
All_Pro_Bills
Community Member-
Posts
6,893 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills
-
Not anymore. After 8 years of war in the East, they're all dead, or wounded, or prisoners of war. But the Ukrainian Nazi movement, its history of WW2 collaboration with Hitler's SS, and current day presence, is an interesting topic. Something people that claim American white supremists lurking behind every bush and tree is the greatest domestic terror threat would like to ignore. If you want to experience real terror, I suggest riding the NYC subway system.
-
The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:
All_Pro_Bills replied to Deranged Rhino's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
If memory serves me correctly, it was way back in 2016 that Democrats didn't trust elections. And then spent 4 years obstructing and sabotaging the administration. Along with creating all sorts of imaginary collusion stories and relationships. Most of which were investigated with great zest only to yield nothing. Perhaps Liam's memory is just not so good? Maybe the moral here is if you punch somebody in the face don't cry that they punch you back. -
Russia Was Not a Democratic Hoax
All_Pro_Bills replied to WEATHER DOT COM's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
All documents related to the Russia collusion story should be declassified and released. Not just one memo. We should know the facts and the truth. Nothing should be hidden. If anyone broke the law here in any respect, they should be prosecuted. No exceptions. But what I conclude is that the government has no interest in transparency or providing the public with all the facts. if DOJ and the Intelligence Community thought any or all of the documents and communications related to the Russia collusion story could implicate Trump, they would have released them already. To the contrary to seeking transparency and disclosure, the FBI conducted a raid authorized by Garland targeting the retrieval of any Russia election collusion story documents because they feared they'd be released to the public. And possibly used by Trump's legal team in his lawsuit against Hillary on charges of manufacturing the story. I expect they'll continue to hide behind the usual national security and method and procedures excuses for withholding the truth from the people they're supposed to serve. Regardless of the outcome, we should all agree, the government should release everything so once and for all we can all know the truth. And in the specific memo above, I say release it. -
Sure they're out to get Trump. He's an outsider that seeks to put the needs of America the country above the needs of the establishment and their global empire which has a different set of objectives than a nation state republic. Unfortunately, you're attempting to discuss and debate the virtues of democracy and the actions of the establishment with a lot of posters that believe a grand conspiracy exists to install Orange Hitler as supreme ruler of the United States. Assisted by hordes of zealots and cult members intent on raising their "leader" to dictator while obeying and carrying out every command he secretly issues to incite violence and oppress and harass anyone that dares to resist this crusade and its objective. To stop at nothing to destroy democracy. But its all an illusion. Created by people in power that wish to remain in power that can only remain in power though the use of deception and propaganda. People that are scared to death of the coming mid-terms.
-
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
At least she walked about with a higher net worth. All the chumps here licking the boots of every government official and authoritarian directive should be happy. An extra $37 Million in 6 years of patriotic service in support of "democracy". Sweet hustle and con, right? That tells me we're all in the wrong line of work. -
Global warming err Climate change HOAX
All_Pro_Bills replied to Very wide right's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You should read "The Long Emergency". Its about the coming end of the oil age and the resulting social, political, and economic implications. Not to spoil the story but the author reached similar conclusion as you. Until civilization develops and identifies a more efficient and productive source of energy, nuclear power is the best option to bridge the gap in time until that happens. But since Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011 nuclear power plants have been under scrutiny. Many of the reasons well justified. And spent fuel rod processing and disposal is always a problem. But as a society we've let 30+ years pass without addressing this potential solution. And counter to this approach, countries like Germany have taken steps to decommission their nuclear power plants and putting their fate in the hands of renewables like solar and wind. Designing, permitting, constructing, and commissioning nuclear power plants is a decade, plus, long effort. Likely longer given current regulatory and social obstacles. Another issue is the US has little to no current Uranium production. If we started now this solution might be able to be deployed around 2040 or 45. I don't see this happening. It would require a massive investment and a quantum shift in policy away from renewables and deploying most of that committed capital and effort to nuclear. It would be a politically unpopular proposal given the current administration. Unfortunately, none of this is likely until 2024 at the earliest, and people generally need to experience an emergency or a disaster before they get moving on something. So expect that first. -
Are Republicans pro-terror?
All_Pro_Bills replied to SectionC3's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I think you're on to something here. Maybe not the way you think or I approached it before. This might be the core reason for Trump Derangement Syndrome? The left doesn't hate Trump because of his policies, positions, or what he says or doesn't say. They hate him because he beats them at their own game. He out-victims the victims. He never says those two words they demand to hear from any sinner. Which is "I'm sorry"or "I apologize". The fact they can't play their Jedi mind trick victim game against him because he's better at it than they are just enrages the cult. It throws their already irrational mind to higher levels of irrationality and anger. I mean, look at the victim chart. For the left its absolutely impossible for a white heterosexual male to be a victim, ever. It drives them bonkers that he gets away with it. It's that simple! -
Are Republicans pro-terror?
