All_Pro_Bills

Seems like it. I think they also have the number of the Bills offense. Its not the entire story and I'm not looking to take Allen off the hook for bad decisions. But I think it all starts with the Jets defense, coaches and players, have no fear or respect for the Bills running game other than Allen's escaping the pocket. If you want to slow down the pass rush and force the defense to bring the safeties out of playing 2 deep you need to have an effective run game. When you need it. I thought that was the idea of signing Harris and Murray. Two bigger backs that play a physical game, break some tackles, and get the tough yards.

This team beats itself through a series of blunders by the players and coaches. Last night once again. As soon as Rodgers went out McDermott should have dropped that base nickel and went 4-3. Everybody knew what was coming, lots of runs. Big chunks plays too. Who was surprised? They wern't going 3 or 4 or 5 wide and throwing the ball downfield. Was he paying attention? After halftime I thought the only way the Bills lose is with turnovers. I expect lots of others thought the same. And Josh delivered right on schedule. And I'm sorry, James Cook is not a feature back. Damien Harris, 1 carry. He should have been getting fed the ball on running plays against a very good front where space and running holes are lacking. Move the chains, shorten the game in the 2nd half. The Jets stayed in hi two safety all night not worried about run support because as usual no commitment to the run when the situation called for it. No Rodgers. Nothing the Bills did looked unexpected. Like they were sitting in on Dorsey's game plan sessions all week. I didn't see anything particularly obvious out of Ken to feel they did anything unique or specific to the Jets. It's the same predictable stuff again with a little better receiver group. Where's the creativity and awareness of Josh's lack of patience and judgement when he's got to play the short game? This dog needs a shorter leash. Is the offensive line any better? We'll see in the next few weeks.

I said the same thing about Tom Brady 15 years ago. It might be a long wait for you here too.

As they see all things through the lens of subjectivity, I expect your question can't be answered until you tell them the race and gender identity of the other person.

That idea is another fantasy which takes something one person said to suggest it applies to a wider audience of people. You guys learned that from Mao and Stalin and Bill Ayers. And logically why would the authoritarians in control want a civil war? Duh.

Good question. A 2023 liberal is a person that supports an intrusive and authoritarian big central government, which they control, imposing its will on the public in every aspect of life as there can be no separation between public and private life. Now it's certain any 2023 self-identified liberal will disagree. That's to be expected. They perceive themselves to be champions of "democracy" fighting those evil people seeking to impose a dictatorship. The comical thing is they have no problem using the tactics and methods of a dictator to stop them. The idea being impose an authoritarian one-party dictatorship to stop others from imposing an authoritarian one-party dictatorship. A beat them to the punch approach. That last part is the irony.

I think the root of the problem is the outrageously high tuition charged by these universities and colleges. Like $40K and higher. Some sitting on billion dollar endowment funds while soaking parents and students. Acedemic institutions running a country club for intellectuals living the comfortable life pillaging the system and comsuming high level of resources while producing little of value. A permanent vacation. No wonder they support socialism. They're already living it. A cost/benefit of that colege degree weighing in with interest and expected income might show it a poor investment. In terms of fairness, it's not right to require somebody to start their work life in a financial bottomless pit. I'm not against these student debt relief efforts but there should be some means test and the colleges should bear, lets say 1/2 the costs, not just the taxpayers.

This Musk story, which isn't much of a story when examined, follows the standard process of how the establishment attacks anyone that defies or threatens their interests. It's all dependent on how many rote "thinkers" they get engaged to support it all. The common thread is they all start with a lie that is transformed to truth by designed repetition. Everyone should understand by now that anyone that defies the official narrative is helping <insert bad guy name here> by refusing to go along with one lunacy or another. But choose a side, our side, the good guys or the bad guys. There's no other option. Love it or leave it. My country right or wrong. You get the idea. You're absolutely discouraged from engaging in logical or reasoned thinking that might cause you to draw your own conclusions outside of those being generated by various think tanks, for profit entities and their supporters, or various government actors, and the standard cast of mainstream and social media grifters that always back up the story. For gigles add in the usual characters here on PPP that are ready and willing to pile on and when the bell rings as they all bark right on queue.

In the brief, Willis summarily dismissed the comparison between the action of the Georgia defendants and “actions that did not result in prosecution 60 years ago in a different jurisdiction with different election code and criminal statutes, presided over by different prosecuting agencies, and with differing substantive evidence of criminal intent.” And most important and obvious but left unsaid.. that she's out to get Trump. Please excuse me if we're still playing that "rule of law" game of peek-a-boo.

