All_Pro_Bills

Trump did not say he wanted to cancel the Constitution. And just what personal interest could I possibly have in wanting the Constitution to be cancelled? When you see an opinion piece in the Times from a conservative scholar advocating major changes, or elimination, of the Constitution let me know. Until then the only people articulating for that are liberal scholars, nut jobs from Harvard law and other places. You guys make up all this fear porn but cannot articulate a few sentences detailing how anyone is going to pull that off. I know you're not an idiot so I conclude you're just saying this crap to support your team. Your cult finds the constitution an obstacle because it hinders the agenda to destroy our common culture and society. Right now that job is about 75% complete. I hope you're happy. No he said dictator for "one day" to undo all of Joe's executive orders. Get it right.

The only people I hear making waves about cancelling the Constitution are liberal scholars claiming its obsolete and holding back liberal policy objectives. The 1st and 2nd amendments, Article 3 blocking their chaos. The New York Times ran an op-ed from one of these liberal imbeciles recently. Titled, The Constitution Is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous? One of the biggest threats to America’s politics might be the country’s founding document. So what's the real threat to democracy. Far-left liberals. Stop making up stories to divert attention from the actual threat.

Not sure what it means but after watching Tim's performance and Kamala's new fake persona splash across the media spectrum I've come to the conclusion that liberals and progressives are members of a major suicide cult. Because it can't be any more obvious this clown-duo will destroy what remains of social, legal, and economic order in the country. Either their goal is complete chaos or they're just plain stupid.

I think Vance was chosen to be the successor to lead the populist movement when Trump leaves the spotlight. if Harris wins expect economic and social conditions to rapidly deteriorate. If she wins watch for gold prices to explode $100's higher as inflation expectations take off. By the end of her term the US dollar will be close to worthless. And war most likely. Will I be right? Nothing's a certainty but that's how I'm going to play it. A future unencumbered by the past indeed.

Who knows here, but typically the taxpayers are paying, either directly through a government agency or through some NGO funded by government agency grants via, you guessed it, the taxpayers. Or like in NYC, funds are diverted from other programs to fund sanctuary city legislated support. Sorry, no more computers for poor kids or homeless shelters for the homeless. The new folks take priority. That's your standard liberal government at work looking out for you and your best interests, ha, ha. You could file a Freedom Of Information request to the government but at the Federal level the most transparent administration in history likes to run these programs through NGO's to avoid disclosure laws applicable to government agencies. And those NGO's have no such public disclosure requirements. Very convenient for anyone not wanted anyone to know what they're up to here. But why so secret? Looking forward to more of a future unencumbered by the past!

And the professional grade Hollywood type marketing campaign complete with scripted and rehearsed appearances and focus group tested positions and policies that is manufacturing the image of a new and improved Kamala Harris is more or less, what? The equivalent 100x more intense. She's a complete phony, fake, illusion, take your pick.

TDS rule 1: Trump can never be right. If Trump told the Libs shooting themselves in the head was a bad idea they'd kill themselves just to prove him wrong.

Their campaign strategy is in a word unique. They keep hammering away at Trump's record but he's not the President. They skip over and ignore the fact that Biden has been President for 3 1/2 years, the shelf life of blaming the last guy has expired, and the Biden/Harris administration owns whatever problems exist now. Basically, they're attempting to run against the record of their own administration by saying we can do so much better. But if they win, it will be more of the policies and agenda of Biden's term.

I'm more than happy to acknowledge your version of the events of that day as soon as the government steps up and comes clean about how many Federal agents, assets, and informants were in the crowd, and truthfully tells the American people what role they played in turning the protest into a violent event. We know they were involved and we know they're withholding the truth. Sadly, you and many others are happy with just knowing 1/2 the story because it suits your favorite narratives.

Good question. Some of it is a show of force to discourage Iran from taking action. And tactical support for operations. But it's not a good look to act as a mediator in trying to bring the parties together to negotiate a settlement while clearly taking one side over the other when things heat up.

Don't let them foool you. It's all about maintaining "order," in the Middle East to keep the oil supply flowing at reasonable prices. Its all just business. This continued strategy communicates the government analysts conclude oil and gas are going to be around for much longer than the renewable story being peddled to the public. Otherwise, we'd just get out of this snakepit. Just watch what happens if Iran tries to close the Straits of Hormuz. The US Navy will arrive with guns blazzin.

Nobody that's clearly winning any conflict or fight has any incentive or reason to negotiate. The solution here is obvious. Hamas and Hezbollah should surrender. Because @Joe Ferguson forever brought it up. Ask him that question.

About $200B (US & Europe) has been poured into Ukraine which is something like 4 times bigger than Russia's entire annual military budget. It would appear money spent and weapons supplied are not an issue. Lack of execution, availability of well-trained soldiers are the main problems.

