All_Pro_Bills

It was some made for TV fictional movie certain people here saw and they were so wasted they still think they were watching 60 minutes.

Everybody knows if you ask that question the next day you get a hunting trip invite from daddy. And before you know what happened your face gets mistaken for a Quail flying out of the bushes and you're apologizing to Dick for him shooting you in the face..

I'm not answering the question because your binary argument is irrelevant. You seem to be missing my primary theme in all my posts. My core position on every issue is that I'm against anything that gives the State more power over the individual to steal their freedoms and rights. Plain and simple. Anything that enhances the power of the security and surveillance state. Or the deep state. Or the globalist cabal. Whatever you want to call it. Threats to freedom. Threats to democracy. Threats to the Constitutional form of government. Suffering and hardship caused by government, their agents, and allies. Whether they be in government, business, or the media, or anywhere else. I'm not for or against all liberal causes or objectives or for or against all conservative causes. What I'm against are those on both sides of the isle that enable the imposition of control of citizens and curtailing or inhibiting their rights as individuals. And my primary issue with most liberals is they are complete fakes. Traditional liberals would never support any policy that curtails our freedoms and gives power to a malevolent central government. The current crop of neo-liberals seems to rejoice in stealing the rights of others. These are the people I oppose. They are the threats. And yes, certain elements on the right seek the same purpose. And I oppose them too. But you keep going back to Trump. Trump is a distraction. Being fixated about him while the agents and security apparatus of State slips in the back door and steals everything plays right into the hands of the State. The real threat. The State is the party that is spying on me, eavesdropping on my conversations, recording all my posts and comments, snooping into my bank account, telling me where I can go or what I can do. All together we can stop this.

Big surprise! Her family are sitting members of the security and surveillance state. If she wasn't then she wouldn't be on the committee. What else does anyone expect her to say? The conclusions and findings of this committee are already decided.

I suspect the indicators and statistics will show the economy is close or already in recession and the stock market is mis-pricing the impact of inflation and a contracting economy. One thing masking this is that about 20 to 25 large cap companies represent the majority of the market's capitalization. Watch these big cap stocks closely. When they start to break down that is a signal.

I'm interested in hearing your personal view on the meaning of democracy. Not the viewpoints of others or what other people did or didn't do.

Democracy without freedom is a charade. And once again your response is to present another litany of fantasy conspiracies from some alternative reality in which you must reside. You would be better served spending your time writing fictional stories. Or maybe you're just afraid to provide your definition of democracy rather than just shouting slogans and buzz words.

Why do activists and politicians on the left always refer to "democracy" but never once reference "freedom and rights". You'll never see this: ^^^MUST READ IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR FREEDOM AND RIGHTS - follow thread^^^ Before buying their narrative everyone should make sure to have a common understanding of terms and definitions. I suspect many will be disappointed to find their definition of the word democracy may not be consistent with yours. Which is simply the majority's right to dictate everything to the minority.

Defeated Antifa? I suspect a few well-positioned 50 calibers could do that public service and remove a major nuisance in a couple minutes without expending all the time, money, and effort to get elected, allegedly do this one thing right while screwing up everything else along with taking a nap for 10 months.

And I vote to hold the Committee in contempt.

Peppermint Patty! That's a good one. I don't know whether to pity or dislike Psaki. The requirement to constantly lie every day after day has to take its toll. Maybe she should consider taking a better job as a Horse Inseminator. It could be more satisfying and its within her current area of expertise of jerking everybody off every day!

The frustration for me is change the result of just 1 play out of about 7 or 8 plays that didn't go our way whether from poor execution or penalties and the result is the Bills win that game. Longer term I'm not worried about playoff seeding tiebreakers with the Titans. They'll stumble through the course of the season. Remember, they lost to the Jets so consistency might not be their strength. The other frustration is I have to get up very early every morning for work and staying up for Monday night games leaves me tired the next day. And its worse if we lose.

