All_Pro_Bills

So the idea was 20K Haitian's are going to revitalize the community and the economy? Who's the sponsor of that idea? Here in NJ the town just north of where I live officials are operating under the same theory that you can send thousands of unskilled people devoid of any understanding of American culture to a chronically economically depressed place and magically transform the place by flooding it with more residents. I'm hard pressed to see or find any quantifiable signs of improvement based on an influx of people there. I think those believing in the idea are driven by wishful thinking.

But you and the Kamala fanboys here are all completely objective without any bias? Is that what you think?

Ukraine was independent until Victoria Nuland and her State Department staff and the CIA engineered a coup in 2014 that removed the elected President and installed a government hand picked by Washington. Slightly better than the drooling vegetable and the cackling douche bag.

And Mayorkis criticized Texas border enforcement efforts that have slowed illegal crossings to a trickle.

This is an argument of the pot calling the kettle black. How many soveriegn nations has Washington attacked directly or through proxy in say, the past 25 years?

I have nothing to say about Laura but these conspiracies and ther proponents would not exist if the government would be transparent and honest with Americans by releasing all the facts and conclusions gathered during their official investigation. As is customary, they always leave us with an incomplete story typically justified by vague and undefined national security concerns. Avoiding transparency at any cost. The lack of candor leaves a lot of room for speculation and there are plenty of conspiracy peddlers that are happy to fill in the blanks. The government simply prefers this to telling the truth.

I believe Starr is Billstime's evil twin.

Wishful thinking and slogans are not a plan.

So Harris has no plan.

And when they lose militarily? What?

For the sake of argument let's say that is Trump's plan. Now that that's out of the way, what's the Biden or Haris plan for a negotiated peaceful settlement of the conflict? Is there any plan or any intelligent ideas? More importantly something reflecting the realities of the situation?

None of those things you've mentioned are things democrats have supported during this administration's term.

So more big government spending programs that will make everything more expensive and produce more inflation. And Medicare coverage, not so great. Pays 80% of covered charges.

Well, it sure is free for everybody else when the U.S. taxpayer gets to pay the bill.

So two great big defense contractor taxpayer funded welfare bottomless money pits.

It's all quite logical. It can't be because of Harris' positions on issues or the details around them because who knows what those are exactly. I'd invite you to provide us some detail around those if you could. Rather, she works in an industry that is dominated by the far left where endorsing Trump and breaking from the herd would result in her being exiled from most or all social circles, media appearances, public & private events, and awards. Simply, while Swift has already earned a bundle and has a high net worth, her future income stream would be threatened. Once again, the theme of pure self-interest rears its head.

Harris fared well but it's 100% certain she's going to do exactly what the DNC machine tells her to do and the belief she's going to set policy and the agenda for the administration is an illusion like it was with Biden. Trump failed to get that message across that she can claim any position she'd like to, put on a good show, and get passing grades for the debate but none of it matters. Because if she wins just like Biden, she'll do exactly what the radical left says and is just a puppet and answering all the softball questions from the mods won't change that truth. Missed opportunity to embarrass her and the moderators and get that message to the voters at the same time.

The media bias is clear. Its one major takeaway from the event. They covered for Biden's mental condition when it was obvious something was erong nd now they're covering for Harris. Many objective people are asking the same question that you ask. If the press can't be neutral with these debates then they should be limited to setting topics. Just let the two candidates fight it out like we do in real life. I think Harris did well but I have to deduct points for degree of difficulty because she was babies by the mods. Just as expected

Truthfully, we don't need a new border bill. Just enforce the rules and criteria for asylum status. Almost all of the people coming across are seeking economic relief. That doesn’t qualify you for asylum. Criminals don't qualify. They should be deported right now. But they're not. Rather most get released to repeat more crimes. The problems we have won"t be solved by more laws because the problem is this administration won't enforce the current laws and claims they would suddenly enforce new laws if only Republicans would go along are without merit or evidence. Stop pretending otherwise. Dispute that if you wish.

I didn't watch the entire show because i can't stand the format and the questions. Its more like a joint press conference than a one-on-one debate between two people. Which is what we need to see. But of what i did see i thought Harris was composed and performed well and Trump came off a little agitated and rambling in some responses. Sure the mods favored Harris but that was a given. One thing i did see was Muir ask Trump for is details of his deportation proposal and rather than doing what I would have done, he proceeded into a lengthy and unorganized response. i would have simply said the following. About 15 million people crossed our border claiming asylum. The rules and criteria are clear. What's also clear is Harris has no intention of enforcing the rules. Allowing and sending all these people into communities across the country without keeping track of most. Everyone gets a hearing. If their claim is valid they can stay but if it isn't they can't stay. If they don't show up for the hearing they can't stay. My administration will follow the rules and enforce existing rules and law. A Harris administration won't. Just an example of how he responded and seemed unprepared to give sharp and focused responses.

I'm objective enough to say Trump has his flaws in character and behavior. And his policy ideas aren't perfect. But they're way less damaging than what Biden has done and what Harris will continue and most likely amplify. Can any posters supporting Harris say anything negative about her? I haven't seen it yet. So walk the talk dude.

You really do have a blind spot when it comes to establishment politicians of both parties. At some point you're going to realize your faith is misplaced.

You do that. And while you're at it keep trusting and believing in all the hacks driving our country to an eventual economic and social disaster while they line their pockets with your tax dollars.

The Inflation Reduction Act funds hard at work rebuilding America. Don't be surprised when it breaks the Biden administration is making direct payments to Mexican cartels to bring people to the US and Washington politicians are getting a cut of the drug trade profits. Our system is utterly corrupt and beyond repair.

"A danger to national security". They need to be more specific to be taken seriously. And the fact that they don't cite the most obvious "threat to national security", an open southern border automatically disqualifies their opinion. Like the Chaney's and others these people are scared they're going to lose power, influence, and $$$$$ and their views are simply pure self-interest.