All_Pro_Bills

Make sure to use a coupon which Burger King typically sends via flyers in the mail. Whopper for two offer is good. Two Whoppers, two fries, and two drinks for $8.99. Unknown to most is you can sub out onion rings for fries without additional charge if you ask. McD's also has buy one, get one for $1 offer on Big Mac and Quarter Pounder and a few other items. Another thing I'm seeing go up in price a lot is Subs from local shops and the big chains. Up about 20% in just about 6 months. And happy Mother's Day to all mothers and everybody's mom on the board here..

Perfectly stated in liberal-speak buzz words and definitions. Racist, check. Conservative, check. Intolerant, check. And a real beauty, white grievance! Check, love it, I'm beginning to conclude you're a diversity trainer.

According to the story it was 60 voters in Clinton, Indiana for an election for the Township Board. It's a prime example of how little attention people really pay to issues and events. Its why the government gets away with things like the Homeland Security Disinformation Committee, the Russia hoax, endless wars, and other frauds and scams and hustles. And why they elected a zombie cast member from the Walking Dead series as President in 2020. But as I remember the late liberal comedian George Carlin saying politicians always push the sanctity of education when campaigning but "the last thing any government want is a population of critical thinkers".

If you read the Roe v. Wade ruling and conclusions its references the due process clause of the 14th amendment as covering a women's right to abortion but also gets into specific details such as specific treatment based on the specific trimester. Then in 1992 the court ruled again and modified the ruling by dropping the trimester approach for one of fetal viability. Doesn't that all sound "legislativish"? Because by the nature of our Republic form of government and the Constitutional powers of each branch the judicial does not make law. If the current court lets the previous rulings stand then fine. But if the court rules the previous decision was judicial activism and overreach and throws it back to the Federal and State legislatures then it should be simple to get a majority of representatives to codify the conclusions.

I could tell you about the wife of a co-worker that was 2 months pregnant when she was diagnosed with a brain tumor. The doctors told her the treatments would hurt the fetus and likely lead to its death. But to save her life they were necessary. But she refused treatment and her condition worsened. She carried the child and gave birth. But by then it was too late to address the tumor and she died a few months later. Now that's conviction to a belief and the ultimate sacrifice. So she saved the baby. But she also left her husband a widower and two other children motherless. So there's a lot of sides to the story and lessons to be learned from it. As there is to the stories of countless other women faced with specific circumstances. But I'm not sure even read my entire post. I ended my comment with I expect, somewhere in the middle (of the extreme polar views) is the answer and the position of most women, and dare I suggest men too. So why are you arguing with me? Because there's nothing to argue about. I'm merely laying out the positions at both extremes. They are what they are. Are you unwilling to accept there can be an acceptable middle ground consensus the majority of Americans can get behind?

Let's do one thing at a time here stay on topic. Am I right or am I wrong?

And that is why I don't understand all the fuss. If SCOTUS either overrules or modifies Roe v. Wade then Congress and State legislatures have the power and ability to pass legislation that can be signed by the President or Governors. And if anybody's got a gripe against a specific State then there's your lesson in democracy in action that lots of posters are pontificating about. Plus all the moral and ethical posturing with various scenarios is just avoiding stating what I think is obvious. And that is.. If somebody is advocating for abortion without any limitations or conditions then what they're really saying is they totally support the women's unconditional right to decide and they place no value on the life or potential life of the child. That's really it. And conversely, if they advocating "right to life" and no abortion without exception or condition they value the life of the child and prioritize this life above all personal, medical, or otherwise concerns or desires of the woman. That's really it. I expect, somewhere in the middle is the answer and the position of most women, and dare I suggest men too.

NBC news also reports US involvement in the sinking of the Moskva. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/us-intel-helped-ukraine-sink-russian-flagship-moskva-officials-say-rcna27559 Which I don't find at all surprising as I originally didn't believe the Ukrainian military had the ability and know-how to pull that off. My guess was US Intel and military did everything but push the button.

All I can say is standing up there day-after-day having to lie and cover for this inept President and his administration has got to take a toll on you mentally and physically. Maybe a couple jobs like professional horse inseminaor or porta-potty cleaner are worse. But then again they're pretty much the same thing. As the current assignment under Biden as WHPS is to screw the truth and pump out sheet.

