All_Pro_Bills

The problem with making decisions based on climate models is the limited duration of the data sets. The Earth has been going through cycles of warming and cooling for hundreds of millions of years and we're making big policy decisions based on a partial set of data observations of maybe 150 years. Along with this past models have been terrible at predicting the future. You have zero accurate temperature readings from previous time. Only subjective understanding of warmer or colder. Pronouncements that we have 12 years until the end of humanity embellish the urgency. Yesterday, climate activists were demonstrating at the UN demanding an end to the use of oil. What's comical is they were mostly dressed in windbreakers and rain gear composed of materials derived from petrochemicals. I don't think these people have an comprehension of what the world they're demanding would look like and the implications of switching to more expensive, less efficient, and less reliable sources of electricity generation and the elimination of certain materials which I assume will be replaced by something to be identified.

I think people are making a lot of assumptions about what they believe and what a jury might believe given counter arguments from a defense counsel vs. a grand jury indictment where the prosecutor will tell the GJ the minimum necessary information to acquire an indictment on the charges they've submitted. Such as the bolded hypothetical below. A prosecutor might argue that I'm complicit but convincing a jury when confronted by a defense argument might not so easy. Given I had no knowledge of your actions and wasn't present when the hack occurred. Not to mention it wasn't part of "the plan". The other part is the unconstitutionality of it all. You might have a better understanding of the details around the charges than I do but I don't recall any of the charges indicating any specific article or amendment to the Constitution was violated in the indictments. One thing for sure, any convictions will be appealed. Perhaps all the way to the Supreme Court. Also not sure any of this is hurting Trump, or maybe helping Biden is a more appropriate way of looking at it. CBS news poll has Trump over Biden right now 50/49. Which seems incredible. https://www.scribd.com/document/671717605/cbsnews-20230917-SUN#

It does require action. Does this furtherance meet the criteria for action? That's the question. If you and I decide to rob a bank, write down a 5 step plan, discuss the plan, drive by the bank to check it out, and then decide not to do it, then the cops find out we discussed a plan to rob the bank do you think they're going arrest us and a prosecutor would acquire an indictment and attempt to try and convict us of conspiracy to rob the bank?

But it wasn't executed. You can say it was a "conspiracy" but rarely is conspiracy a standalone charge absent some actionable offense.

Biden won't side with Putin but he'll do his best imitation like his Philadelphia "MAGA extremist" speech in Philly. A fool and a tool.

I have a copy of that "plan". It's like the one the Coyote has used to try catching the Roadrunner. There was no "plan".

The concerning thing is the US national debt rose by $1 trillion in just 3 months. Whether its an accelerating trend or a one-time blip isn't clear.

Staggering, vomiting, belligerent drunks can really ruin the game day experience. Especially if you're introducing younger fans to the live-game experience.

The party of chaos reins! I saw no-bail rules are going into affect. Citizens need to make a choice. Leave, or fight, or die, and most certainly stop voting for these scum representing a political party at war against its supporters. Stop being a supporter.

Romney doesn't like the populist movement and prefers the traditional Republican role of representing the interests of white businessmen. Assuring the party of like-minded conservatives will politely assume a minority position in perpetuity to an opposition thst feels no need to play by the rules. Assuming the part of the Washington Generals for the Globetrotter Democrats. Me, I used to vote for liberal democrats before they moved so far left on social and economic positions that in a relative comparison they make traditional moderates look like radical right wing extremists.

Turns out Barisma was corrupt. They paid the Biden's $5M to get the prosecutor off their backs. But still no evidence.

Two Fettermans's? Sounds like a great plot for the beginning of latest zombie movie series. The original Fetterman escapes from a secret bio weapons lab and attacks an unsuspecting person in the town. That person then transforms into another exact replica of Fetterman. Soon there are thousands of Fetterman's running for the Senate and the entire country is thrown into anarchy! A secondary plot twist revealed near the end is another type of imbecile zombie has arisen. A brain-dead Fetterman voter that infects the majority of the population of Pennsylvania and then other surrounding States.

