All_Pro_Bills

You simply cannot wrap your mind around the truth that perspective and opinion is relative to where you sit at the table.

What I simply love here is the irony. Like the US government under Biden considers critics to be dangerous extremists, the Iranian government also considers domestic critics to be dangerous extremists. So both the US and Iranian government don't want to be questioned and criticized and label them as domestic extremists. But the same commentators and political activists here in the US that hate domestic extremists and call them dangerous, absolutely love them when they cause problems for other governments. So are extremists good or bad?

Hoax. Hydroxychloroquine was discredited because of concerns about toxicity and safety, not efficacy. Even though the medication accounts for almost 25% of monthly prescriptions written and filled for the US inflammation market. The problem was big pharma couldn't fatten up on COVID at the taxpayers expense with a 10 cent treatment.

Sure it matters. If it didn't the administration would have no need to communicate that censorship directive. For the life of me I don't know why anyone is okay with the censorship and suppression of critical thinking and free expression of ideas, whatever their views and personal situation. And things like that disinformation czar nonsense. What the administration is saying is we no longer recognize your right of free expression and we will determine what is true and what is fact. And you will believe it. It is forbidden to question our truth. It is forbidden criticize our truth. It is forbidden to provide alternative opinions and facts that conflict with our truth. Critical thinking and logical theories or opinions are forbidden. Anyone that disagrees with, criticizes, or denies our truth is a denier, and an extremest. Deniers and extremists are a danger to the social good. They must not be allowed to "contaminate" or disrupt society with their thoughts which disagree with our truth. If and when we decide to change the truth or facts we will do so and you will believe those too. We will do all the thinking and you will obey, or else we will bring the full force of the security State down on you. Brought to you by Biden the fascist.

Zuckerberg admitted the administration is directing social media platforms such as Facebook to identify, block, and censor views they find objectionable. Did you miss that?

Maybe they're use the power of the Administrative and Security State to hatch a plot to kidnap a Democratic governor, or use fabricated intelligence to manufacture a collusion conspiracy with a foreign power, or use undercover agents and informants to incite a riot at the US Capitol?

Even with the injury list the Bills open as a 5.5 to 6 point favorite.

Democrats get 100% on the issue of recognizing biological males can menstruate. Here's what Google says "Having a period is not a feminine thing, and people of all genders menstruate, including non-binary people, a gender people and even plenty of men!" When push comes to shove, nobody believes this crap they're just afraid to tell the truth because the inquisition will burn them at the stake.

Trump is a fascist because that's what these idiots are conditioned to think. They are not critical or independent thinkers. They buy absolutely every story the government is selling, and they will never disagree with any official policy or position. You're engaging in a back-and-forth, give-and-take conversation with absolute ideologists that will never, ever yield one inch to your view. No matter how compelling your argument might be. Invoking logic and citing facts will not serve your cause against them. Don't be fooled into calling them liberals. They are anything but that.

In the legal system determination of a person's guilt or innocence is not based on what anyone "thinks". What people think is subjective. The legal system is objective. It's based on facts, evidence, testimony, and what can be proven and what cannot be proven. Otherwise, it's all opinion, nothing more or less. Guilt in the case of public opinion and how that's formed or believed is another matter. In the public opinion space, anyone can "think" anything they want,

Democratic mayors and other virtue signaling politicians are attacking governors sending asylum seekers to their "sanctuary" cities because it's for more acceptable then speaking the truth that they don't want these people in their city. In alignment with NIMBY and transferring all the costs of their virtue signaling policies to others, they'd be happier if they went somewhere else.

With a court appointed master charged with handling the documents, Garland will not be able to reveal specifics or comment on anything related to the documents leading into the mid-term elections. That's the concern.

You're one of maybe five people in the world that still believes the Russia collusion hoax. Trumps in your head 24/7. You need to move on from this obsession or start taking an anti-anxiety medication.

How do you know so much about getting away with crimes? Do you have some sort of expertise or training in the area? Are you a criminologist?

The one where our constitutional system's guiding principal of presumption of innocence is replaced by idiots like Mueller declaring if you can't prove you're innocent then you're guilty, of something.