And all I hear is from the green energy crowd is how solar panels and windmills are going to enable a future of endless prosperity and abundant and reliable renewable energy. Also a headline from today's stock markets: Sinko de Mayo. More good news for Joe. Expecting next accusations from the President's few remaining supporters that Jerome Powell is working for Putin too.

My dad used to say if don't have some degree of financial independence and your livelihood depends on the opinions and good graces of others you'll never have any real freedom. So keeping with that theme, I suspect Musk doesn't give a rat's ass what the NYT's writes or thinks.

I will do my best.

Up until Josh Allen and the current regime appeared on the scene I feared suffering the same fate but from all accounts this feels like it could be our year to win it all!

Now, no matter how big or small, everything is always a political issue. Although I have my opinion, personally, I've got no skin in the game here and the Roe v. Wade debate doesn't crack my top 10 concerns. However, I think its ironic with the timing of this debate that Sunday the 8th is Mother's Day. Unfortunately for me, my mom pasted away 6 years ago. But if anyone's mother is still alive and you're able to visit or call her please do so on Sunday. And maybe think about this debate and maybe get her views on the topic as I find social and political views through the process of different experiences tend to vary from generation to generation. Or perhaps thank her for deciding to carry you to term and raise you rather than deciding to abort you for her own reasons. Which led directly to you ability to interact, agree, or disagree with others here today.

Well, the US administration is perfectly comfortable engaging in a proxy war sacrificing lots of Ukrainians for as long as necessary to yank Russia's chain. And neo-con/neo-liberal war party member under-secretary of State Nuland, a former official in the Obama State department & foreign policy advisor to former VP Dick Chenny, is the architect and administrator over the effort.

You should ask Victoria Nuland over at the State department to explain. She was on point with Ukraine under Obama and now Biden. And although the media and government here force feed the public with the narrative of Ukraine as a fledgling democracy consistent with our ideals and customs in reality its been a system ruled by corruption and oligarchy control since the break-up of the Soviet Union.

You're one sick mofo..

You're crossing the line here inferring some comparison with a woman that was murdered by the police. Get help. You've got some serious issues.

I believe this is the mission statement of the board: Censor, block, dismiss, and discredit, any facts or opinions that disagree with or conflict with the official narratives the board was established to protect.

20 to 1 they'll be making an appearance on The View to a standing ovation and gushing from the show hosts and then a tour of the talk show circuit to be hailed as a "hero" for destroying confidence in one of the few institutions that Americans held in regard. With this "15 minutes of fame" to be followed up by several job offers at some activist think-tank. And as sure as the Sun rises and sets, in classic neo-liberal form, you can expect to hear about constant death threats and harrassment from fringe extremists which will instantaneously turn the perp into the victim.

Write down today's date. As another poster pointed out on the board here earlier today with abortion now front-and-center the left has suddenly become aware and capable of annunciating the definition of a "women". A biologically defined human being capable of becoming pregnant and childbirth. We're making progress!

SCOTUS has stated: Yesterday, a news organization published a copy of a draft opinion in a pending case. Justices circulate draft opinions internally as a routine and essential part of the Court’s confidential deliberative work. Although the document described in yesterday’s reports is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts. Jr., provided the following statement: To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way. We at the Court are blessed to have a workforce - permanent employees and law clerks alike - intensely loyal to the institution and dedicated to the rule of law. Court employees have an exemplary and important tradition of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the trust of the Court. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work here. I have directed the Marshal of the Court to launch an investigation into the source of the leak.

All these law clerks and assistants working for the justices are lawyers. The job requirements bound them to a standard of ethics and duty to the court and their profession. One of which is adhering to the rules of order defining the process of legal deliberations between the justices. Another is the process that law clerks do not publish or announce or reveal court rulings. A breach of trust and ethics and a violation of the rules of conduct between the Supreme Court justices and that individual may not result in legal action but will most certainly result in disbarment and firing. As for punishing people, how about Julian Assange? He just printed something too. But lots of people on the left that love Hillary and blame Assange for her loss in 2016 along with other government operatives that got exposed and embarrassed by that act of "printing something" have the desire to lock him up.

Not really an answer but I assume you think those dirty "insurrectionists" got what they deserve.

Funny. Let's remember your position on the use of excessive force by a police officer the next time an unarmed minority person gets shot by a cop during a routine traffic stop. Did they comply? And I can only expect you think the cop that killed George Floyd didn't use excessive force but rather acted within the law. Or is your view on the application of excessive force based on the beliefs of the victim? I'm guessing this.