Simply "America First" does not equate to "America Alone".

Waltz and his ranting remind me of my buddies fat and out of shape alcoholic dad when we were kids. A real douche.

Maybe because it was a lousy deal with $60B for Ukraine, about $10B for Israel, money to process people thru the border faster, and a few pennies for security. Why don't they just shut the gates Biden ordered open and stop going to court to block security measures instituted by the States?

That was a mistake. But electricity and natural gas and other fossil fuels are not 100% interchangeable sources of energy for things like industrial use and home heating applications. Their mistake was not saying boo when NordStream2 was blown up. It was an act of terrorism and war against Germany. And it wasn't some Ukrainian diving team working off a yacht ill-equipped to handle such a dive that carried out that operation. It decimated industry dependent on low cost gas that has been replaced by 3-4x more costly LNG. The reality is Germany operates as a vassal state to Washington, as does most of Europe. American's think they're our allies, they're our servants.

Germany's mistake is putting the objectives of US policy ahead of the needs of German economy and its people.

You touch on the issue I have with the climate change debate. My concern isn't whether or not climate change is man-made or some cyclical functioning of the Earth's climate. My focus is on the chosen solution. Oil and gas are high density, highly efficient, more reliable, and lower cost energy sources than the renewables such as solar and wind. And EV's have issues with cost, charging times, and range. Add in the carbon produced through the process of mining and manufacturing parts for the vehicles and you get next to no carbon reduction. Its a game of out of sight our of mind. Maybe these things work out over time with technological improvements. My assessment is you can't run civilization at the current scale and living standards with these alternatives and the experience in Germany supports that conclusion. Its just one example. If you want to go renewable than you should accept that you're living standards supported by energy consumption, are going to have to downsize.

They say diversity I say its their version of colonialism where the traditional European based American culture is replaced by a 3rd world downgrade in living standards and norms. This is not progress unless you long for the lifestyle of cavemen.

Waltz will do what Democrats do. Push income redistribution schemes to buy votes of people that pay no taxes while saying the wealthy need to pay their fair share then blame rich white people for all our problems while taking millions in campaign donations from rich white people. Oh the games they play and the liberal suckers won't question the contradiction of it all.

I don't know what you're observing in your area but there's not a lot of farming going on in midtown Manhattan migrant shelters and hotels where people are just hanging around collecting public assistance checks and free housing while complaining the food menu doesn't include enough "healthy choices" or "cultural alternatives". And remember... The majority came across the border claiming asylum status. That was the loophole in the system the NGO's and human traffickers with a big assist from the Biden administration have exploited to flood the country with immigrants. If they in reality came here for economic reasons and to "work" then they arrived under false pretense.

They just play bigger. When I watch the Jets D they more often than not correctly read and react much quicker and they arrive at the ball carrier or receiver with a lot of intensity.

Look around the league and check out how much bigger and stronger linebackers are on most defenses. I was watching some of the Jets/Broncos game and while it was a snooze fest for most of the game their defenses are so much bigger, faster, stronger, and at the point of attack than the Bills defenders. The Bills LB's are more physically suited for safety. Add in playing the nickel and bringing in a smaller DB. The Bills will always struggle with offenses with good physical running games. The way they've won these games has been to get out to a lead and force them out of their game plan to run the ball. That strategy was over on the Ravens first offensive play. The Bills will make the playoffs as long as Allen stays healthy but I'm not fooling myself into believing they're going to beat the Chiefs in the playoffs until they get more size and speed into the front 7.

What we have now by importing all these unskilled masses is lower wages for Americans and higher unemployment among the poorest. Because employers are taking advantage of the situation and hiring immigrants that will work cheap at the expense of Americans. Undercutting a living wage. Aren't your leaders touting a living wage for American workers and decrying the exploitation of workers by evil conservative business owners and price gougers? Yet their policies produce the exact opposite result to depress wage levels and lead to higher unemployment among citizens because of a system that puts downward pressure on wages. And bigger profits for businesses. You're cult needs to get their story straight. Do you want to import millions of unskilled immigrants or guarantee Americans a living wage? You can't have both at such high volumes of border crossings. And sure we need immigration. But not uncontrolled and unskilled masses dependent on social assistance for years. My neighbors are Asian immigrants. As are many in my neighborhood. But they're highly skilled, productive, well compensated by private employers, and educated professionals with advanced degrees in areas like medicine and technology. They add to our economy and don't rely on taxpayer money to support their families. This is the kind of immigration we need more of to make our country great. Not millions more dependent on assistance from the taxpayers. High skilled and highly educated immigrants, yes. 10's of millions of unskiled to depress wages of the poorest among us, no.