Jump to content

Over 29 years of fanhood

Community Member
  • Posts

    26,346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Over 29 years of fanhood

  1. I feel like I have seen that tactic before, act negotiable to eat away the time then put up the wall in the 11th hour. With a complicit media, the political risk isn’t huge. I can hear it now; ‘we’ll stop paying some very visible checks and feed the media the narrative to blame you Mr speaker”
  2. from your own article 😂 Game set and match
  3. you position a self serving insinuation that college educated equals intellectual superiority and to selection of your ideology. I posit that there are numerous educational factors and that income tends to be in capitalist society a better measure of intellect. And when examining that break out it shatters that notion. your party is propped up by deadbeats.
  4. again you see points in isolation and miss the big picture (also I never said physics was the degree, just that my degree required mastery of that subject as well) Re ROI topic, smart people in a capitalist society make money. And here’s how people vote by income. Your majority is comprised of the dregs of our economy
  5. Another non narrative therefore not national story; man kills teenager because he believed he was a Republican https://www.dailywire.com/news/north-dakota-man-pleads-guilty-to-manslaughter-after-hitting-teen-he-feared-was-linked-to-republican-extremist-group
  6. and my entire point i to try and understand why democrats particularly liberal democrats are so obsessed with sexual identity. It’s perverted and disgusting. Why is it central to all topics and why are they (your side) such narcissists. I do apologize that it seems to have invigorated some repressed homophobic anger. as for the other assertions let’s see: 1) my assertion of electoral tendencies was upheld by a study. You cited a different survey with a different sample and conclusion. The studies conflicted eachother. But the smug analogy that smart people are democrats is a lie. 2) earths contour- I have a much stronger background in physics than a chem major that can draw some pretty diagrams of aromatic rings and pvc. I also directly benefit from the attributes of geosynchronous orbit. 3) while yes you are older, and clearly angrier you’d never goad me into physical violence. You are not worth the consequences, irrational religious belief in politicians is incurable and I’m not some kind of neanderthal that thinks that solves a thing. 4) and this is the one you really need to absorb, society is meant to be organized with people who have differences of opinion that co exist. I have never met a MAGA, that I know of, but know plenty of moderate Republicans, moderate democrats and independents and some extreme liberals and some extreme conservatives. All of them have a right to an opinion with out being castigated as evil treasonous traders. And just because someone disagrees with you or you opinion it doesn’t mean they worship Donald trump 5) trusting the media or the government or any political party is insane. 6) people who want to keep fear mongering about fascism would be best served to do some historical research and realize every highway in history that led to fascism got there through a socialist government or the guise of one. And elements of this democratic regime, the heavy hands on the levers of power and the complicit media look more like authoritarian fascism than at any time in recent history.
  7. As bad a trump was it was In fathomable it could be worse…. Biden was gladly worse with a pleasant smile 😀
  8. Finally a conspiracy theory that makes sense
  9. frankly it’s because political alliance is religious and personal let’s not pretend there is a norm of productive debate here. no one ever wants to solve problems, explore differences and reach common ground. its 100% “your opinion is evil and idiotic and mine is flawless.” Left right liberal conservative… no body wants to use debate to develop intellect or learn. at the same time it’s an outlet if you just feel like arguing… easy to find hostility I don’t even think half these people believe anything they write
  10. Au contraire - red hawk just took his first step toward joining the insurrectionists If he can swing extremes that fast … compromise may be achieved
  11. you hope I’m dumb so you can engage me in discussion about sexual fetishes? 😳
  12. since your ilk believes what they do, pretty sure you can still say you are Heterosexual even if your wife has a penis, so not ever sure I know how to speak your language on these topics. also can’t understand why polymorphic sexual activities are institutionally critical for second graders either. You folks are so ***** weird. since you don’t care I’ll leave my other half out.
  13. why is sexuality so important to you lefty’s All the time? do you feel you need to work how you stimulate your urges into mortgage negotiations and interactions with the neighbors?
  14. still good guys vs bad guys huh? not just different opinions trying to strike a balance… that’s not democracy you believe in, that’s monocracy you subscribe to
  15. “American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook” and Navy lawyer Maybe Ron will be Joe’s bizzaro world republican version of his guy BO? It sure would be good to get balance of power again
  16. I was trying to figure out how 5 dudes were going to ride one bicycle
  17. I saw the commentary on what the guy who isn’t ceo for Twitter said Twitter should do. I don’t have a strong opinion because I recognize Musk has been an overarching force for good in the world(I say that as I compete directly against him in a space he’s made a lot harder to compete in) but you think the best decision was be blocked completely as opposed to comply in interim and challenge in court? The right choice and why isn’t obvious to me
  18. pretty sure he was talking about Dobbs, which was was resurfaced abortion in the Supreme Court. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization i thought it was a good point. The irony a Dem pac pushed the case to the Supreme Court which led to the reversal. but I’m sure you knew all that right?
  19. Pac isn’t a personal life topic it’s political action committee Was that the confusing part?
  20. Picking a side? The article you cited said turkey’s government said ‘these tweet are illegal, take them down or we take the whole site down.’ He said alright for now but I’ll see you in court. would should he have done?
  21. Loves Putin so much he donated all those starlink terminals to Ukraine and then had his engineers alter the carriers to evade Russian jamming??? yeah Putin love
  22. Don’t feel hurt. PAC is political action committee… does that help?
×
×
  • Create New...