I saw an interview and I believe the officials name was Lisa Belcastro where she stated Martha's Vineyard doesn't have the capabilities to handle 50 asylum seekers. But that point can be made in almost every city and town where the Feds are dumping thousands of migrants. I assume those jurisdictions are not allowed to complain or discuss the Federal governments immigrant logistics operation under some gag orders to keep quiet. Pissing and moaning about transit operations conducted by hostile State governors is another matter. Complain away here using all the standard social justice memes. Otherwise, the resources at the State and Federal level don't exist to address issues of homelessness and drug addiction faced by American citizens. Yet our government sees fit to dump more and more strain on a social safety net system that is already stressed and ineffective. It's the height of stupidity to continue to allow uncontrolled and unlimited large numbers of people into the country. A logical action would be to close the border for some period of time and tell people not to come here as they won't be let in. And use that break to sort things out rationally. But there's no chance of that with the Party of Chaos in charge. And when officials insist the border is "secure" (what exact definition of secure they're using we don't know) they sound like idiots and liars when clearly video and news of thousand streaming across the border unimpeded every day is available.

A 39% approval rating says your wrong.

FBI Concerned That If MAGA Doesn't Conduct A Terrorist Attack Soon They'll Have To Fake One https://babylonbee.com/news/fbi-concerned-that-if-maga-doesnt-conduct-a-terrorist-attack-soon-theyll-have-to-fake-one

Simply because America is unique as its both a country and a global empire. America the country is like other countries with elected representative government that serves the interests of the people and the country. But in reality, most of the representatives we elect to Washington serve the interests of the empire. The empire's objectives are simple. Maintain the current uni-polar order where the empire makes the rules and everybody else follows the rules. Address any threats to this order by whatever means are required. Countries that don't want to follow the rules are subject to political, economic, and military actions. As long as a country follows the rules it doesn't matter if its a democracy, a monarchy, or some form of an oppressive government as long as they serve the interests of the empire. While most think the empire derives its power from the military, its real power comes from the US dollar and its status as the world's reserve and trade settlement currency. And through this controls the "value" of money worldwide. When you control the value of money, you control the value of everything. Along with that it allows for the remarkable ability to run trillion dollar deficits and create billions at any whim while deflecting most of the harm and impact to others.

But I'm sure you're aware they are sending citizens charged with misdemeanor trespassing and other minor infractions to maximum security, held without bail while awaiting trial for almost 2 years, denied legal counsel and access to evidence against them, with some having medical care withheld, so the comparison is appropriate. They are what people like Amnesty International, in the business of identifying government misconduct around the world call political prisoners.

It was a deal with the Devil. The US consumer got everyday low prices at Walmart and the government created a market for buying US treasuries which funded deficit spending in exchange for enabling the strip mining thousands of small towns and cities across the country of businesses and jobs. Corporate America got to "globalize" their domestic operations by offshoring manufacturing to use cheap Chinese labor labor in exchange for sharing proprietary and business critical technologies and systems with the CCP. All in all a great deal until it wasn't.

What all these accusations and memoirs lack is a definitive ending and any sense of finality. They're all like a murder without a body. Because there are never any "real" victims or tangible harm. Otherwise, can anyone provide the names of all the Democratic officials and Trump enemies that got their homes raided, their phones and personal possessions seized, along with being harassed, charged, and unjustly convicted of something as a result of the DOJ being corrupted?

Everyone is getting older as a fundamental fact of life but as people do get older and gain experiences they view life and issues from a different perspective and generally that perspective is less idealistic and more practical.

That I believe is called a lack of objectivity. But history shows when any single political ideology captures and controls the popular national media allowing it to broadcast and disseminate political propaganda at will that tends to be the result.

When the Bills drafted Edmunds and he was advertised as a sideline-to-sideline LB with elite physical size and abilities I had a crazy idea the team would use him occasionally to match-up with those big and athletic TE's the defense never could never handle. At the time Gronkowski presented the biggest headache. And now its Kelce. But I was wrong. But my thought was get physical with Kelce by never giving him a free release from the LOS by putting Edmunds over him and cover him over the short and intermediate routes. At a minimum this might disrupt the timing between Mahomes and his star TE and cause the QB to throw to other options. Sub in another LB for the nickel CB with Edmunds more or less playing that nickel but covering the TE. Will it work? I can't say. Maybe not, but so far what they're doing hasn't worked well either and why not experiment on a couple plays?