All_Pro_Bills

Hoax. You care about protecting liberal politicians. None of that, true or false, exonerates the Biden's from any accusations and factual accounts of their contacts and meetings with various Chinese contacts where they traded influence for money.

Yes. What's curious is this indictment is from 2017 while the original post and tweets from various twits makes it seem like it happened yesterday. So suddenly the order is sent down to the mainstream media and social media machine to charge up and communicate a 6 year old story. The timing is rather coincidental to other whistler blowers coming forward. It says the Biden's and their protectors have abandoned the denial strategy and are now forced into fire fighting. A kill the messenger approach perhaps both literally and figuratively for now. What was it on another thread, "the walls are closing"? Start the countdown. You win today's gold star for being first at tagging this to Trump. But that Newsweek story is smoke and mirrors to divert attention from the main theme. Biden's dirty. You better find another candidate for 2024 because he's finished.

I did see this interesting fun fact. The whistleblower reportedly worked with CEFC-USA—the nonprofit arm of the Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China—between 2015 and 2018, the same period CEFC-China began its influence operations with the Biden family. He told the DOJ and the FBI in Brussels that Joe Biden, soon after his vice presidential term ended, had attended a meeting at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, DC, with his son Hunter and officials from CEFC. His account of the former VP’s presence at that meeting was corroborated 21 months later when the FBI interviewed another attendee, Biden family associate Rob Walker, according to recent testimony before Congress. He disclosed during the Brussels interview that CEFC was paying $100,000 a month to Hunter and $65,000 to his uncle Jim Biden, in exchange for their FBI connections and use of the Biden name to promote China’s Belt and Road Initiative around the world — and that the money was being funneled through Walker. The most “alarming” information he shared in Brussels pertained to a mole in the DOJ who shared classified information with Hunter Biden and his Chinese partners. Obviously, all of it should be immediately dismissed.

The lesson here is if you've got the goods on somebody in Washington, the last group of people on Earth you want to trust is the FBI.

Lying is an essential skill for communists. If they told the truth about their desire to brainwash your children I suspect they'd meet a lot more resistance. Instead, they just need to convince all the idiots that anyone opposed to their ideas is ethical and morally compromised. Shout out the same slogans over and over again and avoid any details. Or facts, and God forbid, any objective discussions. Just say it over and over. The big lie, right? Ops, there's one of those references. I think the lesson of history is evil people disguising their agenda use and run the same playbook. And while Hitler was evil, both Mao and Stalin, two infamous communists, killed way more people than Hitler. He's at best #3. The communists killed 40, maybe 50 million. Let's not forget or overlook that fact.

FBI Director Comey publicly boasted of his intent to entrap Flynn. Sure Flynn fell for it. But this admission at a minimum should tell you Comey's intentions were tainted. I might add, he also admitted passing confidential information to his contact at the NY Times leaking news of an ongoing investigation (a real big no-no according to AG Garland) and by way of some slight of hand somehow avoided any charges under the now famous Espionage Act. Yet another pesky exception to that nobody is above the law mantra most curiously when the perpetrator provides an unambiguous public confession. A slamdunk prosecution for any first year law student. But surprise! Off to the talk show circuit instead of jail.

The thing about war crimes is with few exceptions they're generally committed by the losers. After WW2 there were the Nuremberg trials of former Nazi officials and SS officers for assorted atrocities, murder, and crimes against humanity. Completely appropriate. But, for example, no WW2 British or American civilian or military leaders were charged with the firebombing of Dresden, a target with no military value, in February 1945 which targeted a civilian population with casualty estimates as high as 250K deaths. The RAF sent 800 bombers on the night of 2/13/1945 followed up by a US air corps 210 bomber daytime raid on 2/15/1945. History demonstrates you win the war, you write the story, you skate off free and clear.

