All_Pro_Bills

One of woke religion's core commandments and supernatural fantasies. A man "wishing" to be a woman shall be a woman. And magically through self-identification he becomes a women regardless of the facts that science and biology contradicts this belief. Mysticism such as wokeness is not built on a foundation of facts. But, it is forbidden for a white man following the same practice of self-identification to believe he is a black man. Regardless of the fact a white man is genetically and biologically more similar to a black man than he is to a white woman. This is the kind of lunacy these women swimmers have to deal with here.

The bigger question is are the current vaccine formulas effective against Omicron?

Another Omicron case found in Minnesota. "The person with the Omicron variant is an adult male, is a resident of Hennepin County, and had been vaccinated. The person developed mild symptoms on Nov. 22 and sought COVID-19 testing on Nov. 24. The person’s symptoms have resolved."

Why are Congress and the DOJ withholding information from those they prosecute who have every right to this information? Because as always, the lying scrum bags are bluffing their way through most of it and when challenged attempt to "invoke the cone of silence" if they get called out.

Okay. And maybe I have a completely different question. So how does a clinical researcher supporting a vaccine trial determine whether or not an effective immune response was generated by the vaccine in the subject? Unless you can measure some biomarker or antibody level before the trial to produce a baseline for the subject and during or after the trial how can you determine the effectiveness of the vaccine in producing an immune response?

The Buffalo region is reporting a 7-day rolling average of 69.66 cases per 100K residents. That translates to 785.72 total cases per day. Elevated not approaching anything critical. I question if there is a capacity issue at hospitals as a result of being overwhelmed by hospitalized COVID cases (12% of NYS ICU beds are COVID patients) or if its a staffing problem resulting for the government and hosptial mandated policy of dismissing or firing un-vaccinated health care workers.

Link I posted on another thread from Johns Hopkins on hospitalization numbers and rates for ICU and Inpatient care. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/hospitalization-7-day-trend/inpatient-capacity

They can just say the Presidents condition was a "national security issue" which supersedes any guidelines or rules created by the FDA. That excuse always works for everybody else whenever the government gets caught doing something without any exceptions and they always get away with it.

I'm not a virologist but what I've been told is that as viruses mutate they typically become more contagious and less severe. The initial assessment from South African doctors treating the first cases discovered appears to support that premise. Symptoms were fatigue, muscle soreness, and cough. With no elevated fever, respiratory distress, or loss of senses of taste or smell like found in previous variants. Cases were characterized as mild, very mild. So before running out an giving 100's of millions of booster shots it might be a good idea to do some risk assessment and some due diligence on the cases being found and tracked. If the mortality rate is trending towards zero it would be better to let a mild strain run its course, produce natural immunity, effectively treat the more severely sick, and end pandemic phase here in the next 6 to 9 months give or take.

He finds offensive lineman that can block well. That's the secret..

It's an interesting question. What level or threshold of anti-bodies or some other biomarkers provides protection or immunity? We could review the criteria used in the P3 trials results for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to understand and identify what criteria they applied, anti-body levels or other metrics, to determine efficacy. Pfizer claims an efficacy rate of 95.1% and Moderna 94%. So how did they measure this? I suggest the answer to this question is the answer. But I'm not sure all the actual data from the trial or control groups are available as the FDA has met requests from researchers for access to the raw data with the reply that the public disclosure of the application and trial data submitted to the agency will be completed in the year 2076. And some wonder why there might be a tendency to generate conspiracy theories and other concerns? I mean, this is preposterous by any measure of preposterousness. The first question that comes to mind is "what are you hiding?"

I'd suggest Fauci burn in Hell for all eternity but how can that happen to the Devil?

This is an attempt to invoke the cleanest pig in the mudhole argument. Okay so Biden is dirty but Trump is dirtier. Whether true or not the problem with the argument is the previous pig is no longer making any decisions or setting policies. So almost a year into the Biden administration anything Trump did or didn't do is irrelevant. And the only purpose bringing him up serves is to deflect or avoid the direct discussion of Biden's record to date, policies, and decisions.

First case shows up in California. A vaccinated traveler recently returned from South Africa quarantining with mild symptoms.

My point isn't that its tough or not tough. My point is its impossible following the current strategy. Renewable sources will not replace all the energy output for applications that use oil and gas while supporting current living standards at current scale and capacity. I'm not sure all the resources needed exist on the planet. And most people have no comprehension that the physical world has limits and constraints. Just checking the mining industry that produces the necessary mineral inputs will reveal how resource grades and quality have fallen, and continue to fall over time while needed to go to more remote places. That means more expensive and energy intensive operations are needed. Maybe the Greens think mining for inputs to build EV's and solar panels doesn't consume and use energy. They're in for quite a shock! Where do they think plastics come from? Don't worry, There's plenty of metals and minerals because we're going to send missions into space to mine asteroids beyond Mars! Its almost delusional. So not tough but impossible and the path to least resistance is to downsize everyone's energy footprint. That's the future path here. Downsizing. I don't think people are either prepared for this outcome or willing to accept it. Maybe that's why nobody ever talks about it? Somebody build a demonstration project of scale at 100K city or community and run it solely on renewables without any oil or gas. Proof of concept level stuff before we go all in on a potentially dead-end strategy. When I drive down the street I see signs like "Climate Action, NOW!" on the front lawn of some houses. Then I think to myself, "Yeah, climate action now. Says the guy down the street in the 4,000 sq ft. house with 2 zone heat and AC, 3 SUV's in the driveway with a landscaping crew that just cut down 1/2 of all the large trees absorbing CO2 on their property. Sure this is going to all work out great..