You can accept, avoid, or mitigate a risk. But first you need to understand and acknowledge the risk, quantify the risk, and define alternatives to the risk situation. None of this is possible when assessing long term risks to a vaccine with no long term use profile. So the other side of the coin is health and political officials have flippantly dismissed any and all concerns expressed about potential long term risks. In reality all they can truthfully and factually say is "specific to the COVID vaccines we don't know the long term risks or adverse impacts". But they claim expert status and claim to know the unknowable. That there is little to no long term risk. Most people objectively assessing the risk to themselves know they're full of crap.

I can't accept the idea that anyone can be this incompetent and clueless so the logical conclusion is they are screwing everything up by design. You listen to what Psaki says in these WH press briefings everyday. She's lying her ass off and she knows it, the press knows it, and the public knows it. And at some point they will say everything bad that is happening is because the "old" ways of doing things just don't work any more. And what we've been doing has been in response to those failures. And a new "vision" is needed going forward. Manufacture a crisis to produce the needs for a solution.

I'd like to understand from the mandate advocates here what checks and balances exist after all this that prevents the government and their corporate accomplishes from forcing you to do or not do anything and everything they want? Because its not the process of democracy. Its not the courts, Its not liberal or conservative leaders running Federal, State, or local governments. Its not your employer or your fellow employees. And it doesn't appear that the Constitution or Bill of Rights is in effect here either. So what's to stop them from mandating anything? Who is going to stop them if it isn't the people themselves? Maybe the Governor doesn't like Blue shirts. Or large SUV's. It could be anything. Its not about resisting the vaccine. Its about defending personal choice and freedoms. Its not about protecting you from the unwashed plebs that make a personal choice. And if you really believe the vaccine protects you then why are you afraid of them? If you believe the "safe and effective" mantra then they can't harm you. Its about the security state and gaining the voluntary compliance of the public to exchange their rights and freedoms for safety and security. The problem is the exchange is not equitable. The freedoms surrendered are real. But the safety and security are an illusion. Because the security state has no interests in your personal safety or security. Its interest is in protecting itself and acquiring more power and control at your expense. Why so many are blind to this is a testament to the power they already hold. This control is even reflected in propaganda communicated through popular culture network TV shows depicting the gallant and heroic members of organizations like the FBI risking life and limb to save the public from all kinds of threats real and imaged on a weekly basis. In reality it borders on comedy and the truth is something entirely different. When I see the network promos during the football games on Sunday I LMAO at it. Its all utterly ridiculous.

I'm not sure where you're going with this. The administration is weaponizing various Federal agencies against their political enemies. And colluding with tech giants to do so. Government and corporate combined in fascism. If you don't condemn it your a fascist too. Terrorizing school boards? They're punk weaklings that can't take the heat. You make it sound like rioters are dragging out and beating school board members. Get real. Stop the drama. They peddle all kinds of crap on defenseless and easy to push around children but when challenged by adults they want to hide and pretend it doesn't exist. Cowards can't stand a public debate because they're views are ridiculously idiotic. So they hide. And want Big Brother to protect them. Can't fight their own battles. Typical leftists who prefer to hide behind the nanny state's skirt rather than do their own fighting. Eventually that's why the left will lose this battle. Because at the end of the day they won't risk their own asses for their ideology. Which speaks poorly of their true level of conviction.

This is what you get when you apply different standard of behavior and morality to another time. The Aztecs sacrificed prisoners. The Romans were ruthless and brutal. By today's standards many historical figures and leaders can be judged harshly. The Taliban of today are brutal savages but their behavior is pretty consistent for what you'd expect a thousand or so years ago. Like most things morality and ethics are conditional and subject to change. I'd suggest if you had the ability to travel back in time and attempted to impose today's moral and ethical standards like in Jefferson's era they wouldn't understand or comprehend what you're talking about. The entire concept of "racism" would likely be incomprehensible to most. You'd likely be seen as an oddly acting fool. So today's moral thinkers characterize historical figures in a different more critical light. The same morally superior crew that chooses to cantonize George Floyd. Somebody that can also be portrayed as the patron saint of home invasion. A guy that held a gun to a pregnant women's stomach and threatened to kill her and her unborn child unless she cooperated. A career criminal and drug addict that apparently by chance happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time with some unhinged cop chocking the life out of him. Not exactly a heroes death. Both the moral and ethical crowd are perfectly willing to overlook his transgressions towards others to make their political point in our time. I can only hope and imagine that 50 years from now people will be wondering what kind of insanity griped the country during this era. And tear down memorials to a career criminal.