Its a damn alternative reality freak show! Most amazing is how you can get so many people that know its all horseshit to go along with it. In this case pageant judges. And these chicks cheering it on? Are they nuts too? They're cowards and enablers, afraid to make a stand and tell the truth. That's a dude folks! What is the malfunction going on between their ears that makes them think otherwise? "When you deny what is self-evident, you are at war with reality, and that never ends well. This is the ultimate disposition of our country’s years-long misadventure in maximum dishonesty". from Jim Kunstlers blog today.

That's not what @reddogblitzsaid. The premise was a war of attrition would favor the side with the larger force. That seems logical and mathematically sound. Its a reasonable question to ask under circumstances when somebody pledges unlimited support. So if it comes to the point where they don't have enough soldiers to either win the war or fight to a stalemate what's the action coming out of the administration's "whatever it takes" pledge to fix that problem? Outside of surrender it would be get some troops from someplace else, So where is this someplace else? How is asking that question appeasement? Does "whatever it takes" include US forces in direct combat operations? Yes or no? And if the answer is "no" are you prepared to allow Ukraine to lose?

I say if that's what they want then let the libs abort themselves out of existence over the next 20 to 30 years.

The Bills addressed some personnel problems in the off season, notably the offensive line. The expectation is better protection for Allen and some push in the running game along with adding some physical RB's to the group. The addition of Kincaid should eventually make the offense much more difficult to defend. I'm not so sure the WR group was upgraded much but word is the Bills are still in the running for Hopkins as long as it doesn't break the bank. Floyd and Rapp are good adds on defense and a healthy group of last year's core, minus Edmunds, should do well. What concerns me is that Miami and New York have also addressed some areas and while the Bills look to be better the division rivals have probably closed the gap.

You love yourself some BLM and Antifa riots. How many cops got injured in those? You guys didn't care about them one bit. How many 40 month sentences got handed out for attacking police, firebombing federal facilities? Like none! You cheered when liberal businesses refused to serve law enforcement people. You supported defunding police in crime infested cities. And my oh my, how that worked out so well! Now you're friends of the cops? I call bullsheet on that. Its just a convenient yet contradictory position to take because it suits the situation. Admit it.

This administration should know partisan hackery and obstruction when they see it. Other than playing victim, that's pretty much all they're good at. It's all Democrats did 2017 to 2020. Payback is what?

Funny because your cult hates cops.

Proof is simple observation. With few exceptions thie top jobs in this administration are filled by incompetent and unqualified people. The military is no exception.

Promotions under Biden are diversity driven to ensure the most unqualified commanders are promoted to the highest levels to meet the administration's quota objectives while putting the enlisted military men and women in danger that comes from substandard leadership.

Our friend @sherpa was pretty confident Russia's conventional force capability was inferior and they've performed more or less as expected. I have to believe the military and Russia analysts at the Pentagon, State dept, and Intelligence drew similar conclusions. But as is typical the publicly provided assessment strays from the confidential one.

There is indeed a lot of BS. The fact Russia's frontline force is a mercenary group is telling about the incompetency of their government forces. Another thing I find particularly absurd is that Putin's goal is to re-capture the former Soviet block States. They've demonstrated the ability to re-take nothing. Its pure fantasy. Surely, he must know that along with every military analyst at the Pentagon knows it. Every time I hear somebody articulate that danger I get a good chuckle. It's about as likely as me regaining my youthful energy and "good" looks. Something I've shouted out low and high is we should be.100 times more focused and concerned about China. In a lot of ways the obsession with Russia is a dangerous distraction from the real threat. Like worrying about a Racoon rifling through the trash can outside the cabin in the woods while unnoticed a pack of Wolves lurks just beyond the treeline. Lately. It seems that threat is started to get more attention but more is required. Not only are they building a formidable military they've also infiltrated most American private and public institutions through their program of "elite capture".