And yet its costing Federal, State, and local governments billions and billions to support the influx of "asylum seekers". Its magic!

Unless you buy into the idea that in his elder years Joe Biden has suddenly transformed into a radical progressive championing social justice issues and causes, how can you believe this administrations priorities and political agenda align with anything Biden has supported and advocated for his entire political life.

You are a walking, talking, talking point personified. Always on script and on story. Bravo. Anyway, you asked a question and I gave you answer. What more do you expect?

How long before Biden gets dumped and we find out that Obama has been running a WFH operation while relaying instructions and directives to the ventriloquist dummy in the Oval Office?

The imbeciles welded the doors open so try and figure it out from there.

Musk said, "NEVER turned Starlink on in those controversial border zones - for exactly this reason, as he feared using this technology near borders could prompt an escalation in the war". Nobody turned off anything because it was never turned on. The story is another liberal hoax targeting somebody that refuses to do their bidding. With the standard coordinated and choreographed fake outrage in unison group of a-holes working 24/7 to convince people their lie is truth. Now that the truth is out let's change the story and tell me, but, but, but, he should have had it turned on from the beginning anyway because no private citizen has the right to decide for themselves whether or not they should become involved in somebody else's conflict.

I think this is reality. Its most likely at this point that Russia is going to prevail absent any direct military involvement by US or NATO forces. Zelensky is not going to get back Crimea or the Eastern provinces. Heck, there are provinces in Ukraine with majority ethnic Polish and Hungarian populations that might choose to become part of those countries when all is said and done. This war of attrition has cost Ukraine most of their effective fighting forces along with seeing foreign mercenaries fighting on their side exit the confrontation at this point. News that recruiting standards have been lowered to conscript less qualified men into the Army as the populations of men in good fighting condition dwindles is a clear sign of stress. Soldiers are being sent to the front without any training, some kidnapped by security forces off the streets. Many that get sent to the front are killed in action immediately. Those trained on US and other NATO country weapons systems have been instructed how to operate the weapons and systems but not how to apply them successfully in combat. The Spring offensive has been a failure. Meanwhile, Russia has built up a sufficient fighting force that is sizeable enough to prevail in any war of attrition along with building up their domestic munitions industries. Their performance has been far from perfect with consistently bad leadership but the math doesn't lie. Nobody here is rooting for Putin as that ridiculous charge gets thrown out there any time some other posters want to invalidate another's opinion that deviates from the official view. We can wish all we want for Ukraine to prevail but reality needs to be the place where smart and fact-based decisions are made. Again, if the US and NATO are not willing to engage in direct combat operations this conflict is lost. If they are then there are other risks and issues to consider.

Now let's see Joe's Afghanistan video!

That's got nothing to do with Starlink. But when an opportunity to throw in your Trump memes presents itself then why waste it? Musk is not supporting Trump. Or another other candidate. Musk is working to support free speech on social media and fighting to expose and end government/corporate cooperative efforts to censor opposing views. Lefties still have a hard on for Putin because they're still deluded and brainwashed to believe he "stole" the election from their beloved Hillary.

Apparently people that don't see the need to follow any rules or perhaps have no comprehension of contractual relationships have difficulty understanding that actual agreed to terms and conditions govern an arrangement and if and when one side violates the agreement the agreement is in non-compliance.

NYC doesn't want any more guests and the Fed's idea to dump them off in NJ, mostly in Atlantic City, has been nixed by the governor. The solution would be close the border to more immigrants until this can be sorted out but they'll never do that when there's a good crisis that can be exploited.

Even if it were true? That's an even bigger story than the trespassing rap!

Starlink was not provided with the intent to support military operations. That's pretty much the entire story.

How about they did nothing to preempt it, left the standard Capitol Police contingent swinging in the breeze to deal with 100K protesters, and let it happen while the National Guard was held back a couple blocks away until 8 PM when it was all over in order to exploit it for political purposes? How about those people? Not a one of them responsible for allowing the Capitol to be undefended has been questioned or held to account. But Joe Public taking selfies in the Rotunda gets a year for trespassing.

I'm not going to defend anybody that committed acts of violence but I'm also not going to get on my knees and blow the government for the outstanding job (sarcasm) their doing either like some here.

Asking you to share actual facts and sources to support your claim about something is an inability to discuss fact?