All_Pro_Bills

The fundamental unaddressed question is who is giving the order to White House aides to forbid the President from answering any questions in public situations? As there is no official above the rank of President in the executive branch the conclusion is some rogue unelected element is in charge of our government. Yet there is absolutely no enthusiasm from anywhere to question or expose this troubling situation. It speaks to how much control and power these shadow figures hold.

And yet the fact is more people have been impoverished, imprisoned, and murdered until the flag of left wing communism and socialism than any other political ideology. Nothing's worse than these leftist weasels that claim to champion the rights and issues of the little guy while trampling all over them.

They were all out of the office attending Diversity & Gender Awareness training that week. While they can name 20 to 30 correct gender pronouns none of them have any clue how to execute a successful military operation. And as core competency in military tactics and strategy is no longer a requirement to be a US General their job performance rating remains excellent.

Yes, if only everyone would obediently and blindly follow the politically driven directives and commands of the government that ignore all sorts of medical and scientific facts then everything would be just fantastic. But check the stats my friend. The most vaccine hesitant groups are blacks, hispanics, and PHD's. Generally not what I suspect are core Trump "supporters".

And obviously you've also enrolled in a fictional writing class.

The root problem is "want" is infinite. Resources are finite.

Yet ironically, the great unifier, Biden is the one enacting policies that are causing people to lose their jobs and their freedoms while creating a class system based on vaccination status while coercing and forcing people to act against their will to get back the freedoms stolen by the government. Dividing the American people and pitting them against one another.

To me immunity means I'm vaccinated and I can't get sick. Period. That is the expectation people have when they get vaccinated for some specific ailment or disease. And that is the expectation officials set with the original vaccine rollouts. Get the shot and life returns to "normal". Now the word used more often than not is "protection" meaning you might get sick but not as bad as if you didn't get the shot. Can you quantify statements like "do not stay infected as long"? Or point me to the source of data that I can access to find or calculate those figures for myself? My suspicion is the data on these kinds of metrics is a bit muddled. As for Ivermectin I would point to actual field use in India that is credited by officials and medical professionals there for significantly contributing to the suppression of the Delta outbreak. And while the drug gets bad mouthed to death here in the US because it is also used to treat animals (not really that unusual a thing) I find it interesting that Pfizer is in the process of trialing a protease inhibitor molecule that is surprising similar to Ivermectin in chemical make up and function. In some respects identical. It would come at no surprise if their new offering gains fast approval as a legitimate treatment at something like 30x the price.

That all makes sense. And I generally agree with your posts. For me the main point of contention is the governments official policy that insists that only the vaccine can provide any protection from the virus. No exceptions. No natural immunity exceptions, no exceptions for low-risk individuals, no exceptions for treatment options, no exceptions for anything. Get vaccinated or else. Lose your freedoms, lose you job, lose your life. Do what we say. Anyone that questions this is called either stupid or uninformed. Even though the vaccine does not provide immunity. It provides protection as vaccinated people can get sick and in some cases die. Even though the vaccine does not stop transmission. Vaccinated people can infect others. Even though it does not kill the virus. Vaccinated people can carry a viral load. This policy claims to be supported by science. Science that is conveniently used or ignored as necessary. Much of the science is in obvious conflict with this policy. This policy is not medically driven. Its is politically and socially driven. Getting vaccinated is most likely a good idea for most people. But the government's official policy is dysfunctional.

Trump did not collude with Russia. That narrative is a proven lie. That is an undisputable fact. I've asked you to provide proof of charges, indictments, evidence, trials, convictions, proof of any kind. Yet you have produced nothing because nothing exists. The Mueller investigation provided nothing. The media propagandists provided nothing but personal opinion, devoid of facts or evidence. You need to stop this. Its not good for your health and believing something that is a fantasy is unhealthy too.

The American social justice crowd is okay with all of this. Just keep the Rainbow flag flying over the Embassy and they'll be happy to look the other way. And since they've got their heads up Biden's ass it all looks like living in total darkness anyway.

Cohen is a notorious spreader and generator of fake news.

From what I saw: Protesters casually walking around inside the Capitol building like a regular day at some Disney World exhibit. Real insurrectionist stuff. So far it appears the video contradicts the narrative and talking points. But the radical left has a real expertise in quickly pushing false narratives out to the public through their stooges in the media and assorted "experts" in order to get in front of the facts before they become available. And then pound away at it until they get their way or the whole thing falls apart and they move on to the next false narrative. It seems nothing they believe is real. This isn't and never was about insurrection or threats to democracy. This is all about a power grab opportunity. Plain and simple. It's about a political party using the events of January 6th as an opportunity and an excuse for restricting the rights of Americans to express their political views. And using a subsequent staged Committee investigation following it as a ruse to criminalize views they oppose. I suspect it will not go as well as they expected.

