All_Pro_Bills

Another major insight. If every person attending the WEF would shove their head up a cow's ass they could make a positive impact on methane gas emissions and save the planet.

It's more a theory than a hypothesis. Take a poster that never, ever criticizes or objects to any democratic position or action and conclude (all other variables equal) they won't criticize a bad actor of the other party if the only variable you change is he belonged to the party of people they won't criticize. Its an assumption that has a high probability of being true based on available historical data. So yeah, let's say I'm 99.9% true as no system or process has a 0 error rate. But my point is still valid.

What's utterly hilarious and ironic is if Trump actually dressed in this manner all the progressives and lefties would overwhelmingly support him as one of their kind of weirdos.

I'm 100% certain that if Santos was a democrat you'd be defending the guy so pointing fingers at others is disingenuous. You know it, we all know it.

I knew you'd bite the big one on this comment of mine. I got you on a string. So dance puppet. But then again, you're the one cheer leading violence and war in Europe where the common citizen and soldier is put in harms way. And if war isn't terrorism then what is it? Perhaps just a game for your amusement? All I'm suggesting is it would be a much better world if a handful of scumbag billionaires that pay no taxes, exploit the common working person, and rape the planet would disappear. Rather than having to listen to these pompous douches tout their superiority, insisting they are best suited to rule over all, and demanding that everybody else should make due with less. All while they live it up at the WEF with lots of great meals, entertainment, boring speakers, and free prostitutes. Only somebody on the payroll would defend these characters.

Sure we can agree. Which is more prevalent? I can't say I know off the top of my head. I suggest a distinction. There's no social movement that will attack anyone that doesn't embrace and accept the practice of in-cest (why is that word forbidden to be used here?). And obviously for most of us its something that should not be acceptable. Nor are there any groups I know of advocating for the practice. But there are plenty of people, groups, and organizations willing to attack and attempt to ruin your life if you speak out or don't go along with gender identification word games because you're inciting violence against victims for what is a pure mental issue on their part. The most troubling aspect of the gender identity obsession is why people that claim to be intellectually superior to the rubes and hillbillies believe something that is provably false?

Let's cut to the chase. Find a biological human male, or any other animal species for that matter, that menstruates and normalize these weirdo concepts for all the non-believers.

Its a real-life situation comedy that should be put out of its misery by dropping one big bomb on the meeting. Maybe at the point where Dr. Evil gives his closing comments?

Do some research. Start with super nazi klaus the head of the forum touting "master the future" and work your way down.

Just rumors of the gathering being composed of elites the authoritarian left are in love with pontificating on how their collective leadership and wisdom will save the world from things like climate change as they demonstrate their concern and commitment to solutions by flying 1000's of private jets filling the atmosphere with millions of tons of CO2 to the event. Some would call it hypocrisy although I would say arrogance is more appropriate.

Have you seen stories such as the NYT's report on how these weapons transfers are starting to impact the US military's preparedness levels? Drawing down stockpiles to the point where inventory in strategic areas of potential conflict are being depleted. Drawing down military hardware inventory in places like Israel and South Korea. Being used up faster than they can be replaced and straining supplies of key and scarce inputs. To the point where military leaders and Pentagon planners are raising concerns that draw downs are putting direct U.S. interests and US forces at risk. I expect a news outlet such as The Times publishing such a report signals were approaching some policy tipping point. I believe the implication is that like all recent wars and conflicts our government gets involved in they will sooner rather than later shift focus elsewhere or no longer view helping Ukraine as a key interest. And hang them out to dry, aka Afghanistan. Then suddenly all the people shouting to the rafters about the need to provide unlimited support for democracy will immediately alter their opinions and support the establishments change of heart and direction. Most likely shifting the task completely onto our European "partners" and when that strategy flops placing the blame for failure on them.

Liberals following the science. Anyone that disagrees is an appliance denier.

Really? OK Sandra, show me a biological male that menstruates.

Those Africans were free until various African kingdoms and tribes captured members of other tribes and kingdoms and sold them into slavery for profit and material gain. The captives were sold to Arab slave traders moving slaves to Middle Eastern and other Old World markets. This practice was in place for hundreds of years until Europeans, initially Portuguese merchants, established settlements on the west coast of Africa. At that point the New World slave trade was established. The first slave holders were running plantations in Brazil/South America and the Caribbean. The practice later established itself in the American colonies and what became the United States.

49K! Yikes. If I was a suspicious and thorough criminal investigator following every lead I'd wonder if that was some kind of money laundering payment from the Biden influence peddling operation documented by the contents of the laptop and fronted by Hunter to his dad? But sadly, I'm merely a crazed conspiracy theorist looking to discredit an "honest politician". Two words that should never be used together. I should also apologize to any self-proclaimed progressive types as humor, in particular, satire, is both undesirable and dangerous to them.

With "Top Secret Please Do Not Look" written on the cover with a sharpie! Don't worry. We've got special counsel Robert Hur on the job. A guy that worked on the Russia Hoax with Mueller. I'm sure he's give the job his all.

I have no issue with people coming into the country but pay your own way. But the current administration thinks otherwise. They dangle dozens of "free" support and assistance programs providing all kinds of no cost services to people in need and then we're all left to wonder why they're flocking by the millions to come into the country. And at the same time they claim the cupboard is bare when American's need help.

Truthfully, almost everyone lies about supporting and believing those "woke things". They lie to keep their jobs, get along, and go along with the crowd. Look no further than Hollywood as a clear example. You want to work and remain relevant, you go along. Focusing on things like proper pronouns? Laughable and frivolous for anyone dealing with real life struggles. Pretending to believe in Woke is the modern day rendition of the Emperors New Clothes.

With 3 back ups on the offensive line, I would hope Frazier/McDermott will devise a game plan that will create some confusion among players that aren't very familiar playing as a group. And speed up the clock in Burrow's mind with real pressure or affecting his pre-snap reads. Some equivalency of Pittsburg's zone blitz scheme where a free rusher could be coming from anywhere. But I might be asking too much.

An opportunity for an all-expenses paid meet and great with his bosses?

The FBI has simply redirected their same old tactics and play book to a different target audience. Instead of racists they employ progressives. Same type of bigots.

The Bills offensive approach is high risk, high reward. And suddenly Allen seems to have lost the ability to pick the right spots to take the risky play. I hate to use the word "problem" because even with all the turnovers and execution miscues, they still managed to put up 34 points. I'm speculating here because I don't personally know either person, but to me the concern is the impact Dorsey is having on Josh. Not just from a play calling standpoint but from an emotional and mental view in game preparation and play. Dorsey by all observations is an emotional person. Do you want your OC to be more jacked-up emotionally than your QB? I think the difference between last year's Josh and this year's Josh is Daboll was an anchor keeping Josh level and focused while Dosey is a balloon lifting him off to a point where emotion takes over thinking.

And when they became less useful, he had them all shot and executed. Lest them become somebody else's useful idiots at some later time. Today's activists and idealists should pay attention to that eventuality.

Trump is no genius but it would be nice for all these generals that everyone is constantly gushing over to win a war every once in a while. When's the last clear victory, 1945? Unless you want to count that major dust up in Grenada under Reagan. $800B annually. That stinks of gross incompetence.

Un-elected civil servants and appointees at the FBI defining and executing actions against private citizens or selected targets of their choosing, outside the required laws and statutes governing the scope of the organizations charter and mission is dangerous. And blatantly illegal. Why anyone would choose to ignore or accept this is mind boggling. Who knows, anyone could be their next target, maybe even you if they so desire?