All_Pro_Bills

And repeat the same words over and over. HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE, HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE,HATE Repeat it until it sticks. Because civil and peaceful disagreement and expressing your views is not allowed when focused on the movements Alpha victim.

I will say that about Trump. And I've stated many times he lacks moral and ethical character. And he lacks detailed comprehension of issues. He's a goofball. And I didn't vote for him in either election. And the audio tape where he discusses (and is assumed to be holding some confidential document) the contents of a confidential folder with other people without any security clearance makes him sound like an idiot and damages his claims of innocence. I've also given the idea of "proof" some overnight thought. And I've concluded in politics "proof" is irrelevant. While we debate back and forth about numerous issues the reality of politics is you don't need evidence. All you need is the ability to convince enough voters that your story is credible enough so they vote for you. All you need is to convince people to support your programs and not to support the other person's programs. That's the game these people play in Washington. That's the game the political parties play. Nobody in politics needed to prove Trump colluded with Russia. They just needed to get voters to believe the story and vote against him. They put on a big dog-and-pony show n order to create this illusion even though they knew the possibility of the Senate convicting Trump was zero. enough people fell for the story and Biden replaced Trump in the WH. Mission accomplished. Nobody in politics needs to prove Biden took payoffs using his son as the front man. They just need to convince the public the story is credible, which shows up in the President's polling number, which gives the DNC anxiety about running Biden for re-election, which damages his re-election chances. In this regard Comer is playing the role of Schiff. Meanwhile, we all wait for some release of information from the committee which backs up their assertions. But acquiring enough evidence to bring articles of impeachment is unimportant. What they do is manipulate perception of reality in order to get people to think and do what they want them to think and do. Providing the public with enough facts and figures and proof and evidence to make informed and rational decisions is the last thing they want. Which is where the censorship and misinformation project slides into the story which I won't go into here.

You're recycling the same old tired ass argument here. Oh, woe, there's no proof. I'll tell you what I think. I think you excel at this back-and-forth stuff but you're never going to waiver from your position. I don't think proof matters to you one way or the other. I think somebody could lay out a 25- page trail of evidence and proof and it wouldn't matter. Such as some bloggers are in the process of creating. You won't change your mind or alter your position. You'll never admit Biden is engaged in a lifetime payoff and influence peddling racket. There are whistle blowers, forensic accounting, and other people involved in the scams providing statements and documentation. But they're all lying. Everyone here is lying except the Biden's. You'll never waver one inch from your position on any other topic. So what's the point of anyone wasting their time responding and providing "proof"?

Okay drama queen. Are you going to recommend we all need to be on alert for soccer mom hate groups establishing concentration camp?

Do you acknowledge there was armed conflict between ethnic Ukrainian militias and Russian seperatists in Donbas beginning in 2014 until the invasion? Resulting in about 10,000 deaths.

I assume if instead they quoted Mao from the Cultural Revolution where the exact strategy was also employed rather than receiving push back they would have been cheered and commended for a job well done!

Aren't you the least bit skeptical about these types of reports? Maybe it was stray anti-aircraft fire that missed the target landed elsewhere.

All this what I'm saying here sounds like a conspiracy theory or rather it might be pure speculation and I'm just rattling off random thoughts here. But I think they've gotten into bed with other powerful forces like the surveillance and intelligence services (along with WEF-like groups), and assorted billionaires, and globalist type organizations and have agreed to do all the "dirty work" in exchange the big boys bankrolling their efforts and agreeing to add some of their more extreme desires to the program. I don't believe the IC is going to allow the left to take over anything. They're just street muscle to get the job done so they can keep their hands clean and stay out of the light. Nobody can convince me that billionaires like Larry Fink at Blackrock or George Soros that are bankrolling ideas like lenient prosecutors, stakeholder capitalism, and all sorts of social justice mambo jumbo are looking to institute a system of socialism or communism where guys like them will get their assets confiscated. Pure baloney. They've got some other motives and it's not Intersectional Equity and Inclusion or a desire to see dudes wearing wigs and dresses. I mean you see the same groups of demonstrators at the same types of events coast-to-coast spouting the same exact jargon and it costs a lot of money to move people around support an army of paid activists. But I think once the elites gain what control they seek they'll line up the leftist against the firing squad wall and eliminate the troublemakers like the way the Brown Shirts got snuffed in the Night of the Long Knives.

Absolutely. It's funny because this morning I was thinking of that slogan in the context of the current social debate on children. People took that motto incorrectly, and I was one of them. It implied the community would be supporting parents. But the authors of the slogan and the idea meant "The State" would be replacing parents and assuming the role of guiding and managing their upbringing. "It takes a village" clearly means communism (or the Nazi's did the same thing, take your pick) rather than assistance. The communist/socialist gig is always about concentrating power in a central authority in a command and control organizational structure. Its why you know the libs are full of crap when they feign ignorance that everything they say and do is scripted and generated from the top on down. Everything.

I'm not sure what reality you exist in but in my reality parents have a right to defend and protect their children from whatever they choose. And its a shame that whenever people attempt to express their rights through democracy and peaceful means the usual power groups immediately attempt to shout them down. Maybe its because these powerful and connected organizations are so used to getting their way for so long without any resistance that they forgot how to form an intelligent argument and are left to shouting simplistic slogans and words.

The SPLC is also warning the NHL draft tomorrow night is a racist white supremacist gathering.

I expect this leak was approved by the AG. If I'm a defense attorney I'd demand the DOJ identify the leaker and arrest the reporter and compel them to reveal their source. Do this under the Espionage Act which I believe is what they got Julian Assuage on for receiving and publishing "stolen" secrets. Same thing. Sadly, the truth is government officials don't mind leaking out a secret or two every now and then if it helps further their objectives and they have no more respect for the confidentiality of information than they accuse Trump of here. But expecting the keepers of the law to arrest themselves for breaking the law is asking too much.

