Over 29 years of fanhood

Guessing when this happens immediately after the trade deadline it’s because of what wasn’t bought or sold?

throwing into that mass of humanity is the definition of arm arrogance. For any other QB that’s a pick 6.

And won so good

- it generates a ton of waste, the candy, one time costumes all crap - the candy is not green food or healthy - all the door opening must contribute to global warming Why don’t they target this holiday as a patriarchal oppressive norm ???

Right! let’s just agree RPO inside the 5 is a no go. Let’s do conventional there

I reduced it to just the ones on your list with better winning percentages

Saying anything during that era work ‘well’ is extremely generous

Won a ring with Philly had 9 picks in last 2.5 seasons … ok ok

100%- I remember the renegade thing at a Steelers game

I think it just means they did find anyone to dance with for those spots. Damn I wish Kirksey worked

I’m starting to this this defense is going to evolve to rotation of 4 down lineman supported by 7 safety sized dudes of varying athleticism.

man’s he would’ve gotten away with it if the invisibility cloak didn’t wear off That narrows it down to 60 people

maybe that is the josh Norman job description

Wtf?

when cap constrained it’s important to be reluctant in parting with early picks that are supposed to produce cheap starters for 4 years. at the same time they were pretty good at dealing players for picks that weren’t their guys, when they first came to town. Darby, Sammy, Tyrod I think?

See Diggs trade

his absence vs the Patriots was notable as well.

A lot less mileage too. Some 700 or 800 less Carries

maybe RPO needs to drop from the playbook on the goal line.

Oh good … the safety sized guy who was benched or the one named after a ghost, because of what happens on game day? Is that the complication of big moves to address the situation ?? Bernard gets dinged like he was all preseason and the offense will need to put up 50 ppg

be glad all you want. Several things can be true. 1) despite Edmunds lack of instincts, his size and athleticism made him an effective starter in the middle of an excellent defensive year after year 2) he wasn’t worth the deal he got from Chicago based on his shortcomings and he rarely created turnovers or factored into the pass rush 3) most people who zeroed in on blaming him for long running plays have no clue how a gap defense works 4) he still put enough good work on film to get paid a lot of money and multiple pro bowl nods. 5) his availability has been very high 6) the organization did little to backfill a pretty critical area of the defense and one injury to milano (3rd season ending injury) later the defense is hosed 7) he never really lived up to his draft pick 8- several good players considered him a good player.

Of course it’s fair. The team lost a player to free agency, elevated a back up on the roster to start and didn’t address lack of depth. It’s a major problem. Those two linebacker spots are pretty important in the scheme. Bernard is a ball hawk, but he’s been attacked a little more the past couple weeks and that seam has been attacked a bunch more too, exposing Taron a bit too.

Who said that anywhere?

we know he wasn’t a ball hawk. … the patriots game was the first time in a long time I’ve seen an offense repeatedly attack the middle of this defensive scheme with success. I think there is a real big problem in the middle of the defense.

He wasn’t worth what the bears paid, but anyone thinks the current linebacker situation is an upgrade is sorely mistaken. especially with Milano entirely predictably having his third season significantly effected by injury. With Milano out, Edmunds and Bernard would be a whole lot better than Bernard and Williams/Dodson/Poyer…