To settle the debate, I believe a solution would be to put both to a series of mental acuity and psychological tests conducted by an independent party and then providing the unfiltered results to the public. Which party do you think would be most hesitant to that idea?

So-called MAGA people haven't changed their ideology or views for decades. They're just getting in the way of the left FUBAR'ing whatever they haven't screwed up already. Meanwhile, the extremists on the left have moved even further left and incorrectly conclude the distance between the two views is proof of right wing extremism while in reality its they who are the extremists.

This is a dumb idea. I've "hosted" lots of family members in the past that needed some help and it doesn't ever end well. Generally because they never want to leave. It's a lot easier living for free and eliminating the everyday stress of having to pay lots of living expenses when you can spend most of your time relaxing. When I ask them when they're getting off their ass to hold up their end of our agreed to arrangement they get an attitude and I'm the bad guy. The one letting them live for free. The lesson is your generousity will likely be taken advantage of by most.

Tough probes? It's a transparent attempt to distract and whitewash the more serious offenses. And pull a fast one with an immunity deal for anything beyond the gun charge which will result in no time served and a nominal fine. Count on it. More BS from crooked Garland.

Look and learn, use big, physical RB. TD.

Somewhere Leslie Frazier is smiling asking do you still think it was me?

NY Post story quoting European Commission report. I should point out anyone could find this Post article and search for the EC's report if they actually wanted to find it https://nypost.com/2023/09/08/despite-bidens-claim-europeans-werent-trying-to-oust-ukraine-prosecutor-targeting-hunters-firm/

If I recall I maybe created 2 or 3 posts on the topic. And if memory serves me, I did not raise a defense but questioned what exactly Thomas might have provided in exchange for anything? A valid question still without an answer. There were no cases impacting anyone mentioned in front of the court where an opinion or vote would have benefited. Biden on the other hand got a prosecutor who was praised in Europe and elsewhere for investigating corruption that employed his son and provided payments to his family fired. He admitted on film with soundtrack to unilateral policy decisions and extorting the government in Ukraine to play ball and fire the guy or a billion in aid gets held up. Burisa owners under scrutiny found the payoffs well worth it. I think so far that's the difference. That and US government agencies and officials obstructing and assisting the Biden's. We'll soon hear more.

What's more troubling than federal law enforcement creating "terrorist" plots and then framing the participants is how many are comfortable and supportive of the practice. These are the same people crying about how much they love "democracy". I have serious doubts about their sincerity.

You should stick to cheerleadng for more military spending.

Well then that settles everything.

“If a politician does a ‘favor’ for a crime boss, and the crime boss pays the politician’s wife, it’s still bribery. If the crime boss pays the politician’s crackhead son on account of the favor, it’s still bribery.” In short, the favor was done and exactly who gets the money is irrelevant. From what I've seen lately, such as a Washington Post op-ed from an established CIA messenger boy at the paper saying Joe shouldn't run in 2024 to a suddenly green lighted MSM asking Fox News like tough and probing questions about Biden's statement's and actions signals the permanent un-elected government of the United States has decided the benefits of carrying on with the fake President's administration is exceeded by the potential liability and exposure they may be subjected to by these inquiries. Don't think for a second the CIA, NSA, FBI, DOJ, and lots of other 3 letter agencies and bureau's are oblivious to the extortion and influence caper the Biden's have been running. A Bee doesn't land on a flower in Mongolia without the CIA and NSA knowing about it. DOJ and FBI have spent the better part of 3 years working to make the story go away, burying evidence, obstructing investigations, and spreading disinformation. But its not going away. Its moving closer to exposing the truth to the public, many which are totally clueless as to what went on. And lots of people enabling and supporting the operation from the shadows wish to remain in the shadows. Soon Joe will officially announce he's dropping out of the 2024 race for one reason or another or we'll all wake up one morning stunned to here the poor chap passed away quietly in his sleep during the night. Was it Chuck Schummer that said the intelligence community has six ways to Sunday of getting you. Well, that's one way.

Sorry to burst your bubble but the Biden administration has beat them to it.