All_Pro_Bills

Lying can get confusing when attempting to keep the story straight. One thing is clear, the Dems are pulling out all the stops. But only their faithful fools are biting on the hook here.

My take on suburbanization is that it was enabled by the advent of the automobile and is one of the greatest waste of resources, materials, energy, land, and water in the history of the human race. But the ability to spread out in low density subdivisions and have some space and privacy between you and your neighbors was the compelling reason for the migration. Urbanizing suburbia is counter to its entire purpose. I'd describe it as a living arrangement having attributes of both country and urban living but without the advantages of neither.

Psychological profiling assessment aside, that's not my point. And the democracy smokescreen won't fly here. Find all the excuses you want to avoid my point. Its not about the candidates. Its about the voters and the choice they face. Its a clear and unambiguous choice. If you want our country to be cowardly then vote for the coward.

Simply Trump isn't afraid to speak his mind (like what he has to say or not) to the media as demonstrated by his coming appearance on Rogan's show and Harris is a coward that hides from the press and the public, lets proxy celebrities and personalities do her talking, and is frightened by basic questions from interviewers and common citizens. And when challenged with a tough question produces babbling, incoherent, and dodging the question type answers. If you want a coward for your President than you can expect our country to take on the personality of a coward too. That's pretty much it.

I don't even see it as blue vs. red. I see a conflict or disagreement between people that are comfortable with and support the centralization of power and control in Washington and people that want power and control over specific activities to reside at the State and local level.

The people losing it are the Democrats and their MSM allies. They're in desperation mode going "all in" on the whomever I don't like is comparable to Hitler tactic. I don't think its going to work too well. This act just smells old and stale. Most undecided voters are focused on issues that are important to them personally. Inflation, crime, the economy, real stuff, not made up fabrications and lies. What we have at this point is smear tactics and fake stories from a desperate candidate and her supporters that appears to be doing what they call in horse racing is "dying in the stretch". And the authoritarian tag coming from people that themselves exhibit authoritarian tendencies and actions is the height of hypocrisy. Why I remember a large plurality of liberals thought it appropriate during COVID to do things like forcefully placing people that don't get the shot in quarantine camps and tracking and monitoring the whereabouts of the unvaccinatged. And these are the people saying Trump is Hitler? Wake up idiots. Look at yourselves! I expect if Trump wins they'll all be putting on their Storm Trooper uniforms and boots while taking to the streets to riot. And fighting the certification of the election. Where have we heard that's a threat to Democracy before?

Pointing out the fact (facts, remember those?) that we faced a formidable foe in WW2 isn't pissing on anyone. And if you want to point out getting rid of things let's discuss our non-existent southern border that vanished under Biden/Harris. Which if elected she'll continue. And from where I'm sitting the dumb asses elected the crew running the show at the moment and they've managed to FUBAR everything they touch. I can't imagine how the term of a mind blowing imbecile like Harris will play out. How much worse can it get? Hopefully, we won't find out. One thing for sure, you're cult is scared and crapping their knickers over the possibility of a Trump victory. Look at how desperate you all are now. I watched the beginning of Good Morning America today and wondered if people in the former Soviet Union has the same reaction I did this morning morning as they watched TASS news propaganda? It was so completely and obviously biased and desperate that my first reaction was laughter. How those douches can continue to call themselves "news" is puzzling.

You guys need to get your lies straight. One is Trump is old and senile. The other is he's a plotting and clever fascist bent on acquiring dictatorial powers. In the end both narratives are horseshit. Rather, desperate attempts to cling to power through the usual character assassination. Not really. Germany's military leadership was highly effective. It was Hitler's terrible strategic decisions that sunk Germany. That's why the allies hesitated to carry out assassination attempts. The risk was enabling somebody that knew what they were doing to take charge.

If they picked up another player before the deadline instead of another WR it should be a defender that can get the defense over-the-top to hold a lead against the Chiefs at the end of the game.

Trade is Tulsi Gabbard for Liz Chaney and a conditional 4th rounder.

I gave it my best shot to answer these questions from my perspective. Most of my answers are non-committal and that's because I interpret most of the questions as highly subjective without being provided any context or details.

What are the survey questions?

Its was the Democrats version of the Reichstag fire.

Because they can't debate or support the record of this awful administration and their crash dummy candidate. What have they accomplished in 3 1/2 years other than to spread chaos and decay?

Nobody cares about 1/6 anymore. They're focused on the damage Biden/Harris has caused in the past 3 1/2 years.

The whole thing was fake. Just like her new personality. What candidate that claims to be qualified to be President is afraid to take unscripted questions from American citizens? Harris, thats's who. They're trying to pull off the big lie here. She's just not qualified to serve and if Democrats did their due diligence instead of letting the rich donors and special interests running the DNC make a mockery of the selection process they'd have chosen somebody else. Trump for all his faults is a better choice but TDS victims and never Trumpers would support a crash dummy. And they are.

The majority of these cases never made it to court for a fair hearing on the merits of the evidence. DNC paid legal teams fought every challenge and the majority were dismissed on procedural grounds or because of "process" issues. And not for a lack of evidence. This time the cheaters won't have the element of surprise in their favor.

If Trump prevails you guys can dial 988 Or click here: https://www.nami.org/Advocacy/Policy-Priorities/Responding-to-Crises/National-Hotline-for-Mental-Health-Crises-and-Suicide-Prevention/

Based on the Peter Principal it appears Kamala peaked 40 years ago.

The last thing the party leadership and billionaire donors wanted was to put somebody into the presidency that had the personal strength and vision to bring ideas and positions to a new administration that conflicted with the party's agenda. So they took a crash dummy VP they can control and created a marketing campaign around the idea she brings "change" with a high level of competency. The party faithful bought into the hustle while nobody seems to ask how an incumbent party VP can campaign on change while saying she wouldn't change anything about the Biden administration. So 4 more years of the same instead? Given high levels of dissatisfaction with certain polices that wouldn't sell well to the all important independent vote. So lie instead.

Everything about Harris is staged, scripted, controlled. Are you capable of comprehending this?

That's why it's so easy to get all these funding initiatives through without much pushback. If they said we're raising your taxes by 400 million to pay for this it might receive a different response. But for "free"? Sure let's fund everything. Donate billions to end "cat juggling" in Mexico too.

Your message is approved by government censors. It is not false. If prices of some goods rise then you can purchase a smaller amount of goods and services absent any increase in income or money supply. If there are 2 goods in the economy A and B and both cost 10 units of currency and your income is 100 units of currency you can buy a quantity of A and B equal to a quantity of 10 items. If the price of A goes from 10 to 20 and the price of B remains at 10 you can now only buy 5 units of A or 10 units of B. Or some combination equal to 100 units of currency. Your faced with a choice of cutting your consumption of A or B or both. This is what Americans are experiencing especially lower and fixed income consumers. The only way you can maintain the same level of consumption is to increase income or money supply.

It doesn't work that way. Overall prices can't rise absent an increase in the money supply. And in the case of our economy, massive government spending. Borrowing trillions against the future. That's the mistake economists and policy makers always make regardless of which party is in charge or who is running the Fed. If you want to stop or lower inflation, stop printing money and increasing the money supply. Why it doesn't happen is nobody wants to impose or experience the downside of controlling inflation.

If you really want to punish them, instead of deportation send them to Cleveland and force them to convert to Browns fans! I understand when given a choice between this and the electric chair, death row inmates choose the chair.