All_Pro_Bills

I understand the nut left some sort of Manifesto. Initially, officials insisted it would not be released to the public. If he supported Trump or his specific positions I'll conclude the liberal democratic government of the State of Minnesota would release the Manifesto. Who knows this may change?

Excluding a small number of bad actors, 1600 mostly misdemeanor trespassing charges even though the doors were opened from the inside and security invited them in and when asked to leave they did. Realistically the government or members of congress were never under any real threat. It was allowed to play out for theatrical value. If this was an insurrection then the bar is set really low for that kind of classification. As the facts and evidence hidden by that Kangaroo committee are exposed over the course of time this fairy tale story will go poof. This I am certain of. In the meantime enjoy believing another whopper of a lie.

No Kings attending wealthy white boomers are just self-serving here concerned that if illegals are deported they'll have to clean their own houses and cut their own lawns. Or be forced to pay much more for services without anyone they can exploit.

The video evidence supports the tourist view for the protesters except for a handful of bad actors. We've all acknowledge J6 rioters deserved to be arrested. Something I'd like to see you acknowledge with the current riots. What the anarchists think they're going to accomplish is a mystery. It's a losing position on a losing issue. Protecting illegsl immigrant rapists, murderers, drug dealers, sex traffickers and others from justice.. Why not extend the courtesy to the domestic creeps too? All funded by shady NGO dark money much of it from China. How is life as one of Xi's useful idiots?

Which only proves the CCP is programming Google search algorithms and logic!

It would certainly put liberal claims they're committed to democracy and the peaceful expression of all political and social views to the test. My guess is the crowds will mostly be white middle aged liberal cat ladies. They constitute the core of the political left. They are emotionally unstable and prone to erratic behavior. So keep your head up.

Get the plate number and call the cops and tell them the occupants where shouting insults and waving pistols out the windows.

Trump is a 1st class BS artist. Just listening to his rhetoric I conclude he doesn't have a complete understanding of the facts and figures. But the democrats are suffering from some mental defect. They equate anarchy to democracy and look at anyone working to maintain a civil society as an authoritarian. They act like spoiled children with parents that spent a life not disiplining their child. What it comes down to for me is I dislike Trump less than I dislike the liberal left.

What evidence do you cite to conclude the election was stolen?

A major malfunction in the liberal mind is they believe actions necessary to maintain a civil social order, like arresting criminal illegal aliens, are the equivalent to and consistent with acts of authoritarianism. They are not. And that anarchy is the equivalent of freedom. This is also a false equivalent.

You're never going to please everybody and that's been the nature of the process for as long as I've been alive. And before that and after I'm dead. So quit complaining like the practice of providing special interests perks and favors was suddenly invented and inserted into legislation starting in 2025.

Based on their actions the Democrats believe illegal immigrant sex offenders, murderers, rapists, human traffickers, drug dealers, and gang members are above the law because their actions are inhibiting Federal law enforcement from apprehending them and proceeding with deportation. And these riots are simply bad optics. Do they really believe this is a winning strategy for 2026 and beyond? Think about how utterly irrational their position is here. Do they really expect to gain any political capital or support outside of the fringe left that is already in the fold? A sensible approach would be to concede these "bad actors" need to be apprehended and removed then proceed with adopting a common sense position on the migrant issue that will move the debate towards the political middle where a compromise can be achieved.

If Iran is intent on getting nuclear weapons why can't they buy them from say, North Korea or move their research operation to that country? Out of the reach of Israel forces. They're already aligned in the Axis of Evil. What do you think the response options would be to that move? Hypothetically speaking evaluate that option and hypothetical responses please.

Instigating staged confrontations to claim your opponents are authoritarians is Marxism 101.

First off, I've got to agree with you that U.S. Customs is a much bigger hassle than Canada Customs. Although its been several years, my experience has been pretty consistent when crossing the border into Canada. A couple basic questions and come on in. On the U.S. sides coming back its hit and miss. You might sail through, you might not. The only problem I ever had in Canada was getting grilled by two Cops in Toronto when I was in my 20's. I wasn't doing anything. Maybe they thought I looked "suspicious" or something? As for American freedom being trampled by the current administration I'm not clear exactly what freedoms, or the freedom to do what is being threatened. As for threatening democracy, let's not overlook the fact it was the Democrats and their media co-conspirators that flew cover to protect a mentally compromised President while aides and unknown persons made Presidential decisions outside of the Constitutional and legal framework of the Executive branches powers. A coup by another name. That's seems pretty undemocratic. Un-elected unknowns making non-delegateable decisions substituting for the elected President on decisions reserved for the President. The proper procedural action should have been to invoke the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, remove the President, and elevate VP Harris to the Presidency. Instead they played games in the shadows. As for these street riots in L.A., there's no Constitutional rights or freedoms being threatened because there are no protections in place to destroy property, attack public and private citizens and law enforcement, start stuff on fire, attack Federal facilities, and loot stores. Crime is illegal but Democrats seem okay with their modern day Brownshirts in the streets of American cities. None of this can be remotely classified or described as "peaceful protest". On top of this, they make all kinds of excuses and frankly irrational arguments to provide exemptions to the "rule of law" to foreigners coming into the country illegally. As celebrities and others express outrage in various media at ICE arresting illegals and taking them off the streets and protesters moan and groan about authoritarians they were asked a simple question. These people we're arresting are pedophiles, murderers, rapists, drug dealers, gang member, and human traffickers and other bad actors. Which of these people of outstanding character do you want us to let go back into these communities? Is the irony of the Democrats insane and preposterous positions on illegals lost on anyone else by the fact that one of the groups most supportive of these enforcement against against illegals is immigrants that came to America legally?

