All_Pro_Bills

Whatever the Biden administration's plan is, given thier perfect record, its 100% guaranteed to fail.

If racism doesn't work then blame feminism.

Banning Tik Toc would be a backdoor precident for The State to ban other sites they deem "dangerous" in the future.

Do you question the validity of the statistics or the methodology, or the conclusions of that media study?

Well I'm just making a comment on identify politics in order to highlight the subjective nature of the entire charade. But while I'm here, could you supply the exact body count year-to-date for this militia war against the government?

The Chaos theory has credibility. And for fun, let's say I identify with being a 16th century Caribbean pirate. I've adopted the customs, dress, and mannerisms, activities, and other traits of a pirate of that era. I've even reached out to other people sharing a similar belief in themselves. We've established formal and informal crews and events. Do things together that pirates do. Does that make me a "real" 16th century Caribbean pirate or just some nutjob masquerading and thinking he's a pirate? Objectively I am a 21 century American nutjob but using the criteria adopted by so called activists the answer must be an unequivocal "yes"!

I think your view on these social issues comes down to whether you generally see something through the lens of objectively or subjectively.

Its debatable whether trans surgery is a treatment solution or exploitation by the medical an social justice communities when it comes to dealing with children. Along with disclosure of all potential mental and physical risks (like buyers remorse many experience) and the necessary patient consent.

One thing Mexican officials know how to do is easily spot official government corruption and President Biden's expertise at avoiding direct involvement by directing payoffs from foreign entities to family members would have made him one hell of an outstanding corrupt Mexican official.

Yup, inner city gang members are known to be receptive to therapy. Best of luck to all the social workers and counselors of Chicago. This is all definitely going to work, guaranteed.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr on Wednesday filed a statement of candidacy with the Federal Election Commission, positioning him to oppose President Biden for the 2024 Democratic nomination. In the past he's stated. "My top priority [would] be to end the corrupt merger between state and corporate power that has ruined our economy, shattered the middle class, polluted our landscapes and waters, poisoned our children, and robbed us of our values and freedoms." Personally, for me, sounds like I guy I will give some consideration. But for the establishment? Another populist type threat. So release the hounds in the mainstream media and let attacks begin!

That FBI team has a lot of expertise running entrapment operations. Something which the agency and the political figures they protect highly value. But we have to remember that "nobody is above the law". How many times have we heard some clowns say that one? 🤣

It's suspected that Susan Rice is Obama's inside contact. She's got a fancy title as Domestic Policy Advisor in the Biden White House. But there's close to zero information on what she does and little to nothing publicized as policy. The media never mentions her name and there's little to no PR. I expect she directs the ex-Prez's agenda from the inside. It seems implausible Washington insiders are oblivious to this arrangement.

Biden also drained the SPR and Saudi Arabia has rebuffed US interests while transitioned to an ally of China on his watch. Along with this, OPEC+ is consistently ignoring US interests. To this point its indisputable that this administration's energy policy is a failure. And things are going to get much worse.

That's going to be another hoot. At this point the Democratic leadership is so crooked they automatically assume everybody operates and thinks like them and is out running some hustle or con. Its projection at its finest.

Unfortunately better qualified students are going to suffer because of admission standards and practices favoring less qualified candidates for whatever reason they want to give. But all this is going to be self-correcting over time. Action and reaction along with consequences. Because schools like Ivy League universities are only destroying their brand by lowering the admission standards for specific demographics because as the quality of students is diluted so will the value of the credentials they market to students wanting to attend their institution. Don't be surprised when there's moaning and groaning about the need to lower expectations of student performance. A "C" score today will be considered an "A" grade in the immediate future. With exclusivity, excellence, and merit removed from their brand it becomes just another commodity. And once realizing the prestige applied to an Ivy league degree no longer exists why would parents and students want to pay premium tuition costs for mediocrity?

The thing is, attempting to influence an election is what its all about. Because all candidates and their campaigns by the nature of the political process, operate with the purpose of influencing the outcome of the election. Either things they do, or do not do. This is how it works. Otherwise, an NDA is not illegal. And making payments per the NDA terms and conditions is not illegal and no campaign money was involved.. And not revealing the terms and conditions or contents of the NDA is not illegal. Revealing it would defeat the purpose of the agreement. And there are rights to privacy affording citizens like the 4th Amendment. As for testimony on delaying payments. Is there some directive in writing? Or is the delay documented as part of the NDA agreement? Because generally, "he said that he said" 2nd or 3rd hand type testimony can pass muster in grand jury actions where prosecutors charges are typically approved by the grand jury but in criminal court legally regarded as hearsay. If Bragg wants to find somebody looking to influence an election, then he should look in the mirror. But we all already know that's the game here. Or maybe arrest the 51 former intelligence community members that influenced the 2020 election when they lied about the origins of the Hunter Biden laptop being Russian disinformation when they (and the FBI) knew the truth that it was authentic. Nobody's doing time for that one.

Good luck proving that. The problem for the DA is the payment had nothing to do with the campaign. It was of a personal nature, wasn't campaign money, and would have been made absent the election regardless. Such as not wanting his wife to know which is common in these situations.

What's the "crime" in the indictment cited as being covered up? I don't see it. The DA's case is pure fantasy.

But there needs to be a prerequisite conviction for the predicate offense or the State would need to have jurisdiction to prosecute such an offense. Neither appears true to this point. The State must reveal what is the criminal conviction is being covered up? Otherwise, the falsifying business records to cover up another crime conviction has no merit because there is no other crime to cover up. What am I missing?

Each count of the indictment states (bolding is mine & generic date): THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE , in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about <date>, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, etc.. I guess the key question is what other crime?

And exactly when does AG Garland either start or appoint a special counsel for that investigation of President Biden & family? Like when Hell freezes over?

But while there are good intentions at work here for "better treatment" its characterized by "equity" as "privilege". Just in the opposite direction as the historical preferential treatment/privilege argument social justice types rally against when it comes to whites. It all seems like revenge.

The alternative is potential for voter fraud and I'd suggest that either side is more than willing to look the other way if it means victory. That leaves a need for some agreement that meets the requirements for voter authentication and guaranteeing every citizen's right to cast a ballot while removing the biases inherent in the political process. But given the current polarized environment that is proving difficult absent some extreme prodding from citizen groups interested in the process of fairness and democratic principals. Sadly, reading my own words leaves me feeling like a delusional idealist longing for reasonable thinking given the current climate.

Only if you consider some form of voter identification which is consistent with identity verification methods used in every day personal transactions to be difficult. Yet a majority of Americans polled representing Democrats, Republicans, and Independents believe this is reasonable yet resistance among a loud minority of leaders and citizens block efforts. Because its.... (wait for it...) Racist! The excuse of the times we live in for everything that can't be defended by logic and reason.