Official narrative: Un-vaccinated patients are overwhelming the US hosptial system. True or False. Check the numbers from Johns Hopkins hospital ICU and Inpatient numbers and rates on any State you'd like to see. ICU capacity, overall occupancy rates, COVID counts, non-COVID counts, And draw conclusions. (Spoiler alert: nationally COVID patients occupy 16.8% of ICU beds & 8% of total inpatient beds) https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/hospitalization-7-day-trend/

I want to see how Jones handles the expected cold and wind conditions Monday night. I'll be surprised if it doesn't give him some trouble. With Allen the Bills don't have that problem.

I support the idea of clean energy and a clean environment but more than a lie the Green New Deal is a dangerous fantasy. They have a lot of people believing there is some simple, unplug and plug in, solution available if only it was just implemented. But the idea that currently available renewables and alternative energy sources can replace conventional energy sources while supporting a continued advance in living standards and "progress" is false. You can throw in all the assumptions and expectations of future advancements in technology you want but none of that is a certainty and most of it is far off into the future. An analysis of resource requirements, costs, energy efficiency, and other variables shows the math just doesn't work. Just taking motor fleet energy requirements as one example. You need the daily energy output of 29 standard 2by4 solar panels to equal the energy output of 1 gallon of gasoline. Not to mention solar power output is dependent on the amount of sunlight, the time of year, and the latitude of the installation. The US fleet consumes about 9.3 million barrels a day of gasoline. So how many solar panels do you need? The math is 9,300,000 barrels times 42 gallons per barrel time 29 panel per gallon. So show me the plan for supplying those panels and distributing that energy to the market? Or maybe just eliminate 75% of the vehicles on the road which is closer to reality than the plan they have right now. And that's just one small part of the Green replacement of conventional energy. Show me the plan for solar and wind powered commercial coast-to-coast aviation by something equivalent to jet aircraft. Or the plan to convert the biggest single user of conventional energy, the US military, to renewables. A solar powered fleet of F-35 jet fighters. I'll believe it when I see it.

I doubt any of the Russia experts at the Pentagon or the intelligence services believes it. At the present time there is absolutely no strategic advantage or benefit from such a move. Its all just posturing for the moment.

Because at the end of the day all the people claiming to be into social justice and other causes support the authoritarian political establishment. That's the end result of it all. The Bush's, Clinton's, Biden, and Obama, a junior Senator from Illinois that came out of obscurity to win the Presidency twice in what suddenly became a "racist" America when Trump took office. Bush was a war criminal to the left but now the media portrays him as some kind of hero for opposing Trump. Even though his administration is responsible for the imposition of the security state after 9/11 which eliminated the basic concepts of personal privacy. Trump was an outsider plain and simple. An anti-establishment, anti-globalist, pro-nationalist, America first guy that might spoil the party and certainly would interrupt it on the road to the globalist goal of eliminating the concept of the nation state. A global system which of course anoints the billionaire class as rulers. And the idiots on the left fall in, and support this objective. Are they really embracing rule by billionaire businessmen or just stupid? Maybe they can explain? Trump's views and policies didn't matter. Or the fact he was a Republican. It didn't matter. It could have been Bernie Sanders, it could have been Tulsi Gabbard. It could have been any outsider that pulled an upset. The establishment would be given them the same treatment. Whatever the left is thinking this objective achieved is not going to turn out good for the average person and whatever fantasies they want to believe they're not going to be exempt from any of it.

Honestly, I'm pretty loose about the Monday night game. But I'm not out there playing. I think the Bills will bring their best here. I'm expecting a win. It happened quickly but they seem to be back to the underdog role with lots of experts and media jumping back on the NE bandwagon after a year off. The underdog role seems to get the team playing with an edge to their game. And not that uptight mistake prone type of performance. I'm not concerned about the number one seed or the division title because for some reason, maybe they get too amped up at home, this team plays a more complete and composed game on the road. For me, just make the playoffs and anything can happen.

White House staff decided at the last minute to shelve the talking points around funding and training looting flash mobs to steal boats and other water craft in order to sail out to the harbor to directly loot cargo ships suggesting this will assist the ports in unloading the ships more quickly. While also praising the entrepreneurial spirit and initiative of the looters and criminal gangs. Media comments on the idea were extremely supportive as they praised the out of the box thinking culture that's been encouraged by leadership inside the administration. The administration also suggested international maritime law could be applied to avoid charging anyone with a crime under US law. Another big positive. All in all, a win/win idea.

Marxists that are all obsessively in love with the Trump. Proof being they eventually steer every conversation in that direction. When they're not posting nonsense about the virtues of oppressive and authoritarian government policies, I expect they're joyfully master baiting to videos of Trump speeches.

What's you definition of the common good? Is it something like The Borg on Star Trek? A collection of individuals assembled in some hive like society all surrendering their personal identities, opinions, desires, and beliefs for the "common good". Does anyone actually believe the government forcing people to act or not to act in a certain way is in any way equivalent to a scenario where the common good is the objective? You've got to be out of your mind to believe that.

I think the Bills have a more talented roster on offense with the defense being close to a "push". But they don't always play up to their potential while the Patriots, with few exceptions, are well prepared and playing close to or at their best. If both teams bring their best game the Bills should win but it will be tight and into the 4th quarter before its decided.