And the fact that we don't make anything here and are totally dependent on China which happens to be our number one threat. So how much leverage do you think China has over us? They send us real goods and we send back pieces of paper that are just IOU's to be redeemed later. Full containers come into US ports and "empties" are sent back. What do we have that they would want in exchange for those IOU's we've traded? Nothing. The bill for 30 years of dismantling US manufacturing capacity and eliminating millions of good paying jobs and destruction of thousands of small towns and cities in exchange for everyday low prices is coming due. At some point the concept of "you eat what you kill" is going to be re-instituted and if you don't produce anything then you don't consume anything either.

Apples and oranges. The difference is the left uses the power and force of the government to strongarm anyone that disagrees. I don't remember Trump sending the DOJ or the FBI after shoppers that still frequented Macy's. I also don't recall any actions to use Federal law enforcement to silence or punish Kaepernick. Or enact legislation to punish the NFL. He expressed his views and it was voluntary and left to the individual if they wanted to follow his led. But Garland is good with using the DOJ against parents wanting a say in schools. And Obama was okay with sending the IRS after organizations that disagreed with his political views. Or using their friends in social media to block and delete information that contradicts or opposes their views.

Your misrepresenting my view. I'm making no judgment about any system. I simply think Putin is a lot smarter than Biden and whether you like it or not has a holistic and coordinated master plan for the Russian state while Biden is fiddling around with social justice issues at the expense of all else. Your conclusion of my assessment that Putin is a better leader than Biden is consistent with saying I'm a Titans fan because I think Derrick Henry is a better RB than the Bills Singletary or Moss.

Unfortunately for us Putin is running laps around Biden & his clown show while always seeming to be 5 moves ahead.

Mostly peaceful insurrectionists committed to enhancing the quality of life for the citizens of our cities and towns.

The loss last night annoyed me more than it got me down on the team. Because no matter that the defense couldn't make a stop, or special teams penalties as usual screwed up a few good returns including McKenzie's TD, or that the offense left way too points on the table in the Red Zone, they were 1/2 foot away and an Allen slip on the turf from pulling it out. It was unfortunate. Maybe the Titans just have their number right now? Can anybody explain how the team we saw last night lost to the Jets? If you've seen the Jets play this season that seems impossible yet it happened. A bye week now and the loss feel like a flashback to last year's Cardinals game. They got focused, went to work, and ran the table down the stretch. Are they going to run the table here? Maybe not. But they have a week of rest and another week to fix a couple things. And looking ahead at the schedule the Bucs game might be the only game where the Bills will be the underdog.

Trump cult members are deranged but woke leftist believe there is no gender difference between men and women. And that a biological male can "believe" he is a woman and therefore he is a woman. Follow the science? Right? This is delusional mental illness. But my view is you can believe all kinds of fantasies and absurdities but just don't expect or try to make me believe them. I saw the stories about the "transsexual" rapists. In my old neighborhood if some dirt bag raped a girl and got away with it somebody would eventually pound the crap out of the creep and if they survived the beating he'd get the message real quick not to do it again.

I wasn't sure what Frazier was trying to do. Either try to contain Henry or not. His game plan put too much stress on the LB to play the run, react, and then drop into coverage which left lots of gaps over the middle that the QB exploited. Maybe not playing that base 4-2-5 and going with a 4-3-4 in early downs would have been better. They forced a total of two punts, the first two drives. In trying to balance stopping the run and play the pass he did neither. Also, I didn't see it here but my big issue so far this season is holding or block in the back on kick off and punt returns every game. I expect to see a flag before every return. How many times has field position been impacted on returns and last night on McKenzie's TD return? Illegal blocks that are not even part of the play. Clean that up over the bye week. Overall, the Bills lose a game 34-31 when going for a 4th and a couple feet because the line can't get push and Allen slips and can't get traction moving towards the line because the late night temperature drops below the dew point and the grass gets wet.