'm all for answers. But my problem isn't so much what Jared and Hunter did or didn't do. Their actions are secondary to the real problem. My problem is the way the media and political establishments acted and reacted to the stories. From the beginning the Kushner/MSB arrangement was scrutinized and questioned. While the Hunter/Joe Biden story, initiated with the laptop, was painted as some kind of Russian dis-information conspiracy by 51 former IC members, the MSM and social media. And anybody raising objections or disagreeing with that conclusion got steamrolled. I can agree with you that the payments and arrangements need to be clarified in both cases. But in the case of Biden, the supporting cast of political and media operatives that willfully lied, obstructed, and censored the truth need to be called out on the carpet to provide some real and truthful explanations for flying cover.
-
That's still not equivalent to bribes and payoffs. To this point everything appears to be legal. Do you have proof these are legal violations? If we want to discuss and agree there might be some ethical issues we can certainly do that. if you're on a fishing expedition to find crimes then you're coming up empty. File a complaint with the SEC.
-
Its still not equivalent. Its a publicly disclosed and legal investment into a registered fund. What are the terms and arrangements? Sure I'm curious but its a private arrangement between two parties and its nobody's business as long as the law is being followed. Which clearly appears to be the case. Might there be some ethical questions? Sure but that's another issue altogether than legal violations.
-
One of the village idiots started this topic as a distraction and to present an apples to apples argument of an apples to oranges situation suggesting taking bribes and payoffs from foreign entities in return for as yet unknown political favors while laundering those payments through various shell companies and accounts and then distributing those funds to multiple parties, including the former VP's son and to the former VP himself, to use the funds for personal use and supporting a lavish lifestyle was equivalent to managing a registered private equity investment fund which took in investment money from a specific foreign official, namely Saudi MBS. Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter? Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal. But hey, even though they know its true, nothing short of torturing a confession out of them will ever convince some folks to admit it. I don't need to name them, do I? There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic.
-
Impeachment or not, the Democrats face the choice of letting a damaged incumbent President run for re-election or making the hard choice of dumping the incumbent and replacing him with another candidate acceptable to the radical extremists for 2024. My expectation is he's going to be "encouraged" to drop out well before the first primary happens. California governor and liberal aristocrat Gavin Newsom is one potential replacement.
-
By the look of his wasteline Trump isn't doing much running lately. I don't have a lot of confidence in conservative scholars and that sect. They prefer to run a nice regular guy like Mitt Romney, supporting forever wars, interference in the affairs of other countries, big spending government (while claiming fiscal responsibility when in the minority) and big corporate globalization efforts to offshore Ametican jobs and businesses, while graciously losing by 35 or so electoral votes
-
Because idiots think just claiming it was an insurrection 100 times makes it one and fantasize that 14A will keep Trump from running. Why do the Dems have such an obsession to keep Trumpoff the ballot while at the same time they say he can't win? They should be welcoming his participation if they believe their own story.
-
Smith's J6 charges are double jeopardy as defined in A5. "Nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be put in jeopardy of life or limb." The Semate acquited Trump of all J6 charges under the House articles of impeachment. Smith's charges are moot. They are materially similar and refernce the same act. You can't be charged with conspiracy or obstruction of an act the court, in this case the Senate, has already determined you are innocent of and therefore had no involvement. The mystery is how Trump's legal team has been asleep at the wheel in filing any motions to dismiss or petition the Supreme Court directly.
-
Somebody knocks on your front door. You say, "who is it?" They answer, "its Hillary". Do not open the door under any circumstances!!
-
If woke, or liberals, or progressives, whatever they claim to be, believe you can pick your gender, why can't you pick your race? I've posed that question in a few places but never received a coherent answer. Choosing race seems to be perfectly aligned with their self-identification "rules". Why not eye color, height, and weight? Claim to be 65 years old so you can apply for Medicare. Collect a pension and social security too. Waive 401k withdrawal penalties. If you're, say 19, declare you're 21 so you can drink and vote. This can be fun too, right? Use their insane beliefs to your advantage!
-
But they won't be. As an example, the Clinton campaign funded and manufactured the Russian collusion hoax, fed the false story to the FBI, which then used it as pretext to acquire warrants to snoop on a Presidential campaign. False statements, documents, payments laundered, and conspiracy. They all walked. AG Garland names the Asst AG as special prosecutor for the Hunter Biden "investigation", the same guy that's been stonewalling the investigation for years, made a secret blanket immunity deal, and shut down investigators from other Federal agencies such as the IRS. Special powers to delay it more and hide it better providing assistance to the administration in power. The cops at the FBI are going to arrest themselves and the lawyers at DOJ are going to put themselves on trial? Not a chance.
-
We're getting to the root of a point of contention. Governments also make false statements. And lie and cover up and withhold the truth. And issue propaganda and misonformation when it suits their needs. Given the politicized nature of the environment an independent third party review would restore faith in the process. Assuming they've got nothing to hide. And if such an audit performed under the supervision of the court proves the State of Georgia's contentions so be it. I think our differences can be summed up that you trust the government and I do not.
-
I'm willing to take a closer look from an objective perspective. Many of these charges revolve around the conclusion that statements are "false". Such as these. How is the Georgia DA going to prove they're false statements without opening up the voting record for scrutiny by the defense or some independent auditor? This should be interesting. 1. That 2,506 felons voted illegally in the November 3, 2020, presidential election in Georgia. 2. That 66,248 underage people illegally registered to vote before their seventeenth birthday prior to the November 3, 2020, presidential election in Georgia; 3. That at least 2,423 people voted in the November 3, 2020, presidential election in Georgia who were not listed as registered to vote; 4. That 1,043 people voted in the November 3, 2020, presidential election in Georgia who had illegally registered to vote using a post office box; 5. That 10,315 or more dead people voted in the November 3, 2020, presidential election in Georgia; 6. That Fulton County election workers at State Farm Arena ordered poll watchers and members of the media to leave the tabulation area on the night of November 3, 2020, and continued to operate after ordering everyone to leave;The DA better be damn sure that the case because I'd expect those charges create an opportunity for the defense to submit numerous discovery motions and call rebuttal witnesses.
-
In other news not communicated by the "nothing-to-see-here" corporate media: The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) revealed it's in possession of some 5,400 records that contain email pseudonyms that President Joe Biden used during his tenure as vice president. This was revealed in a letter from the Archives to the Southeastern Legal Foundation (SLF), which last year filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for any documents that referenced three pseudonymous email accounts: robinware456@gmail.com, JRBWare@gmail.com and Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov. βWe have performed a search of our collection for Vice Presidential records related to your [June 9, 2022] request and have identified approximately 5,138 email messages, 25 electronic files and 200 pages of potentially responsive records that must be processed in order to respond to your request,β said the letter from NARA.
-
The nutjobs believe car theft and other crimes such as shoplifting are forms of reparations so therefore are not crimes. Until of course, their car gets stolen or they get robbed and then its an issue! The liberals message is as long as one of us isn't the victim we don't care.