So you admit he was found to have perjured himself. Now we're getting somewhere. Glad we can agree on something. Now, should he face consequences for his perjury?
He lied under oath 4 times. This was proven by the FBI's own investigative team. You ask why people have little confidence in the FBI well this is a pretty large reason. Put aside your Trump hate for a minute and ask yourself if you want the absolute upmost professionalism from the FBI and if they should see consequences for illegal actions? Anything other than a yes means you are being intentionally ignorant.
I would expect the director of the FBI to not lie under oath and if they did so would be fired. Pretty important job. Again, it comes back to why don't they just do their job better? If I lied under oath I'd probably be charged. Not him though. Good ol democrat
Yes he got his back pay and pension back. That doesn't mean he didn't lie under oath, leak info to the media among other things. You realize this right? Please tell me you understand this.
Well if she gets sued I'd think she would be disbarred for ethical reasons as that would be public info right? She could still volunteer and advise though.
No it was due to the warrant issue and plenty of other things like leaking to the media and I lying under oath. It was a myth created that it was a loyalty issue. Try again. Again, why don't they just do their job better?
Wouldn't telling them to do their job better come to mean that they will be keeping their jobs? BTW they also lied to get warrants against Trump pre election. This lead to Strzok, Mccabe being fired. BTW how about the Whitmer kidnapping plot that it would seem they concocted. Plotting to kidnap a sitting governor is pretty serious. So again, why don't they do better at their jobs?
Waco, Ruby Ridge, 125 mil settlement cause they let the parkland kids get shot, future settlement for letting mich st rapist doc rape hundreds of girls and on and on. How about they do their job better?
I had an ex in the IRS and she went specifically after drug dealers. She had to be at stakeouts and the raids and she eventually went into personal protection for the head of the IRS and was the first female on that detail. She always carried and all her fellows agents did as well on those types of units. So the armed ones would generally be going to the drug raids and other raids they think their could be weapons.
He can manage a game pretty well and that's useful if you have a team like San Fran where you have a great defense, weapons at wr and rb. Like if we had him on the Tyrod teams we'd be in the playoffs and win a game or two but never quite the big one. His main issue is availability. He plays like every other year.
it’s the court of public opinion. The appearance of a double standard. All these investigations that seem to go towards one party while the other gets off. It undermines the confidence in the system.
the mental gymnastics of not charging someone who had more than 200 times more illegal info is very funny to me. Not to mention the fact that as a president he could have de classified these documents which Hillary couldn’t.
feds knew they had nothing so they leak they were looking for nuclear secrets to make him look guilty and justify their search to the general public and rubes like you. It’s wild to see
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy
read that and see who had more classified info than her. Shouldn’t we give trump the intent defense as well?