I rest easier at night knowing that our government is on the job here allocating limitless resources and funds to pursue charges against petty law breakers while ignoring drug cartels and sex traffickers crossing the border unimpeded, as smuggled opioids kill thousands, criminals run free in cities processed under a catch and release experiment which provides them the privilege of committing limitless crimes without consequences, international terrorist groups operate undeterred, and our foreign enemies laugh themselves into a coma while contemplating the threat they face from our Mummy in Chief as he pursues a policy of pussification of our once tough and ready military. And with any luck the entire economy and the markets will be in the waste basket soon too. Thankfully the 2022 mid-term elections are coming to flush the foul stench of this dysfunctional regime down the toilet.

Its been a while since I was in Texas but I remember there were a lot of great strip clubs in Dallas. In my assessment the women were all 8+ to 10's. So focusing on what's important the Lincoln Project can suck it. LOL.

A few days before the Steelers game I had a dream the Bills lost the game. I had no such dream about the Dolphins game or any such dream about the Washington game to this point. I also had a dream about two tall blonde attractive women wearing black leather. Unfortunately I woke up before it went any further..

Thanks for the insights..

Here's what puzzles me. Out of intellectual curiosity if it's so incontrovertible then why are many of what I expect are the most knowledgeable about the virus and the vaccination, health care workers, hesitant to get vaccinated? If all was on the up-and-up I'd expect there would be absolutely no reason or need to apply coercion and force to this segment of the population given their access to and knowledge of COVID information. Could it be stats like the FDA severe adverse events reporting of 7,899 deaths following vaccination as of 9/20/21. How does that count compare to other "safe" vaccines?

I'd expect the infection rate of COVID "while hospitalized" is extremely low at this point of the pandemic. But I don't have that stat handy and while it sounds like a potential patient safety issue before knowing the 1 chance in X risk I can't say for sure whether or not having un-vaccinated hospital workers is an actual patient safety issue. The hospitals I'm familiar with have solid safety protocols in place for patients and workers along with visitors and there isn't any major concern about in-hospital transmission outbreaks. What I'm not sure about in a lot of these conversations is if posters have a "zero" defect objective or goal when expressing their positions. The one death is too many mentality. Generally here, the majority of hospital workers were the first group of people vaccinated and un-vaccinated workers infecting patients hasn't been an issue. Nursing homes with elderly high risk patient populations and less process in place are another story.

Let's not forget the Federal debt limit vote where the majority in the Senate is looking for 10 Republican votes to reach a 60 vote minimum to pass. Otherwise they can go the reconciliation route which is expected to produce a 50-50 split with the VP casting the tie breakers but that vote along party lines would lay all the debt on the Dems. So lots of intrigue to go along with all the wasteful spending with borrowed money never to be paid back that will be monetized by the Fed while they also claim to be pursuing a policy of "tapering" debt purchases which by itself is another joke. Quite the tragic comedy we have going here.

If you believe I am in any way expressing anger then we're just not communicated effectively here. I would support exemptions if proof was presented that the participants in the event posed zero threat to each other but that simply isn't true. Officials are making a wild and false assumption that vaccinated people can't get sick and can't transmit the virus and that is medically known to be false. So exemptions are bogus.

The fundamental problem is proof of vaccination is not synonymous with being immune to getting infected or being incapable of transmitting the virus to someone else or incapable of carrying the virus in your system. As long as this unqualified potential is ignored by people making public policy that policy will be flawed. People will continue to get sick and transmit the virus to others vaccinated or not. And sure anybody that wants to can make the argument the shot provides "protection" and lowers the risk of both getting sick and transmitted the virus, which I have little doubt is true. But I also suspect the data is muddled and these "breakthrough cases" happen a lot more often than vaccine proponents would like to admit and the preference through the official message is to ignore the topic rather than to find out the answer.

So if its not the President directing his subordinate aides to cut off questions then what is the name of the person directing these WH staff members to cut off questions? And who defined the policy of cutting off questions that these people act under? If the President isn't "allowed" to answer questions from the press at his public appearances then our government is being run by somebody else. Somebody else that is not elected to do so. The President is a figurehead, a puppet, a front man, take your pick of terms. This should concern every American whether you support Biden or not or whether or not you voted for Biden. Ultimately I'd expect Biden voters should be outraged that the person they elected is not running the country. But rather some other actor behind the scenes. If this doesn't meet the criteria of a coup or subversive takeover of our government then what does? I would think this is the biggest story of the present time yet it gets little to no air play. Who is calling the shots in the White House?

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

Amy's resume checks all the social justice and virtue signalling boxes but she appears to be gaslighting here or just simply oblivious to the current authoritarian threat now seated in the White House and Congressional leadership while focusing on imaginary and fabricated threats. Smart people, dumb thoughts.