I appreciate your insights on these weapons systems and previous experience with Russian tactics and weapons which enables you to understand and "see" the conflict from the perspective of the opponent. A valuable skill in many areas. I do have a few follow up questions if I may? Short of tactical nukes, are there any weapons in the arsenal you would recommend being withheld for proprietary or other reasons like not wanting to risk the enemy capturing and reverse engineering it? Sure we said do whatever it takes but everything has constraints and risks. Do you think the Russians are holding back anything? Advanced weopons or assets like special forces units? What's your best case assessment for Ukraine? My rudimentary assessment is there's no path to victory, if that's defined as expelling Russia from all held territory, without a direct US/NATO combat commitment. That appears off the table, for now

I'm not familiar with the specifics of the rules of engagement but aren't civilian areas generally off limits regardless of the type of weapon?

They can easily drug test every government employee that was on duty that day. Nobody should protest. It's a matter of national security. If they can force you to take a shot it should be okay to provide a urine sample. And I assume all "guests" are required to sign in so it shouldn't be hard to narrow it down to a couple suspects by simple process of elimination. We all know the identity of one likely suspect but like every other suspicious action from this crew they'll bury it and the media will memory hole the story. While claiming Hunter is a victim of all those mean people suggesting a coke addict might be a prime suspect in this case. KJP will answer all questions on the topic by saying she doesn't want to get into hypothetical (I might try this approach when my boss asks me when I'll be finished with client requests. I'll let you know how that goes). When she speaks the no comment answer the WH press corps will bark on queue with approval and that will be the end of it. Just in case the emperors pretorian guard known in Washington as the FBI will be on call to harass anyone that says a discouraging word about the Biden's. Everyone enjoy your weekend.

Maybe you should wake up from your dream and ask why the FBI is running a political protection racket?

What Russia wanted was assurances NATO wouldn't park tactical weapons in Ukraine right across the border and in exchange Russia would reciprocate on their side of the border. This was clearly articulated in discussions which were attended by officials from Washington. Is that point of contention such a show stopper? Deescalate and remove offensive weapons from the border. Is avoiding that deal worth sacrificing 1/2 million lives and blowing $100 billion of borrowed money? Of course the response from the war hawks is we can't trust Putin to keep his word. But it's not his word. It's an easily verifiable and visible arrangement. What many are missing is this conflict is a mere sideshow and a diversion from what most of the rest of the world prefers. Negotiating mutually beneficial arrangements. And outside of the European vassal states the majority are looking to disengage from our 20 ton truck doesn't need road manners foreign policy. The consequences of this are much of the world is in the process of accelerating arrangements with other nations without the US being dealt into the deal. The BRICS alliance, the belt and road iniative, shanghai cooperative organization, energy deals in the Middle East, the Saudi's moving away support of US interests in the region, and most threatening China spreading their influence across the planet with business deals and economic development while we engage in perpetual conflict. The worst part of it is how so many are oblivious to it all.

The Council on Foreign Relations is a "think tank" that has consistently advocated and supported every failed war and intervention hatched in Washington. Among its ranks are lobbyists for weapons suppliers, neocons, and an army of war proponents that shuffle between the Federal bureaucracy and the defense industry and various organizations advocating for war. All that's been accomplished by this is to kill lots of people, line the pockets of Washington and defense industry insiders, and weaken our country from within and in the international community. This Ukraine fiasco will end no differently. Another one in the loss column. The other thing these clucks have accomplished, is what I expect will go down as one of the biggest strategic blunders in history which is to drive China and Russia together out of necessity and a common enemy. How stupid is that? To consciously make a decision to bring the #2 and #3 world powers together against you when it would have been just as easy to pursue a policy of engaging Russia to form a US/Russia/NATO alliance against China. That's my major beef with this entire conflict. Not some inclination to see one side or the other prevail or some flag waving exercise pretending we're supporting some fledgling democracy against evil but rather that it wasn't necessary and several better alternatives were available. But the sociopaths and savages just couldn't resist another opportunity to blow stuff up and watch more people die. So now we'll suffer the consequences of dropping down to #2 in a not so far off time.

Suburban middle/upper class liberal white women are too busy running their kids around town to various activities and Summer camps in their gas guzzling Escalades and Suburbans (with "Demand Climate Change Action Now" bumper stickers in a demonstration of no self-awareness) to have any time to worry about gun control laws as long as urban black young men are the majority of the people getting killed.