All_Pro_Bills

I find it futile to engage in topics related to law-and-order with the authoritarian left. If its a political opponent then maximum sentences, automatic assumptions of guilt, and showing no mercy applies. But if it applies to popular positions like de-fund the police, looting is a form of reparations, no bail for crimes, lenient prosecutors refusing to prosecute violent criminals, drug infested encampments on city streets, eliminate prisons, events like CHAZ, and so on then they're all on board with ignoring or breaking the law or giving criminals a pass to go out and commit more crimes. Because political opponents are dangerous criminals and economic or social criminals are victims.

I could agree with your disarming theory under different circumstances. Such as a nightclub, a school, a church, or a shopping center, for examples. Situations where people are going about their business without intent to cause harm to persons or property. Situations where the motives and intent of individuals present are very clear. But under the context of a riot in progress, where police and civil authority are unwilling to act or intervene, and some number of the crowd are committing criminal acts consistent with rioting and looting? An environment where lawlessness is the temporary norm of behavior? I can't agree.

The current cast of players that present and believe themselves to be progressives or liberals are in reality authoritarians and supporters of the use of the triumvirate of big central government, main stream big media, and big tech as a tool of oppression of their social and political enemies. Their tactics are no different from Fascists, Nazi's, Stalinist's, Maoists, whatever you want to call them, yet they believe themselves to be of great virtue and enlightenment. They are the worst kind of fanatics. They believe their own lies. Every solution they advocate for every problem involves big government with a heavy dose of force and coercion. The idea that the individual has rights to things like self-determination absent government control is inconceivable to them. Traditional Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives., moderate Democrats, and people that think of themselves as Independents that still believe reasoning things out with them or attempting compromise are fools.

Who was charged with terrorism on 1/6? Kenosia is about real events and not some imaginary scenario or some false comparison.

No matter who the broadcast crew is we've started a drinking game during the TV broadcast. Whenever they say the word "pressure" everyone does a shot. But as its gotten so popular with the crews we've had to scale it back to a sip of your beer or else everybody would be passed out before halftime. Maybe they use the term 60 or 70 times during the game.

To this point the MSM has pretty much created their own version of what's transpired in the courtroom from day one. If you watched any of the trial on TV and then compared that experience with the opinions and observations of political hacks like Lemon and Cuomo you might get the idea there are two different trials going on at the same time. The one you're watching and the one they're commenting about. What they also have a penchant for is taking a situation where one man is on trial and extrapolating it into an indictment of society complete with their favorite social justice narratives. Its not Rittenhouse that's on trial its all of America. A specific segment of America. As for the MSM at the end of the day if the jury decides on an acquittal my bet is the narrative and conclusion will be its because the judge, the defendant, defense counsel, the jury, and all the witnesses are all White Supremacists. All commanded by some invisible force that organizes secret calls and meetings in order to conspire with the Wisconsin court system while also tampering with the jury. Immediately following will be howls and cries for a Federal investigation by the DOJ into potential Civil Rights violations which Garland will instruct attorneys at the DOJ to pursue. Then watch and wait for that to flop too.

She'll shoot him in the face if he doesn't appear. Then lead the committee's search party to find Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that intelligence sources believe were taken by Bigfoot.

Appeals Court re-affirms stay on Biden vaccine OSHA rule mandate. Likely headed to a Supreme Court test. "The mandate is staggeringly overbroad," the opinion said adding that the vaccine mandate "raises serious constitutional concerns" and "likely exceeds the federal government’s authority." Proponents argued the mandates serve the public interest and they are necessary to put an end to the nearly two-year coronavirus pandemic. The court commented "the public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions - even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials". https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/11/12/appeals-court-hits-brakes-biden-covid-19-vaccine-rule-employers/6359969001/

Well, one theory is that in the face of evidence there would be a very large and potentially violent crowd of protesters that day a decision was made to not augment security and leave a standard security detail in place at the Capitol in order to allow or trigger a rather uneventful "riot" to occur that resulted in no loss of life or physical harm to anyone of consequence in order to use the chaos of the event as pretext for justifying the issuing some draconian restrictions on opposition political activity and free speech.

That's it. And to stack the deck further that's why Nancy vetoed all Republican committee appointment names that would be unfriendly to a politically motivated course of business. That's not how the house committee appointment process works. The majority does not have veto power over minority appointments. In my view, one reason why this committee is illegitimate and nothing more than a political show to placate the base hungry for a win. In the end they'll prove nothing but provide lots of suspicions and conclusions that will allow the faithful to still believe the narrative.

Remember back when the vaccines first appeared and the talk from officials like Fauci was about the need to get as many people vaccinated as possible so we can achieve "herd immunity"? Herd immunity was 60%, then 70%, then higher still. Cutting to the chase, if the vaccine does not grant immunity, either short-term or permanent, then how can we ever possibly achieve herd immunity? Because nobody being just vaccinated is immune, period. Right? Maybe the goal should be "herd protection"? Then there's the debate over natural vs. vaccination immunity and protection. Although we know the vaccine provides no immunity we insist it is "better" than natural immunity from infection and recovery. Call me skeptical of that conclusion based on the evidence. So the truth is the vaccine provides the patient with protection. Protection that is not very well defined empirically or objectively but protection said to be against serious illness or death. But not immunity from serious illness or death from the virus. So how much less of a threat is a vaccinated person to give me the virus than an un-vaccinated person? It depends. On when you got vaccinated, on when others got vaccinated, on your specific health profile, on the specific heatlh profile of others, on if the un-vaccinated people you come into contact with have ever had COVID and when they might have had it. My conclusion from all this is vaccinating every single person is not going to eliminate the virus from society. And the vaccine is simply a treatment. And other treatments are other potential options. And they should be embraced and not casually dismissed. My concern is health officials know this, they've known this from day one. And yet they still push vaccination as the only legitimate approach. And continue to disparage treatment options. And provide no standard of care options for when people get infected. Stay home and if you get sicker go to the hospital. That's the best we can do? I don't believe that.

