All_Pro_Bills

While you're close here many of these corporations have adopted a system best described as "stakeholder capitalism". One definition is "a form of capitalism in which companies do not only optimize short-term profits for shareholders, but seek long term value creation, by taking into account the needs of all their stakeholders, and society at large."

It says we must be living in some computer generated Matrix-like nightmare and I'm formally requesting that the tech support team reboot the system.

If they need any 5 1/4" floppy disks I can dig through some boxes of old computer stuff that got packed away in the 80's.

Whether Allen is available or not, I'm thinking this is the perfect time for that effective running game a lot of posters have been calling for to show up.

What I want to know is how did Trump set up the giant space mirror in orbit around the Earth to focus the Sun on the wick and light it when the VP was close by? I'm sure the FBI is hot on the trail to answer that one..

The Bills need to show a credible rushing attack in order to dictate the play to the defense and make them respect or at least "think" that the coming play might be a run. But if you have no legitimate running game or make no attempt to establish one, it just makes life easy for the defense. The line can focus on rushing the passer and not worry about the run, the linebackers can focus on dropping into their zones or man coverage responsibilities, and in the secondary the safeties can play way off the LOS in coverage while the corners don't have to even think about run support. A big problem on Sunday was all the Jets defense had to worry about was covering the receivers and pressuring Allen. Add to that it was a day when the passing game wasn't at its best. Given the Jets have some good talent on their defense, making your offense by design one-dimensional, made it just way too simple and easy for them. You couldn't have given them a better approach to defend if they made it up by themselves for you.

Nobody can accuse these regressive drones of being free thinkers. They ignore what their senses and physical reality tell them in order to spout the collective fantasy they're told to believe. Its one reason why none of them are capable of an original thought. What I find most disingenuous and fake about them is the real truth is that deep down in their heart and mind they can't possibly believe the crap they speak is true. So what else can they really be but liars and cheats?

Mostly the left reflexively views police as a tool of systemic racial oppression unless they're committing acts of violence against conservative individuals or groups in which case they'll just fine with the violence part.

Along with reducing the number of police and law enforcement these cities also make it difficult for private citizens to protect themselves. In many cases citizens that perform acts of self-defense against criminals are scrutinized by prosecutors more than the perpetrator of the act. This two-step sorry ass act, limiting the amount of government provided protection while inhibiting citizens ability to protect themselves is simply brilliant!

No argument with that but the Vikings have a pretty good RB and a QB that's proficient at the short passing game along with a team that is fundamentally sound so is anyone going to be surprised if they game plan on offense to do exactly what the Packers and Jets executed the past two games? So if McD and Frazier come into the game with the same approach as the past two weeks against the Vikings on Sunday I'm going to be both puzzled and upset along with concluding that the learning curve is just too steep for these guys to handle. And the week after, what's the thinking on how Cleveland is going to come into the stadium? Whether its execution or scheme or something else they better show some improvement.

Another thing might be that everything this team did in the off season and up until the KC game was focused overcoming the Chiefs. And once Josh and the Bills beat Mahomes and the Chiefs in Week 6 the whole group just had a mental letdown like it was "clear sailing" to the SB. So maybe getting kicked in the privates yesterday might be what's needed to get their attention and play with that fire and enthusiasm they had leading into the bye week.

I can't blame her directly but I think the message is focus on football here. Limit the celebrity and public appearances. Cut way back on social media. Nobody needs to know what you're thinking and what you're doing. As you're play on the field opens the door to all these commercial opportunities they can disappear just as fast if you don't put up points and clean up the offense.

