
All_Pro_Bills
Community Member-
Posts
6,893 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills
-
So the guy that's running a family crime organization that took millions in payoffs from Chinese state run organizations & who knows who else, and while overseeing US policy under Obama stole US aid money for Ukraine is less corrupt than Trump? Unless the big guy is cutting you in for a slice of his 10% you might want to reconsider that assessment. This administration and this government are not your buddies and whatever they end up doing to screw people you see at the opposition, they're going to end up screwing you the exact same way too.
-
What peaks my curiosity is why a FISA warrant? This isn't some foreign intelligence operation. Where methods and procedures and personnel might be at risk. That doesn't apply here. Using the FISA court is unnecessary. Why not get a regular federal court warrant. Specifying the places to be searched and the items to be seized. Its a warrant to search the home of a former President allegedly for some documents removed from the White House. You use the FISA court when you want to hide or keep something out of the public domain. If everything is on the up-and-up what could you possibly want to hide here? Given the standing of the suspect wouldn't you want to be as transparent as possible? Especially if you've got the goods on the guy! Finally.. If there is sufficient probable cause that can be presented to a judge to issue a warrant go to a Federal court judge to get a warrant. Make it as clear to everyone this is legitimate. But I suspect the government wants as little disclosure as possible. Why would you want that if you've got the smoking gun?
-
But we're looking down at everyone from the high ground and have the advantage with an old, demented, tired, and ineffective fake President leading a corrupt and dysfunctional federal bureaucracy and Pentagon leadership that thinks the best way to fight the Russians and Chinese is by enlisting and deploying men wearing dresses and wigs! Yup, we've got 'em all right were we want them.
-
As Washington is intent on pissing away an infinite amount of money in as unaccountable a fashion as possible, why don't they just get it over with and apply for friggin' Statehood? Top 10 state by federal monies. California ($43.61 billion) Texas ($26.90 billion) Florida ($23.77 billion) New York ($22.06 billion) Virginia ($17.68 billion) Pennsylvania ($15.58 billion) Illinois ($13.18 billion) Ohio ($12.57 billion) North Carolina ($11.31 billion) Michigan ($10.84 billion)
-
But none of these clowns are concerned with the Biden's getting monetary payoffs documented in their own records from the CCP and stealing money from Ukraine while VP?
-
Beasley contributed a lot to the Bills success on offense the past few seasons. But its just business. What's changed is the loss of some performance with age and injuries. Combine that with a $7M cap hit and a new OC along with what looks like a commitment to put more speed on the field. Add in more potential touches for McKenzie plus rookies RB Cook and WR Shakir and there's just no room for a part-time 7M slot receiver on the decline in the room.
-
Global warming err Climate change HOAX
All_Pro_Bills replied to Very wide right's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I get what you're saying but if I captured the gas coming out of the tailpipe into an isolated vacuum container before it has an opportunity to contact the atmosphere isn't that container full of CO gas? -
Nowhere has the woke theme destroyed established franchises in entertainment more than it has in the Superhero space. Predictable re-packaging of familiar stories and characters replaced by social justice themed roles centered on "oppressed" groups that produce mind-numbing, boring, and self-absorbed characters and plots. Watching these shows and movies should be considered a form of capital punishment.
-
Global warming err Climate change HOAX
All_Pro_Bills replied to Very wide right's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
So people in charge of things not thinking it out all the way? What's in effect here is the "out of sight, out of mind" principal. Because moving some activity, in this case burning fossil fuels to power an EV, to a different point in the process does not eliminate the activity. An intelligent question to ask is how much different, objectively through measurement of CO & CO2 (its really carbon monoxide being produced through combustion and then the CO bonds with "free" oxygen" in the atmosphere to form CO2, correct?), is the carbon emission level from the power plant to power that vehicle than just using an ICE vehicle directly? None of the 97% of all scientists and "experts" getting paid to recite the climate change talking points appear ready to tackle that one. -
The fundamental problem is all these government edicts worldwide have negative impacts on productivity. Higher productivity, whether through the use of more efficient energy sources or improvements in technology or methods, are directly responsible for social and economic progress and improvements in the standard of living of everyone. If you lower productivity you are going to lower the standard of living. Democracy aside, the only way you sell that to people aware of that linkage between these actions and lowering their standard of living is through force. How much force are these governments willing to exert? And what happens when the force against these initiatives is greater than the force the government can exert? A lot of bad stuff can happen. Because what they're pushing is a lower standard of living for everyone, everyone of course but themselves, the other political elite, and the ultra-wealthy. A return to Medieval feudalism and an end to democracy, When the light bulb comes on in the heads of the majority of populations around the world and they see their personal situation getting worse, and they decide my government is not my boss, there are going to be a lot of ex-leaders and their political cronies hanging upside down from lampposts.
-
They just can't say sexually promiscuous gay men are at the highest risk of contracting and spreading monkey pox. And avoiding that behavior, at least for a limited duration of time, is the best method to avoid the virus. We don't need experts to know this, just a little common sense and observation of reality. The thing is, we can say it, think it, and know it. Which makes the experts look like idiots while they play their game of make-believe science driven by political science.
-
More worrisome is that you must be watching Fox News. Don't let your friends know! Sounds to me like Fox News is quoting me and not the other way around. But perhaps you can enlighten us and explain the methodology behind the production of the BLS monthly jobs numbers? The small business birth/death model, the assumptions and variables. The distinction between full and part-time jobs. Adjustments and revisions to previous months. Just the basics.
-
An interesting report. Over 500K jobs and wage growth of 5.2% Y/Y. That signals the Federal Reserve is nowhere near done with rate increases. And suggests despite negative GDP, hiring is still robust. All of which are bringing markets down pre-open. What's curious is the jobs report is in conflict with almost every other indicator of the job market which all suggest hiring has already rolled over. A huge divergence with the plummeting household survey numbers, falling job opening, increasing layoff announcements, all pointing down.
-
These media outlets manufacture stories and cite "anonymous" sources to give it an air of legitimacy. How do you verify an anonymous source if its anonymous? Well you don''t All you can do is take the word of the reporter of the story. Which other like-minded media outlets do to provide legitimacy. Then additional media outlets carry the story that for example, cite the Times story provided by anonymous sources. As proof the story is legitimate. Which then gets picked up by other outlets in a self-confirming loop of credibility. The public perception of the validity of the story is established and its now fact. A manufactured fact. That grows to become the lead story on ABC news tonight. "This just in, more revelations about misconduct inside the administration", states the news anchor with a hint of urgency. What then happens is every single person connected to the actual event or situation states the story is false or misrepresents the actual facts or events. But the damage is done. And since the source is fake there's never any action or need to uncover a "source" of sensitive of national security or privileged information. Because the story's fake there's nobody to identify. It's one very effective way the media disseminates and broadcast propaganda.