CNN and MSNBC commentators are already declaring that legal due process isn't required and Bannon will be sentenced tomorrow to 3,000 years in prison while encouraging the administration to apply water boarding and other torture methods to force a confession. Up next CNN praises President Xi's proclamation at the party Congress making him President for life followed by an NBC news humanitarian story of the Taliban preparing Thanksgiving meals for the homeless and a concerning MSNBC story from Joy Reid about Satanic worshiping White Supremist Trump supporters seen sacrificing animals and drinking their blood on video taken during the 1/6 protests. Meanwhile, Brandon has been sited wandering across the White House lawn after his standard 5 hour afternoon nap.

You're allowed to steal $950 worth of goods without being arrested and charged. The city says the policy in addition to providing free goods to motivated criminals also enhances basic math skills as they need to be proficient enough with addition to make sure to calculate their total theft value stays under the legal allowable limit. SAT math scores in the area are already up 20 points. Education officials are proclaiming this a great achievement for math equity and social justice leading to making math less racist. Good bless America. Now get me some of those free fillets and crab cakes along with a bag of those extra large baking potatoes and lets hit Footlocker and Best Buy next!

Not victims, preps trying to kill some guy that shot them. So are we running with the biased judge narrative from here? On the other hand just use your imagination and visualize Rittenhouse was a BLM activist and you can advocate for his innocence and decry the injustices of the legal system.

No they're targeting political descent to their insane policies. You just can't and won't admit it. Period. But for fun say you're right. Tell me how many law breakers were arrested, held without bail, in solitary confinement, while waiting months for formal charges, and were convicted, and sent to prison because of looting, attacking people, burning buildings, attacking police, and committing other violent acts during the BLM and Antifa riots? How many? Prove me wrong. Stay on topic. Given me a straight answer. How many rioters did these Democratic administrations and prosecutors put away?

Inciting a riot is a crime. Bringing that up doesn't justify or excuse the Democrats weaponizing the mechanisms of government for political purposes. Specifically to use it for the persecution and punishment of their political enemies with a passion for maximum sentences for mostly petty charges. Make no mistake. That is what's driving this 1/6 investigation. How else would you explain a political class that has no interest in law and order, advocating instead de-funding police, zero bail arrangements, dismantling the prison system, and other anti-law enforcement initiative and ideas, having such a great obsession for law and order when it comes to this one situation? A political event gone bad. Are we expected to believe the members of the committee who embrace holding suspects indefinitely without bail and in confinement on misdemeanor charges would endorse and support no bail and solitary confinement for a similar situation of a suspect accused of criminal trespass at the local WalMart?

From a quick glance at this mornings press clippings it appears the MSM's next move here is to attack the credibility and character of the judge. I assume the jury will be next.

This statement is representative of the lefts mindset. Liberals that advocate for de-fund the police, prison and sentencing reform, SWAT teams dragging their political enemies out of their homes at 3 AM with media present to record the event, and advocate for changes in the criminal justice system for rapists, murders, and other criminals while applauding the militarization of the Capitol area have no issue with long sentences and weaponizing the criminal justice system when it comes to punishing their real or perceived political enemies. The message the left is sending is you can rape, murder, and commit other crimes against people and property and we will fight for you to get off easy but don't oppose our political program and ideology or we'll bring down the hammer on you. Obey and comply with our agenda. Remember this next time you hear or read about some goofball fringe nut job reciting the scripture about the unfairness of the criminal justice system.

They've got a thousand and one excuses for avoiding the truth that fringe left policies once fully exposed to the light of day are being rejected by the majority. The bottom line, their ideas and ideology suck.

We all know that BLM and Antifa were responsible for almost all the property damage and street violence that occurred in 2020. And I expect that if leftist rioters didn't attack him then Rittenhouse would not have shot them. The common sense lesson here is if you don't want to be shot then don't attack somebody that's armed.

You know perfectly well I'm referring to BLM and Antifa rioters along with their associated activist that get a free pass from prosecution.

Kimmel is not doing Harris any favors by reminding the country she is the VP. My suspicion is she's consciously keeping a low profile hoping to fly under the radar until 2024. I had forgotten she was the VP until I read a poll this week saying her approval rating was at 30%.

But in Wisconsin gangs of armed looters and rioters can legally assault and murder minors that are prohibited from defending themselves..

An examination of protests in the past year or so will reveal that when the leftist crowd riots the cops get stand-down orders and the event is characterized as "peaceful protest" and activism in support of social justice. When anyone else riots or protests its an insurrection and threat to democracy which requires a merciless application of justice and enforcement of law and order.

The basic problem is leftist rioters get a pass from weak and gutless liberal government officials that worship an insane ideology so they don't care about the safety and security of their citizens. Which gives the "protesters" an exemption from the law when it comes to street violence. They can attack people in the streets, burn down buildings, destroy property, and loot stores without consequences. When a couple of them get shot dead and another wounded because they picked on the wrong guy they all piss and moan not fair!