Maybe its because I live in a place surrounded by a lot of Jets fans but I always get nervous when the Bills play these guys. The games never works out the way I expect. Yesterday was obviously an example of that. This team looks like it's lost some of their swagger and energy since the win over the Chiefs. Beating the Chiefs was an obsession and everything they did in the off season was designed to beat KC. Everything early in the season was done with the objective of preparing for that game. Once that goal was accomplished the team had a collective letdown as Mission Accomplished. But that's just not the goal here, and they know it. Losing a carelessly and sloppy game against the Jets might be just the right medicine and provide the fuel for the needed attitude adjustment to re-focus on the real goal which is the Super Bowl. They need to come out guns blazin' on both sides of the ball next Sunday

McD and Frazier are going to point to "execution" issues when they speak on Monday. And in many ways, that's a valid argument. There were countless missed tackles, bad angles, and missed gap assignments from start to finish. But from a physical standpoint the base nickel can put you at a disadvantage against an offense going with a bigger personnel package. Especially when you miss so many tackles and run gap assignments. Allowing that final Jets drive to move 90 yards down the field was just unacceptable. Sure, the offense was putrid but at some time during the season and during the game your defense needs to step and take charge and they didn't do it here. The coaches better figure it out fast. With the Vikings and Browns on the schedule at home the next two weeks does anyone here expect those teams to do anything other than what the Packers and Jets have game planned against the Bills defense?

Like you I'll go about life just the same. But the entire end of democracy narrative is absurd. Citizens voting to express their displeasure with a sitting administration to elect opposition candidates is exactly what democracy is all about. This is how our system is supposed to work. What Biden with his vote for us or else fear mongering messaging and the Democrats are pissing and moaning about isn't an end of democracy but rather an end of their unchecked power derived from controlling both the executive and legislative branches of our government. That's just simply the price to pay for doing such a poor job.

Curiously the Household Survey reported a drop of 328K jobs in stark contrast to the Payroll numbers. This divergence has existed for several months. Along with a labor force participation rate of 62.2%. My guess is most of the "new" jobs are workers already employed that are taking on 2nd or 3rd part-time or "full-time" jobs because of increases in the cost of living and the impact those rising costs have on their households. Not new workers entered the labor force. Hardly a case for strength. The problem the Fed is having is they started way too late in the cycle to address rising inflation and while their aggressive hikes will eventually have an impact there is a significant time lag between the rate hikes and their impact. To say they're behind the curve is an understatement and when they realize they've gone too far it will be too late to avoid a disaster.

I'd says the debate isn't settled that its already sexualized. Not in the sense of some sexual act but by a demonstration of sexual identity. Why else are men dressing to masquerade as women unless they want to emulate or be seen as a women in that particular situation? As the opposite sex. If its not intended to demonstrate or show some sexual identity or purely for entertainment why exactly have they chosen to appear like a women rather than dress, for example, in a Chuckie-Cheese costume and get the same entertainment impact? Which is assuming the appearance of something you are not.

Can you honestly say you enjoy exhibitions of men masquerading as creepy and garish looking women?

I think the core problem with how conspiracies theories in general are started and grow wings is that certain facts or bits and pieces of information either conflict or contradict or don't fit the generally accepted or "official" version of an incident or event. And when brought up or questioned there is a refusal to address them intelligently. Rather than provide a reasonable explanation there is an effort by forces in control or dispensing the narrative to dismiss or refuse to address inconsistencies and contradictions with "the story". Along with this comes a "kill the messenger" attitude by officials and power toward anyone daring to question them or perform anything resembling a neutral investigation. Which creates an air of suspicion and a belief somebody is hiding something. In this case some wishful thinking type narrative that the attacker is a fringe right-wing MAGA nut job unknown to the victim seems like a real spin on the likely truth. But just what it all is really I have no idea, but neither does anyone else here.

The problem with your argument is, that as is typical of you, the comparison you present is not consistent with reality as you "cherry pick" examples of behavior. How about some photo ops of leftist looting stores and starting fires? Denying reality and causing chaos are the two basic pillars of your cult's ideology.

Don't you think it makes more sense for Republicans to encourage Democrats to abort all their children so over time the problems and chaos their policies are causing will be resolved through extinction?

The only thing missing from Biden's Ultra MAGA Extremist rant were the audio laugh tracks in the background. Indeed, what a mess.

I'm not seeing in the story where anyone actually signed anything. Can you please point that part out?

Nothing here such as discussing "various legal strategies" equates to criminal activity. All it does is frame the thought process of the legal team and generally you employ lawyers to interpret and navigate the legal process, not circumvent or break it. All a big nothing.

Dementia, Alzheimer's, other neurological or mental impairment issues. But you'll never get any of the establishment boot lickers to accept that here.