What we want is a civilized and free society and those animals in the street in L.A. are not civilized. And they're infringing on the rights and freedoms of others by breaking the law. So how would you handle it? Let them burn down and loot all the properties and businesses they'd like? That seems to be the strategy of the Governor and Mayor. Riot and break into Federal facilities and free criminal illegals? Attack and injury immigration enforcement personnel carrying out their duties? I'm not saying Trump is handling the problem with perfections but polling suggests most Americans want this crap stopped. So what do you think? Do you agree that people that circumvent customs and border checkpoints or lie to customs officials are breaking the law? That people with violent criminal records should not be let into the country? And identifying them and deporting them is in compliance with the law? Would you support the idea to eliminate the border and customs checks between places like Niagara Falls Ontario and New York and just let people pass freely back and forth? I'm just throwing it out there.

The riots should tell us that the party has concluded all their legal actions and court ordered injunctions are going to have minimal impact in slowing down and impeding the administration's efforts to reverse the flow of illegals that was allowed under Biden. The riots are an act of desperation, not unity. The objective is, and before public opinion swings more heavily against the rioters, to instigate a crisis where protesters are killed by law enforcement or the military. To create the "told you so" moment when they can say see Trump is a dictator.

NGOs, Marxist groups, foreign enemies of America.

Tariffs are one form of government interference in the market between buyers and sellers. And if you feel this way about tariffs I assume you don't support blue state liberals that demand everyone makes a "living wage" and legislate to raise wages higher which increase the costs to businesses which results in businesses raising prices on consumers. In either case you're going to pay more. Both tariffs and minimum wage laws interfere with the market. Both increase costs to consumers but the majority of Trump haters are generally okay with minimum wage laws. A big part of the reason a Big Mac Meal is $10.19.

A prerequisite to that is how the global dollar reserve and trade settlement system works. Those arrangements enable huge annual deficits and U.S. government spending without the impacting inflation all that money creation would have on any other nation. As for how the government funds the deficits its pretty simple. They issue treasury paper which is generally purchased by foreign central banks with excess dollars acquired from trade surpluses with the U.S. That's what makes much of Trump's tariff fight unproductive. If we don't run a trade deficit where are all these foreigners going to get the dollars to purchase treasuries to fund the deficit?

I've said it a few times. If these NGOs and wealthy tech moguls are funding violent groups committing acts of violence then thoroughly investigate them, build a case, file charges, then freeze and seize their assets under RICO. Arresting professional street thugs isn't going to have as much impact as cutting off the head of the Snake. Otherwise, they're free to peacefully protest all that want.

The unfortunate thing is the guard would be completely unnecessary if Newsom and Bass would allow local and state law enforcement to cooperate with immigration. Repeal sanctuary laws. But they won't. Instead they support rioters. Trump has learned the lesson from the 2020 BLM riots. He's not going to dick around with these twerps this time. If they want to play hardball, hardball it is.

He has some good points. And while protests are fine there's still no excuse for the riots. And if Jim believes as he says that lawbreakers should be dealt with through the legal system, then Democratic leadership should publicly encourage Newsom and Bass to fully cooperate with immigration officers. And Obama didn't have to deal with uncooperative democratic governors and mayors throwing up roadblocks through sanctuary policies. No, Newsom and Bass and the riot organizers want to play hardball. So hardball it is..

Governor Newsom is saying is "For the last 4 years of open borders everything was hearts and flowers in L.A. That is, until recently when the Feds decided start enforcing the law. Its should be clear that people that break the law would be unhappy with efforts to enforce it. The administration is intentionally enforcing the law to elicit a violent response from the law breakers. And we had everything under control until the President decided to enforce the law. It is very irresponsible of him."

That's an interesting perspective. Others might think its simply people receiving the consequences of their actions which viewed objectively is a lot of bad behavior. Things like looting stores or starting cars on fire. Do you understand the concept of consequences?