I believe it was Patrick Henry that said "give me Liberty or give me Interectional Inclusion".

I agree. His views are intentionally mis-represented. Because he asks questions that a lot of powerful interests don't want answered. One thing he briefly discussed with Maher was Autism. He didn't say Autism is caused by vaccines. He said we don't know but that doesn't mean we should dismiss the possibility. He cited studies he said were flawed. And said he's provided clear evidence of this for each and every one. He said when he was growing up the rate was 1 child in 10,000 and today its around 1 child in 34. Why the surge in this condition? Which stats show started around 1989. What happened or changed in 1989? There's nothing unreasonable or fringe or conspiratorial about that question. He also said nobody making a lot of money off all kinds of things like drug sales wants to know. And more importantly, doesn't want us to know. None of this sounds crazy to me.

I think we can all agree that left wing idealogues are trying to indoctrinate children. Emulating Mao's Cultural Revolution tailored to American society. How else to explain how a generation with access to more information than all previous generations is the least informed?

Are you aware the White Helmets are funded by ISIS linked terrorist organizations?

The other thing I've come to understand is what I'll call "Cultural Extremism". Every social issue is defined and viewed as a binary decision. Yes or No. One or Zero. There is no continuum of views that might fall on the point plot at some point between the two extremes. There are no definitions or terms to describe any view in between. If you carefully read many of the conversations here on PPP you can easily pick that up. Posters try to put you into one or the other despite your best efforts to be objective and define your own independent and personal view of issues. There's just no place for that sort of thinking in the social ideologies of today. LGBTQ for example. If you voice agreement with the entirety of the movement then you support LGBTQ. In other words you score 100% in compliance. You score a Yes or a One. But if you disagree with anything, or question anything, you score anywhere between 1 and 99. A 1 to 99 gets you a No or a Zero. You're anti-LGBTQ. If you're like me and have LGBTQ family members, and relationships at work with LGBTQ community persons, or if you have friends and friends of friends that are LGBTQ that you socialize with and can carry on civil conversations and follow customs of good social behavior while treating people with kindness but you disagree with transsexual efforts to groom children they you're anti-LGBTQ. Even if you score a 90 that's still ultimately a zero. Trump is another classic example. If you disagree with everything Trump then you're for Democracy. If you might agree with something like 20% of what Trump represents or question officials seen as representing pro-Democracy then you're un-democratic and a MAGA extremist. As much of an extremist as somebody that agrees with 100% of what Trump says. The 80% you disagree with doesn't matter. Its a binary decision. You're either for us or against us and there ain't no in-between. There's no room for independent thought or views.

That's because Diversity at its core is simply tribalism. Where common culture is replaced by multiple sub-cultures operating with different cultural norms and beliefs. The myth is this will lead to some sort of social Utopia. But in reality, its the driving force in the Balkanization of America.

Don't forget there's a host of others in DOJ and FBI guilty of obstructing inevestigators at IRS, DOJ, and FBI including the AG and FBI Director. I think that's a bigger story than the Biden family payoff and influence racket.. Several IRS whistle blowers attested to that in sworn statements. Which Garland has denied. Somebody's lying. Who do you believe? Working level agents trying to do their job or the AG and other political appointees trying to protect their boss?

This is an example of the ultimate goal of the authoritarians. To condition the population to "self-censor". People are afraid of the blowback and criticism they'll receive from the system of social justice organizations and mouthpieces and the impact it might have on their compensation opportunities and their standing in various social circles. Like Pavlov's dogs. Psychologically conditioning people to avoid consequences.

Whether he's a nutjob or not I think RFK asks questions and reaches conclusions that are a big headache for people running things. The fear is the public listens to his positions, finds them reasoned and logical, gets firsthand exposure to him, assign some credibility to his arguments, and start asking these officials the same questions and more. Questions they don't want to answer. Such as you mention about COVID. And other things of interest. Their strategy to address the problem RFK presents is to pretend he doesn't exist while employing the usual smear and censorship tactics to anyone that defies their control. What the establishment prefers is the public be reliant on an army of credentialed experts they employ for guidance. Saying listen to us and follow our instructions. My problem is I'm a skeptic and I'm always suspicious of authority telling me they've got my interests at heart without being willing to provide some information about their motivations, advice, and directions. I think others that share my skepticism here on the PPP and elsewhere are curious about his ideas while others don't mind being led around by their noses by the official voices. That said, being willing to listen to his ideas doesn't mean I'm throwing my support his way.

The fundamental issue is the non-disclosure and misrepresentation of sources of income. Bribes and payoffs don't generally come with W2 or 1099 forms. So really not so much the avoidance of taxes through improper deductions and credits.

I think the ultimate problem inflicting both parties is the result of money and campaign financing. The national parties hold way too much control and influence over Senators and Representatives. Conformity and obedience is demanded and any attempts to reconcile and compromise with "the enemy" is fraught with negative consequences. Like not getting campaign money or the national party finding a more compliant person to run for your seat in the primary. Maybe getting dropped from committee assignments. All these people campaign at the local or state level on specific issues of interest to the citizens of their district and state then go to Washington and forget about almost all of those issues and pledges. Then just toe the party line at the national level. Anybody that steps out of lines gets roasted or pushed back inside the national party's ideological guardrails I'm not sure what the solution to a lack of independence and conviction to getting things done might be other than prohibiting large donors and more regulation and rules around PACs and other sources of funds.

I think its just because Schiff is a slimy pathological liar. But that's quite a conspiracy theory you've got there. My guess is from the looks of his expanding waistline, the only thing Trump is ordering lately is a couple Big Macs and a large shake.