All_Pro_Bills replied to SectionC3's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Because woke ideology has transformed the practice of playing the victim into an art form. And there is no entry on the victim hierarchy chart under the victim column for "right wing". If these people get threatened and harassed or attacked violently, well as an official oppressor they deserve it. That's how it works. Anyone raises any criticism against a leftist and they happen to fall into the oppressor column then they're a terrorist. And a bigot. And threatening violence. Against a perpetual victim, no matter what they do or don't do. Those are the rules. -
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Just as Catholics can absolve themselves of sins through the practice of confession conservatives can absolve themselves from transgressions as defined by the neo-liberal cult ideology by condemning and rejecting Trump. But like confession, the forgiveness is temporary as both processes require repeated episodes of absolution. -
I missed out on all of this growing up. Unlike Joe, my father didn't approve of drugs and hookers. He would likely suggest if you've got a "void" sign up for Marine Corp for a couple years and that will straighten you out real quick.
-
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I could raise the same challenge to every poster here. But based on what. And to what end? How does anyone know anything? Through some verifiable source that contradicts something they said? Through vast personal or professional knowledge of some subject? Or simply through the idea that one poster disagrees with what another poster states? We're mostly here to express our views and opinions. And exchange them with other posters that might agree or disagree with our views. We're not here to exchange facts and figures vetted by sanctioned or official sources that claim to know everything. They don't know everything. And in my opinion there aren't a lot of critical thinkers among them. If they were critical and logical thinkers they wouldn't be working as fact checker drones. They might be producing clear and articulate ideas of their own mind. Given that isn't happening most sanctioned and official sources are also opinions. And the official story somebody tells them to follow. So if you don't like my opinion that's fine and good. But that doesn't mean my opinions and conclusions are wrong. Or that your are wrong. It just means you disagree. And if you provide no counter argument there's no opportunity to entertain other viewpoints. -
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Can you be any less specific? -
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Liz also said to NBC: "I have said since Jan. 6 that I will do whatever it takes to ensure Donald Trump is never again anywhere near the Oval Office and I mean it". So in a real moment of honesty she admitted the true purpose of the 1/6 Committee. She said it loud and clear. It's not to investigate the events and actions that took place on that day at the Capitol. Its to "get" Trump. The thing is, criminal investigators investigate crimes. They don't investigate people. But Liz just admitted 1/6 is just that. An investigation of a specific person in search of a crime for the purpose of destroying one person's political career. And they wonder why Congress has an approval rating of 17%. Are you saying supporting Trump is a crime? -
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Great. I'm thinking of my Swedish friend Gustav's 20 year old twin sisters but nothing's going to happen here either. -
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Chump serving your masters.. -
Liz Cheney Political Career Post Mortem
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Liz's positions are predicated on personal interests. Nothing more complicated than her family are members of the uni-party establishment that rules Washington. This establishment includes elected officials, appointments, lifetime bureaucrats in defense and intelligence, state, and other agencies along with various well funded think tanks, endowments, lobbyist, and rich beneficiaries of the system. If you devote some time to research and examine the inter-personal relationships among and between this political class it will produce some mind-altering revelations and change the way you view and think about things. Is all akin to a royal court setting from old European days of Kings and Queens. If you're a commoner like me you're on the outside looking in. There three things they want from you, 1) your obedience to their rule, 2) your income to fund their existence, 3) your sons and daughters to fight and die in the for-profit wars they wage. Its all something the chumps that carry water for the government here don't or won't comprehend. To think that one party or the other has your interests in mind is an illusion. -
Convicted felon Donald Trump's follies
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillStime's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Liz will be just fine. A month or so after her term expires she'll be appointed to the board of directors of some defense contractor or neocon think tank while she bides her time until she resurfaces for the next election cycle. -
You're a liar but you'll make an excellent propagandist for the Empire. Exactly how many people have Trump's followers killed? So yeah sure, how many? How many people have US government interventions along with direct and indirect support for foreign wars killed? Iraq, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Yemen to name several. How many millions have suffered and been displaced from the homes?
-
While this argument has some legal basis it is also a larger matter of judgement. And how the application of judgment may or may not affect actions or intentions. Like executing a broadly scoped search warrant instead of issuing a subpoena for the documents in question. Or allowing the legal team to observe the search to eliminate specific challenges to the search or allegations of misconduct. Garland, acknowledging a conflict of interest or a being aware of the perception of a conflict of interest, should appoint an outside special counsel, with no apparent ties or bias towards the DOJ case or a Trump defense, to oversee the case. Without this, my guess is the defense will continually hammer away that regardless of the circumstances, evidence, and facts, the entire process and potential outcomes are tainted by a compromised AG doing the work his boss (President Biden who has gone on record saying Trump should be prosecuted) ordered to take out his most likely rival for the 2024 Presidential election.
-
It would be rather simple to redact names and protect the identity of any witness and still release the affidavit to provide clarity around the justification and rationale behind the warrant. Such a high profile case demands more transparency given all the rumors and theories being generated. I could start with the magistrate. He steps down from his judicial position in order to take the job of defense attorney for a couple defendants in the Epstein case. Once that is over he's reinstated to his position. The Trump vs. Clinton civil case is assigned to him. But back in June he suddenly recuses himself from the case for reasons I'm not aware of and resurfaces last week as the magistrate issuing the warrant for the search and seizure operation against Trump. So an obscure and rather insignificant magistrate in Florida is involved in three high profile cases. Perhaps just a coincidence? Perhaps not. What I find most interesting is how so few appear to be the least bit curious about all of these events that when combined weave an interesting picture where somebody could easily conclude Reinhart is some kind of political "cleaner" that's called into action when somebody makes a mess of things.